1 / 48

Oracle 10 g Database Storage Demystified

Oracle 10 g Database Storage Demystified. Jeff Browning, O.C.P, R.H.C.A. Senior Manager Network Appliance, Inc. OracleWorld 2003 San Francisco. Agenda. A little history The notion of storage networking SAN and NAS Current-technology SAN: FCP Current-technology NAS: IP over GbE

lilah
Télécharger la présentation

Oracle 10 g Database Storage Demystified

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Oracle 10gDatabase StorageDemystified Jeff Browning, O.C.P, R.H.C.A.Senior ManagerNetwork Appliance, Inc. OracleWorld 2003 San Francisco

  2. Agenda • A little history • The notion of storage networking • SAN and NAS • Current-technology SAN: FCP • Current-technology NAS: IP over GbE • RAID: The “packaging” of hard disks • RAID0 • RAID1 • RAID4 • RAID5 • Combinations of RAID levels • Emerging storage technologies • ATA RAID • Serial ATA (SATA) • iSCSI • NFS v. 4 (NFS RDMA) • Conclusion and wrap up

  3. A Little History • IDE/ATA: The beginning • SCSI: A proliferation of standards • SCSI-1 • SCSI-2: The proliferation begins • SCSI-3: A new approach

  4. In the BeginningThere Was IDE/ATA • Introduced by IBM with the AT/PC in 1984 • Supported a master/slave concept • Enhanced and adopted by Compaq in 1986 with the Deskpro 386 as the IDE interface • ATA and IDE are now interchangeable terms

  5. What You Could Dowith an IDE/ATA Device:Not Much • IDE/ATA was slow (4 MB/s to start) • It didn’t support many devices(usually 2 hard drives) • It wasn’t reliable • But it was, and remains, very, very cheap • It was never used widely for databases

  6. SCSI: A Proliferation of Standards • Invented by Alan Shugart(founder of Seagate) in 1979 • Adopted as an ANSI standard in 1986 • First version was referred to as SCSI-1

  7. What You Could Dowith a SCSI-1 Device:A Bit More • SCSI-1 was still pretty slow (5 MB/s) • It supported 7 peripheral devices • It was more reliable than IDE/ATA • It was also more expensive • This was the first choice for Sun, HP and other open systems vendors and, notably, the Macintosh

  8. SCSI-2: The Proliferation Begins • Fast SCSI: Higher transfer speed(10 MB/s or higher) • Wide SCSI: Width of the bus wasincreased from 16 to 32 bits • More devices per bus (from 7 to 15) • Other improvements • Improved cables and connectors • Improved signaling • Active termination

  9. SCSI-3: A New Approach • With SCSI-3 the approach changed • Cabling and connection layer no longerdefined in the basic spec • So-called “interconnect” or “physicallayer” standards • SCSI-3 basic spec only defines acommand set and a communication protocol

  10. SCSI-3: The PhysicalLayer Standards

  11. The Notion of Storage Networking • SCSI provided a way to attach disks to a host • The need for sharing of disk and tape backup resources led to the idea of“shared SCSI”

  12. Storage Networking for Applications • Certain applications required shared disk • Shared SCSI evolved as a way to solve this problem

  13. Storage Networking Evolves • Storage networking evolved along two paths • SAN: With FCP being the dominant protocol • NAS: With Gigabit Ethernet (GbE) NAS became a viable alternative to FCP for many applications • The next section discusses the tradeoffs between these approaches

  14. SAN and NAS • Storage Area Networks (SAN) take the approach of making SCSI sharable • Network Attached Storage (NAS) uses existing file sharing protocols to connect databases to storage • Both approaches have their place: They are different

  15. Fibre Channel Emerges as Dominant SAN • Fibre Channel was designed as a SAN protocol • It was adopted as an ANSI standard in 1994 • It has emerged as the de facto standard for creating a SAN

  16. Typical Fibre Channel SAN

  17. Fibre Channel SAN Tradeoffs • Advantages • Bandwidth is good: 2 Gb FC is now common • Host CPU cost per I/O is comparable to SCSI • Latency is low and performance is good • Scalability is good • Disadvantages • More expensive than comparable IP network • Interoperability is poor but improving • Highly complex to setup and administer • Difficult to share disk capacity

  18. NAS Emerges as Alternative to SAN • NFS was created by Sun in in the early 1980s • Version 1 of NFS was widely regarded as inappropriate as a file sharing protocol for databases • Version 2 improved enough that Oracle certified NFS for Oracle datafiles in 1997 • Version 3 builds upon those improvements • Version 4 is emerging (more on this later)

  19. Typical IP/GbE NAS

  20. IP/GbE NAS Tradeoffs • Advantages • Bandwidth is pretty good using GbE • Switches/NICs are very inexpensive compared to FC switches/HBAs • Simple and easy to setup and administer • Interoperability is excellent • Disk capacity can be easily shared – even across platforms • Disadvantages • Host CPU cost may be higher than FC, depending on load, but not if the load is spindle-bound (NFS v. 4 fixes this in spades) • CPU Scalability (in the sense of CPU count)can be lower than FC (again NFS v. 4 addresses this)

