1 / 15

Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity

Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity. Longevity & Fertility Investigation. 1,062,791 c ows born 1992-1994 Daughters of 3080 Holstein sires Progeny tested bulls with > 60 daughters Older bulls to provide ties and relationships Compare two measures of longevity

leroy-kane
Télécharger la présentation

Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity

  2. Longevity & Fertility Investigation • 1,062,791 cows born 1992-1994 • Daughters of 3080 Holstein sires • Progeny tested bulls with > 60 daughters • Older bulls to provide ties and relationships • Compare two measures of longevity • Productive Life (max 10 mo / lactation) • Lifespan (first calving until death) • Develop new fertility evaluation

  3. Longevity Parameter EstimatesMulti-trait REML Analysis

  4. Cow Fertility DataMulti-trait REML Analysis • First lactation records • Days Open (DO) = Calving interval – 280d • Limits on DO • Lower limit of 50d • Upper limit of 250d • ‘Sold for reproductive problems’ DO = 250d • ‘Sold for other reasons’ DO = 150d (mean) • Cows sold for dairy not included

  5. Fertility Parameter EstimatesMulti-trait REML Analysis

  6. Proposed USDA Fertility Evaluation • Lactations 1-5 beginning with 1960 • Days Open data • Reported DO confirmed with next calving • Exclude most recent 9 months • Reported DO if no next calving • Exclude most recent 9 months • Calving interval – 280 days if no reported DO • Exclude most recent 18 months • Assigned DO = 250 if sold for infertility

  7. Distribution of Days OpenHolstein Calvings 1990 - 2001 Cows culled for reproductive reasons ≤ 50 ≥ 250

  8. Holstein Phenotypic Trend Lactation 5th 4th 3rd 2nd 1st

  9. Proposed Evaluation Methods • BLUP Animal Model • Same programs used for yield, PL, SCS • Adjust for heterogeneous variance • Parameter estimates used: • Heritability = 4% • Repeatability = 11% • Sire-by-herd interaction = 1%

  10. Evaluation Test Run • Holstein data from May 2002 evaluation • 36 million lactations • 14 million cows • Statistics for recent, well-sampled bulls • Born 1994 - 1997 • Milk REL > 80% (mean = 87%) • 4215 Holstein bulls • 314 Jersey bulls

  11. Bull Evaluations

  12. Days Open Trends • Phenotypic trend 1960 - 1998 Holstein: +37 days Jersey: +20 days • Genetic trend 1960 - 1998 Holstein: +17 days Jersey: +9 days • Expected correlated response Milk trend x.38 correlation = +17 days

  13. Reporting of Cow Fertility • Add mean (such as SCS, calving difficulty)? • Reverse scale so positive is desirable? • Possible names and abbreviations • PTA DO Days Open • PTA DPDate Pregnant or Daughter Pregnancy • PTA CFCow Fertility • Report preliminary August 2002 rankings?

  14. Conclusions • Date pregnant has low heritability (~4%) but high genetic correlation with Productive Life (>.5) • May 2002 test successful, November 2002 official evaluations possible • Indirect selection on PL has reduced decline in fertility, but direct selection could increase lifetime profit. • Productive Life preferred over Lifespan

  15. Acknowledgments • Fertility data for the proposed USDA evaluation were prepared by Ashley Sanders • Statistical and graphical analysis of results were provided by Mel Tooker

More Related