1 / 54

Development of Cognitive and Neural Processes Underlying Conflict Resolution

Development of Cognitive and Neural Processes Underlying Conflict Resolution. B.J. Casey, PhD Sackler Professor and Director Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Conflict Resolution.

libby-moreno
Télécharger la présentation

Development of Cognitive and Neural Processes Underlying Conflict Resolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of Cognitive and Neural Processes Underlying Conflict Resolution B.J. Casey, PhD Sackler Professor and Director Sackler Institute for Developmental Psychobiology Weill Medical College of Cornell University

  2. Conflict Resolution Ability to suppress inappropriate thoughts and actions in favor of appropriate ones (cognitive control). - adjust/alter thoughts and actions (when predictions about what and when things should happen are violated) - self-imposing limitations or adjusting behavior when limitations are set externally

  3. Development of Cognitive Control Accuracy Reaction Time Behavioral Performance 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Age Figure 2

  4. Behavioral Paradigms Stimulus Selection Task suppress attention to salient, irrelevant stimulus set Response Selection Task suppress a competing behavioral set in favor of alternative set Response Execution Task suppress a compelling response altogether (avoid)

  5. Stimulus Selection Task Which object is different?

  6. Stimulus Selection Task Which object is different?

  7. Response Selection Task Press 1st button if you see a “1”, second if you see a “2”... 1 Display Response Box

  8. Response Selection Task Press 1st button if you see a “1”, second if you see a “2”... 2 Display Response Box

  9. Response Selection Task Now reverse it so if you see a “1” press the 4th button, if a 2 press 3rd button and so on. 1 Display Response Box

  10. Response Selection Task Now reverse it so if you see a “1” press the 4th button, if a 2 press 3rd button and so on. 2 Display Response Box

  11. Spiderman NoGo Task “Try to catch Spiderman, but no, no, never catch the Green Goblin or you’ll be sorry!”

  12. 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Normative Development - Response Latency Stimulus Selection Response Selection Response Execution* 1600 r = -.70 r = -.66 r = -.56 1400 1200 RT in msec 1000 800 600 400 200 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Age in Years Age in Years Age in Years * The response execution task is plotted on a different scale. Casey et al. 2002 Dev Psychobiology

  13. Normative Development - Accuracy Stimulus Selection Response Selection Response Execution 100 95 90 85 80 Accuracy 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-14 >15 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-14 >15 5-6 7-8 9-10 11-12 13-14 >15 Age in Years Age in Years Age in Years Casey et al. 2002 Dev Psychobiology

  14. Behavioral Results from Clinical Samples 75 50 25 0 90 60 30 0 * Difference from Matched Controls (%) Reaction Time * * * * Errors Schizophrenia OCD** Tourettes ADHD Stimulus Selection Response Selection Response Execution (DLPFC Circuit) (VLFC Circuit) (MOF/AC Circuit) Casey et al. 2001, 2002, in press ** Sydenham’s chorea patients with OCD Dx

  15. Cognitive Control: Neural Circuitry DLPFC (Stimulus Selection) VLPFC (Response Selection) OFC, ACC (Response Execution) PREFRONTAL CORTEX THALAMUS BASAL GANGLIA

  16. Dorsolateral PFC .50 .25 .00 -.25 -.50 Casey et al 2004 Dev Sci Casey et al 2002 J Neurosci Casey et al 1997 JCog Neuro % MR Signal Change 550 400 450 500 Mean Reaction Time (msec) .50 .25 .00 -.25 -.50 Ventrolateral PFC % MR Signal Change 0 10 20 30 40 50 Percent Difference in Accuracy 30 20 10 0 Orbitofrontal Cortex Number of False Alarms 2250 0 750 1500 Volume of Activation

  17. Dorsolateral PFC Activity 1800 1500 1200 900 600 300 0 * Volume of Activity Children Adults Casey et al. 1997 JoCN * p < .05

  18. Parametric Manipulation of Interference- vary # of preceding Gos before a NoGo Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Time Ventral Prefrontal Activity during Go/Nogo Task Behavioral Performance during Go/Nogo Task Adults Children Adults Children % MR Signal Change Number of False Alarms 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 5 number of go trials preceding a nogo trial number of go trials preceding a nogo trial

  19. Use fMRI maps to examine connectivity Durston et al 2002 Neuroimage

  20. Use fMRI maps to examine connectivity Liston et al submitted

  21. Using nonhuman primate studies of dopamine function to drive behavioral assays in imaging studies

  22. Role of Dopamine in Prediction and Reward unexpected event=INCREASE lack of expected event=DECREASE Shultz, Dayan & Montague, 1997 Science

  23. ADULT IMAGING RESULTS (n=12) Unexpected Event Expected Event (Rare Nontarget) (Frequent Target) = Violation of Expectation or Prediction of Event Type VS = vs Striatum Davidson et al 2003 JCN

  24. IMAGING RESULTS (n=12) Unexpected Event Expected Event (Rare Nontarget) (Frequent Target) = Unexpected Stimulus at Expected Time VS = vs Striatum Davidson et al. submitted

  25. adolescents adults 0.2 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 Striatum * % Change in MR Signal Omission of Stimulus at Expected Time Unexpected Stimulus at Expected Time

  26. IMAGING RESULTS Expected Stimulus at Unexpected Time Unexpected Timing Expected Timing of Event of Event VS = Cerebellum

  27. 0.2 adolescents adults % Change in MR Signal 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 Cerebellum * Omission of Stimulus at Expected Time Unexpected Stimulus at Expected Time

More Related