1 / 29

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges)

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges). By Empanelled Agencies. About Us. EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation Assistance for Technical Education

lilac
Télécharger la présentation

Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana (Engineering Colleges)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Grading of Technical Institutions in the State of Haryana(Engineering Colleges) By Empanelled Agencies

  2. About Us • EQUATE = Effective Quality Upgradation Assistance for Technical Education • A national level Consultancy Organization set up expert academicians involved in planning, designing, implementing and facilitating World Bank funded technician/technical education projects for MHRD since 1990. • Supported by pool of eminent educationists, scholars and educational planners.

  3. About Us… EQUATE - brain child of Dr. R.N. Mathur, Founder President and Former Central Project Advisor, NPIU - More than 30 years in education sector - Contributed to a large number of Internationally funded Projects. As Head of NPIU, took initiative to launch Quality Movement in World Bank funded technician institutions in NE States - all the institutions achieved ISO 9001:2000 certification.

  4. Grading Objectives • Motivate the institution to enhance the quality of education. • Generate healthy academic competition among growing institutions • Enhance institutional image before the stakeholders • Enable the students during admission counseling to make clear effective choice of institution they prefer to study in and • Build the image of the Directorate of Technical Education, Government of Haryana as a quality provider of technical education in the country. EQUATE

  5. Methodology • Structured questionnaire designed separate questionnaire for new and old institutions • Institutional heads/representatives to be briefed about parameters of grading – Questionnaire to be handed over with request to fill in the required information before the visit of Expert Investigators (EI) • EIs will visit institutions for checking and verification of fact, figures and information – meet HODs, faculty, staff students, Administration and Finance Departments EQUATE

  6. Methodology • List of Documents to be collected by EIs provided at the end of questionnaire • List of Documents to be kept ready for verification and review by EEIs to be kept ready by the institution before the visit of the EI • Coordinator’s office to inform the schedule of visit of the EIs to institutions and Empanelled Agency in advance EQUATE

  7. Methodology • Five Broad Areas of Grading • Institutional Profile (70) • Governance, Leadership and Financial Management (150) • Infrastructure (150) • Human Resource (250) • Teaching Learning, Evaluation and Quality Assurance Processes (380) Total 1000 • EIs selected with care, thoroughly briefed by the Empanelled Agency • 2 EIs will visit institutions on mutually agreed dates EQUATE

  8. Methodology EQUATE

  9. Methodology • Institutions started in 2008-09 to provide data from date of establishment • Information to be provided as available up to or as on the date of the visit of the EIs • Response to the questionnaire as: • Tick mark • Figures or information on each item where space provided EQUATE

  10. Methodology • Scores will be calculated by EIs • Grades received to be Presented to Grading Finalization Committee by the Empanelled Agency • Institutions have option to get re-evaluated after 2-3 months within same academic year after initiating substantial improvements • Separate exercise to be taken up in new academic session EQUATE

  11. Broad Grading Criteria • Grading not an attempt to check if AICTE norms followed or not – institutions have to follow the AICTE norms in all circumstances • Quality and Progress related areas included in questionnaires EQUATE

  12. Broad Grading Criteria(1) Institutional Profile

  13. Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

  14. Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

  15. Broad Grading Criteria(2) INSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE, LEADERSHIP AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

  16. Broad Grading Criteria(3) INFRASTRUCTURE

  17. Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES

  18. Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES

  19. Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES

  20. Broad Grading Criteria(4)HUMAN RESOURCES

  21. Broad Grading Criteria(5) TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES

  22. Broad Grading Criteria(5)TEACHING LEARNING, EVALUATION & QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESSES

  23. Documents to be collected by Expert Investigators Team • Institutional recognition by AICTE. • University affiliation. • Composition of BOG of the Institute. • Minutes of the last 2 BOG meetings. • List of Head of Institution since starting. • Minutes of last two meeting of HODs with Head of Institution. • Delegation of financial power to Principal, HOD, Faculty. • Office order regarding library hours. • A copy of latest News Letter.

  24. Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team • Payroll of faculty and other staff • Match no. of labs with AICTE norms. • See documents indicating building maintaining committee or cell. • Equipments maintenance cell. • Fund availability in corpus fund. • No. of students receive free ship. • No. of students receive scholarship in current year.

  25. Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team • Involvement of faculty in purchasing. • Institutional strategic plan, vision, mission, Institutional quality policy. • Annual calendar of activities. • Working of Institutional MIS. • Campus wide networking and internet facilities. • Networking availability in hostels. • Check all infrastructure facility including cleanliness, power supply, power backup, condition of class rooms, common rooms, tutorial, library, administrative block, water supply. • Availability of digital library, internet facility in library.

  26. Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team • Availability of distance education and mechanism. • Hard copies and electronics journals. • Availability of stock register, lab manuals. • Check some appointments orders of faculty. • Check evidence of training conducted for faculty and other staff. • See orders for faculty qualification improvement with salary. • Evidence of consultancy projects.

  27. Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team • Evidence of incentive for innovative work. • Availability of Insurance, Provident Fund and Medical facilities. • Evidence of publication, patent, research projects, paper presentation, award for faculty. • Evidence of Revenue Generated and Utilization. • Student percentage of marks at admission. • Check foreign students if available. • Check attendance of class and sessionals. • Check no. of working days.

  28. Documents and facts to be reviewed by Experts Investigators Team • Documents of Alumni association. • Documents of tracer study. • Check all aspects of classroom strategy planning. • Check all facts related to competency and skills. • Check all evidence related to lab and workshops.

  29. THANK YOU EQUATE

More Related