1 / 25

Outline

Outline. V.Kostioukhine, P.Nevski. A.Rozanov Motivations for improvements in b-layer Test layout for MC studies Additional b-layer at R=3.7 cm Material budgets Pixel Occupancy. 5 s. M H (GeV). b-tagging for SM Higgs. b-tagging role in: Discovery channel ttH with H-> bb

liam
Télécharger la présentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outline • V.Kostioukhine, P.Nevski. A.Rozanov • Motivations for improvements in b-layer • Test layout for MC studies • Additional b-layer at R=3.7 cm • Material budgets • Pixel Occupancy A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  2. 5s MH(GeV) b-tagging for SM Higgs b-tagging role in: • Discovery channel • ttH with H-> bb • Supplementary channels • WH with H-> bb • ttH with H-> WW* • Background channels • ttjj • ttbb A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  3. Performance contributions • Resolutions Rphi, Z • Pitch, cluster size, charge sharing (tilt,Lorenz),analog vs digital readout • Pattern recognition: efficiency, fakes, ambiguous hits, shared hits • Material: multiple scattering, secondary, conversions, b-layer radius A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  4. Pileup • Pileup influence on b-tagging: • Wrong selection of primary vertex (dominant, but manageable in analysis…) • Tracks from pileup vertices in jets (with big Z impact parameters of course) Zvertex resolution for current ID is 50m <Nvrt> - mean number of pileup vertices in ±150m from primary vertex A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  5. Pileup Minimal distance between primary and pileup vertices at Z=0 IR = 5.6cmNint = 23 IR = 2.1cmNint = 88 mm mm Better Z track and primary vertex resolution is needed to improve primary vertex reconstruction and rejection of pileup tracks (track - vertex association) A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  6. Performances versus jet pT, η • Non-uniform performances: • even if very good at ||=0 and 50<P<150 GeV, still not satisfactory at ||~2 and P>250GeV • tagging b-jets can bias kinematics IP2D IP3D+SV1 εb= 60% IP2D IP3D+SV1 εb= 60% Worsening of b-tagging performance at ||>1 is due to material. Any way to improve? A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  7. Pixel layout ||=2.0 112mm ||=2.5 A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  8. Setup + software ATLSIM (Geant3 simulation) rel.10.0.6.DC1 model of ID (pixel).xKalmanOO from HEAD.Private version of b-tagging software. One pixel layer is added (Norbert’s proposal parameters):R=37mm16 staves (old DC1 design)Zpitch=250µm (no long pixels and gap between chips)Tilt=100Sensor thickness=250µmSensor and geometry are old  overlaps are not well defined (will be corrected soon) A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  9. Layout Rb1= 37.0mmRb2= 50.5mm R1 = 88.5mmR2 = 122.5mm • To reduce thickness of new layer: • Support shell is absent • Thickness of stave (nonsensitive) is decreased A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  10. Layout Material budget • To reduce thickness of new layer: • Old b-layer R=5.05 cm 2.2 % X0 • New b-layer R=3.7 cm 1.2 % X0 A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  11. Layout Geant3 simulation of 3GeV pionin new pixel layout 4 hits in pixel det. A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  12. Pixel occupancy at ||=0 Geant3 simulation of new pixel layout. 24 ev pileup (1034),IR=5.6cm, WH(120)µuu events. 16.4x60.0 mm2 sensor with 250µm Z pitch. Number of hits in module at ||=0 New layer R=37mm Existing layer R=50.5mm A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  13. Pixel occupancy at ||=2.5 Geant3 simulation of new pixel layout. 24 ev pileup (1034),IR=5.6cm, WH(120)µuu events. 16.4x60.0 mm2 sensor with 250µm Z pitch. Number of hits in module at ||=2.5 New layer R=37mm Existing layer R=50.5mm A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  14. Reconstruction ATRECON clusterisation and xKalmanOO from CVS HEAD.No special tuning for 4layer pixel.As reference a 3layer pixel (new b-layer removed) is used. Amount of silicon hits (Pixel+SCT) for “good” tracks3L 4L Additional hit is clearly visible  reconstruction sees additional layer A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  15. Primary vertex (H(120)->uu events) XY(x100) resolution 3L 4L ~10% in XY ~30% in Z improvement in resolution due to 4th layer with 250µm pitch Z resolution 3L 4L A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  16. Modified layout with single b-layer Rb1= 37.0mmRb2= absentR1 = 88.5mmR2 = 122.5mm A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  17. Performance equivalences in old studies • Decrease of the b-layer radius from 5 cm to 4 cm (20% effect) • Decrease of the z-pitch in b-layer from 400 um to 200 um • Decrease of the material in b-layer by 0.6% • Loss of 1% / 2% pixel module/chip inefficiency in b-layer • Partial (2/3) missing the intermediate pixel layer (R=9cm) • Pile-up of 1034 cm2s-1 without muon pointing to primary vertex. A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  18. Secondary vertices 2 mass for WH(120)->uu events3L 4L K0 peek is the same for both layouts  no big problems in pattern recognition R of interaction vertices (material) for WH(120)->uu events after conversion removal3L 4L Additional peek due to new layer is clear good ! Reconstructed number of interactions on beam pipe is smaller  problem ??? A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  19. b-tagging: results Preliminary!!! WH(120)->uu(bb), no pileup, ATLFAST jets, reconstructed primary vertex.“Shared” pixel treatment switched off. Tracking performance seems ok for 4 layers case but b-tagging is worse comparing with current design. Track part of b-tagging is mainly responsible for worsening. Reconstruction tuning gives some improvement in b-tagging for 4L case. Not clear if it allows finally to overcome initial performance. A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  20. b-tagging: illustration Track 2D impact significance with respect to primary vertex u-jets3L 4L Distributions are obtained AFTER conversions, K0/s and material interactions removal (although removal is based on reconstruction so not ideal…) A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  21. b-tag:result for single b-layer(37mm) Preliminary!!! WH(120)->uu(bb), no pileup, ATLFAST jets,reconstructed primary vertex.“Shared” pixel treatment switched off. Track reconstruction program is the same in both cases A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  22. ||>1 with single b-layer(37mm) WH(120)->uu(bb), no pileup, ATLFAST jets,reconstructed primary vertex. High ||>1 region.“Shared” pixel treatment switched off. Preliminary!!! • With upgraded 3L pixel: • Rejection in high || region is bigger • Drop of efficiency at high || is smaller Way to improve physics potential of pixel detector at high || ? (see previous talk) Less material in new layer (???). T0 cables are still in place. A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop

