1 / 12

Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientio

This study explores the connection between O*NET skill and ability ratings and job analyst cognitive ability and conscientiousness. It examines potential inaccuracies in the O*NET system and identifies strategies to reduce these relationships. The study involved 322 undergraduate business students who made ratings of a fictional job. Results show that ability ratings are more influenced by individual differences, but giving detailed task information can help mitigate this impact.

lhammack
Télécharger la présentation

Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientio

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Investigating the Relationship Between O*NET Skill and Ability Ratings and Job Analyst Cognitive Ability and Conscientiousness Frederick P. Morgeson & Kelly Delaney-Klinger Michigan State University Donald Truxillo Portland State University Download the slides at: http://www.msu.edu/~morgeson/

  2. Potential Inaccuracy in O*NET • Ability-based system vs. Task-based system in DOT • Ability judgments require greater abstract reasoning Harvey (1991); Morgeson & Campion (2000) Morgeson, Delaney-Klinger, Mayfield, Ferrara, & Campion (In press)

  3. Impact of Individual Differences • What’s Been Studied • Age, sex, race • Experience level, education level • What’s Been Ignored • General Cognitive Ability • Conscientiousness

  4. Our Contributions • Examine link between job analyst cognitive ability and conscientiousness and O*NET skill and ability ratings • If there is a problem…what could we do? • Identify potential strategy for reducing relationships

  5. Method • Participants • 322 undergraduate business students • Job analysis training • Experience with job (M = 10 prior business classes) • Overall Activity • Made ratings of the job of “a teacher in the business school”

  6. Method, cont. • Experimental Design Condition 1 O*NET: Skills & Abilities Wonderlic NEO - C Condition 2 Task Ratings O*NET: Skills Wonderlic NEO - C Condition 3 Task Ratings O*NET: Abilities Wonderlic NEO-C

  7. Item Example-Skill Reading Comprehension: Understanding written sentences and paragraphs in work related documents. How important is READING COMPREHENSION to the performance of the job of a teacher in the business school? (1-5: Not important to Extremely Important) What level of READING COMPREHENSION is needed to perform the job of a teacher in the business school? (1-7) Anchors: 2 Read step-by-step instructions for completing a form 4 Read a memo from management describing new personnel policies 6 Read a scientific journal article describing surgical procedures

  8. Item Example - Ability Oral Expression: The ability to communicate information and ideas in speaking so others will understand. How important is ORAL EXPRESSION to the performance of the job of a teacher in the business school? (1-5: Not important to Extremely Important) What level of ORAL EXPRESSION is needed to perform the job of a teacher in the business school? (1-7) Anchors: 2 Cancel newspaper delivery by phone 4 Give instructions to a lost motorist 6 Explain advanced principles of genetics to college freshmen

  9. Item Example-Task Categories

  10. Results-Skills • 19 of 140 correlations significant (13.57%) • Exposure to tasks before skill ratings decreased relationships (14 of 19 were reduced) Samples:

  11. Results-Abilities • 58 of 208 correlations significant (27.88%) • Exposure to tasks before skill ratings decreased relationships (48 of 58 were lower) Samples:

  12. Conclusions • Ability ratings are more susceptible to influence of individual differences • Giving detailed task information helped reduce impact of individual differences on ratings

More Related