1 / 17

The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals in the Bay of Fundy

The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals in the Bay of Fundy. Francine Desharnais 1 , Marjo H. Laurinolli 2 , Alex E. Hay 3 , and Douglas J. Schillinger 3 1 DRDC Atlantic 2 JASCO Research Ltd 3 Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University. Outline.

liko
Télécharger la présentation

The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals in the Bay of Fundy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The impact of noise on passive monitoring of marine mammals in the Bay of Fundy Francine Desharnais1, Marjo H. Laurinolli2, Alex E. Hay3, and Douglas J. Schillinger3 1DRDC Atlantic 2JASCO Research Ltd 3Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University

  2. Outline • Designing a system for the Bay of Fundy • Feasibility study for passive detection • SE = SL - (TL + AN) • Transmission loss, source level • Ambient noise on the Scotian Shelf and the Bay of Fundy • Signal excess (some examples) • Conclusions

  3. The problem • North Atlantic right whales • Bay of Fundy • Deeper area of Bay • Clay on top drift • Summer/Fall • Feasibility study with omnidirectional sensors (sonobuoys)

  4. Sample Sounds - Eubalaena Glacialis dB dB low upsweep moan trumpet down cry down cry + harmonics gunshot

  5. Localization methodology [Laurinolli, 2002] • Aural detection • Time delay estimates through spectrogram cross-correlation technique • Localization with crossing of hyperbolae of equal time difference

  6. Transmission loss • Scotian Shelf drift over sandstone • Layer of LaHave clay in deeper basin • Source depth 3 m • Receiver depth 30 m • 180 m water depth • 150 & 500 Hz

  7. Source Level Determination • Lower bound: • 10-200 Hz: 175 dB re 1 Pa @ 1m • 200-800 Hz: 160 dB re 1 Pa @ 1m A.E. Hay, M.H. Laurinolli, F. Desharnais, D.J. Schillinger, Source levels of North Atlantic right whale sounds in the Bay of Fundy (unpublished)

  8. Ambient noise - Key references for Scotian Shelf • Piggott • C.L. Piggott, “Ambient sea noise at low frequencies in shallow water of the Scotian Shelf,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 2152-2163, 1964. • 8.4 - 3100 Hz, 20 and 28 fathoms depths • Ship noise edited out • Main reference for Scotian Shelf

  9. Key references - cont’d • Wenz • G.M. Wenz, “Acoustic ambient noise in the ocean: spectra and sources,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1936-1956, 1962. • Increase by 2.5 dB for shallow water • 2-7 dB lower than Piggott • Knudsen et al. • Knudsen, V. O., Alford, R. S., and Emling, J. W., “Underwater ambient noise,” J. Mar. Res. 3, 410-429, 1948. • Agrees closely with Wenz >500 Hz • <500 Hz Wenz is closer to Piggott

  10. Key references - cont’d • Zakarauskas et al. • P. Zakarauskas, “Ambient noise in shallow water: a survey of the unclassified literature,” Defence Research Establishment Atlantic Technical Memorandum 86/207, 1986. • P. Zakarauskas, D.M.F. Chapman and P.R. Staal, “Underwater acoustic ambient noise levels on the Eastern Canada continental shelf,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 87, 2064-2071, 1990. • <1 kHz • Grand Banks, Scotian Shelf, Flemish Cap, Laurentian Channel • Winter and summer

  11. More references • EC-SWAN (temporal and spatial fluctuations) • Gully and Sable Bank • Western Bank • Bay of Fundy • Classified literature

  12. Scotian Shelf Rules of Thumb • 20 Hz • Seasonal finback cycle (in excess of 25 dB in winter) • Shipping band (10-200 Hz) • Moderate to high shipping on Wenz’ curves for shallow water • EC-SWAN dataset for specific areas • Short-term temporal fluctuations up to 10 dB, spatial fluctuations < 5 dB • Wind band (>200 Hz) • Piggott is good guide, Wenz and Knudsen too low • Low fluctuations • Very little data processed above 3 kHz • Some information on temporal and spatial statistics • Very little on depth dependence

  13. Bay of Fundy - unpublished • < 200 Hz: • Noise levels follow EC-SWAN data for moderate to heavy shipping. • 200-800 Hz: • Amongst the highest levels measured on Scotian Shelf at these frequencies • Shallow water Wenz curves + 2 to 5 dB to account for spillage from high shipping noise • Depth dependence • Little based on modelling (energy-flux model)

  14. Examples of Signal Excess (10 km)

  15. Range inferences

  16. Conclusions • Right whales can be detected well beyond 10 km in range in the 100-200 Hz band. • Higher frequencies get lost in background noise ~10 km • Shipping noise a significant factor - directional sensors desirable for added range

More Related