  23. Limited access scenario D. Giugni BL Replacement Workshop - Sept 2007- 23 A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop B-layer is replaced without removing all the SQPs and Disk. • This implies to remove one SQP per side, the beam pipe and the existing BL. The B-layer services are trapped in the gap between the barrel and the disk section and they have to be cut to extract the B-Layer. I have asked to evaluate what this means in term of contamination providing the quantity of activated material that is allowed to be dispersed in the air and on the surfaces. • What can be repaired is limited. • PP0 is accessible. Both leaks in the fitting and connector de-mate can be fixed. • Type0 cables are accessible and they can be repaired if the failure is outside the frame. • Optoboards located on the external OSP can be changed as well as the optoheaters • Disk capillaries can be changed if clough. Not the ones of the barrel • Most of the connectivity failures along the SQPs up to PP1 • What cannot be repaired are leaks inside the Disk or in the barrel bi-staves; substitute sector or bi-staves; fix connectivity failure inside frame volume; change most of the optoboard .

  24. Barrel access D. Giugni BL Replacement Workshop - Sept 2007- 24 A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop B-layer is replaced disassembling all the SQP’s, the BPSS and the disk • What can be repaired is a lot. • All the SQPs can be refurbished. Accessing the OptoBoard and Optoheaters. • L1 and L2 Type0 cables are accessible up to the ends of the staves. • All the barrel fittings and many of the disk ones. • All the capillaries can be changed if clough. • What cannot be changed are bi-staves in L2 and L1 that would require a further disassembling

  25. Summary D. Giugni BL Replacement Workshop - Sept 2007- 25 A.Rozanov CPPM 8.10.07 Highlights of b-layer upgrade workshop • Limited access 5.5 months • Barrel access 9.5 months • Local Support access 18.5 months

More Related