  21. SAN vs. NAS Suitability • SAN • Suitable for high-end environments where latency, performance, or CPU cost per I/O are critical • Required by some applications where NAS is not supported • NAS • Suitable for low- or mid-end environments where performance or CPU cost is less important than$$ cost • Also suitable for some high-end environments where CPU is compute intensive, not I/O intensive • SAN and NAS are converging

  22. RAID: Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks • The problem: • Disks are fragile; they fail • Data is precious and must be protected • Tape or disk backup is too slow or too expensive • RAID provides a way to combine disks together with redundancy so that a single disk failure will not lose data • Hot spares and auto-promotion make this a viable long-term solution • Software RAID vs. hardware RAID

  23. RAID and Its Variants

  24. RAID0: Striping

  25. RAID0 Tradeoffs • Advantages: • Fastest type of RAID; leverages disks well • No disk overhead • Disadvantage: • A single disk loss is critical • Suitability • Any environment where performance is important, and you do not care about the data, e.g. Datamarts

  26. RAID1: Simple Mirroring

  27. RAID1: Simple Mirroring

  28. RAID1 Tradeoffs • Advantages: • Read capacity is higher than single disk (but lower than striping) • Very fault tolerant; all data is mirrored • Disadvantage: • Single disk capacity for writes • Two write per I/O penalty • Doubles disk cost • Suitability: • Very commonly used for online redo logs

  29. RAID0+1: Striping with Mirroring

  30. RAID0+1: Striping with Mirroring

  31. RAID1+0: Mirroring with Striping

  32. RAID1+0: Mirroring with Striping

  33. RAID0+1/RAID1+0 Tradeoffs • Advantages: • Read capacity is high; multiple disks are leveraged • Very fault tolerant; all data is mirrored • Disadvantage: • Two write per I/O penalty • Doubles disk cost • Suitability: • Very common for storing Oracle datafiles where redundancy is highly valued

  34. RAID4: Striping with Parity Disk

  35. RAID4: Striping with Parity Disk

  36. RAID4 Tradeoffs • Advantages: • Read Capacity is high; multiple disks are leveraged • Low RAID overhead; almost as good as RAID 0 • RAID protection exists • Disadvantage: • Two disks cannot be lost • Parity disk can become a bottleneck (some vendors avoid this issue with buffering, in which case performance is similar to RAID 1) • Suitability: • Very common for storing Oracle datafiles where redundancy is needed, and the cost of RAID0+1/RAID1+0 is too high

  37. RAID5: Striping with Striped Parity

  38. RAID5: Striping with Striped Parity

  39. RAID5 Tradeoffs • Advantages: • Read Capacity is high; multiple disks are leveraged • Low RAID overhead; almost as good as RAID 0 • RAID protection exists • Disadvantage: • Two disks cannot be lost • Slowest RAID; CPU cost of parity striping is high • Suitability: • Very common for storing Oracle datafiles where redundancy is needed, performance is not critical, and the cost of RAID0+1/RAID1+0 is too high

  40. Emerging Storage Technologies • ATA RAID • Serial ATA (SATA) • iSCSI • NFS v. 4 (NFS RDMA)

  41. ATA RAID • A repackaging of cheap ATA/IDE disks • Used as a tape backup substitute • Archive storage is on-line and accessible • Faster than tape • Almost as cheap as tape, or even cheaper if compression is used

  42. Serial ATA • An updating of the ATA/IDE spec to current technology • Intel and Dell • Targeted for desktops and next generation storage appliances • Could become a serious competitor to FCP and serial bus SCSI

  43. iSCSI • Implements SCSI-3 protocol over IP networks • Intel is a leader • Software initiators exist for Windows and Linux • HP-UX and AIX initiators are in public beta • Targets are available from a variety of vendors • Presently immature, but will become viable competitor to FCP • Key is TOE HBAs on both target and initiator • Effectively offloads host/target CPU from IP traffic • Cost per port for switches and HBAs is vastly cheaper than FCP • If performance becomes comparable, FCP could be toast

  44. Typical iSCSI SAN

  45. NFS v. 4 (NFS RDMA) • Basically, a rewrite of NFS • Focused on “local sharing” i.e., database customers and the like, who need to share data across a small, focused network with very good performance • Supports Read Direct Memory Access, a very high performance, low latency I/O protocol • Supports Infiniband as an I/O interface • Leaders are Network Appliance and Sun • Will provide a transparent performance upgrade path for NFS database customers

  46. Agenda • A little history • The notion of storage networking • SAN and NAS • Current-technology SAN: FCP • Current-technology NAS: IP over GbE • RAID: The “packaging” of hard disks • RAID0 • RAID1 • RAID4 • RAID5 • Combinations of RAID levels • Emerging storage technologies • ATA RAID • Serial ATA (SATA) • iSCSI • NFS v. 4 (NFS RDMA) • Conclusion and wrap up

  47. Wrap Up

More Related