1 / 14

Is the ejection of the corona a general phenomenon in microquasars?

Is the ejection of the corona a general phenomenon in microquasars?. J. Rodriguez & L. Prat (CEA Saclay, France) with special thanks to M. Coriat and S. Corbel. Summary. Microquasars : Definition (some) Light curves Model independent view: the Q-shape Accretion-ejection connections:

lesley-matthews
Télécharger la présentation

Is the ejection of the corona a general phenomenon in microquasars?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Is the ejection of the corona a general phenomenon in microquasars? J. Rodriguez & L. Prat (CEA Saclay, France) with special thanks to M. Coriat and S. Corbel

  2. Summary • Microquasars : • Definition • (some) Light curves • Model independent view: the Q-shape • Accretion-ejection connections: • Historically: GRS 1915+105 • Some more examples: XTE J1748-288, XTE J1856+229, Cyg X-1 • Beyond the phenomenology: physics of outbursts • First steps with XTE J1550-564 and GRS 1915+105: ejection of the corona • What about other sources: the cases of XTE J1748-288, XTE J1856+229, GX 339-4 • Conclusions

  3. Microquasars and diagnostics } Self-absorbed or not Synchrotron: large  -> IR/Visible Thermal emission: BB ~1 keV } Timing “Noise”, LF & HF QPO: global movement of disc? Of corona? Other mechanism(s)? Non-thermal emission: inverse Compton or Synchrotron: 10 keV-1 MeV

  4. Microquasars in outburst XTE J1859+226 GBI RXTE/ASM RXTE/ASM GRS 1915+105 RXTE/ASM XTE J1748-288 GBI Ryle RXTE/ASM

  5. A model-independent view Fender et al. ‘05; Homan & Belloni ‘05; Remillard & Mc Clintock ‘06

  6. Accretion-ejection connections Mirabel et al. ‘98 Rodriguez et al. ‘08 • RXTE+IR+Radio => 1st direct link between accretion and ejection (Mirabel et al. ‘98) • INTEGRAL+Ryle => generalisation of this phenomenon: Ejection always follows sequence of spectrally hard dip ended by sudden spike (R. et al. ‘08)

  7. Towards a general picture? GX 339-2 Cyg X-1 XTE J1859+226 XTE J1748-288 Wilms et al. ‘07 Courtesy M. Coriat

  8. Beyond the phenomenology: ejection of coronal material? XTE J1550-564 Rodriguez et al. ‘03 Fits to X-ray data: • Behaviour and flux of various spectral components during outbursts Radio detection with ATCA (Corbel et al. ‘01)

  9. GRS 1915+105 I II III IV Approach of disc + Compton component shrinks between II and III (R. et al. ‘08)

  10. XTE J1748-288 disc flux coronal flux More complex morphology of radio outburst: multiple flares

  11. XTE J1859+226 Evolution of fluxes not conclusive However: ykTe max(, 2) With max(, 2)R, mean number of scattering  factor 10

  12. GX 339-4 Radio Flare Hard State • Compton flux  before radio flare • Y shrinks before radio flare => decrease of coronal density • Disc remains ~stable Soft State Compton flux y

  13. Conclusions • Evolution of fluxes: Ejection of the corona pretty clear in 3 sources (1550-564, 1915+105, GX339-4): coronal flux shrinks before the ejection • Fluxes not conclusive in 1748-288 and 1859+226 • Physical properties of corona: in 1915+105, 1748-288, 1859+226, and GX 339-4: Comptonisation still in action after ejection, but physical properties of the corona drastically change: xR shrinks <=>(partial) ejection of coronal material

  14. The future 4U 1543-47 XTE J1908+094 Several other candidates: • H1743-322/IGR J17464-3213 • 4U 1543-47 • XTE J1908+094 • GRO J1655-40 • Cyg X-1 ? • Cyg X-3 ? • Aql X-1 ? H1743-322

More Related