html5-img
1 / 9

Conductor Development Project (CDP)

Conductor Development Project (CDP) Evaluating Nexans powders for Bi-2212 Round Wire Fabrication . Yibing Huang, Hanping Miao, Seung Hong, Michael Gerace and Jeff Parrell Oxford Superconducting Technology. Acknowledgements

lilka
Télécharger la présentation

Conductor Development Project (CDP)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conductor Development Project (CDP) Evaluating Nexans powders for Bi-2212 Round Wire Fabrication Yibing Huang, Hanping Miao, Seung Hong, Michael Gerace and Jeff Parrell Oxford Superconducting Technology Acknowledgements U.S. DOE –High Energy Physics CDP, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory & ASC - Florida State University EuCARD2 Meeting CERN, Dec. 12, 2013

  2. CDP Project Compare 3 powders recently produced by Nexans in Lot #82 with different particle size distributions Regular ultra-fine powder (d50 ~ 1 µm) Standard granulated powder with particle size of 200-500 µm Special granulated powder with narrower particle size in 100-200 µm

  3. Bi-2212 Wire Characterization Summary

  4. Wire Cross-Section Comparison PMM130723-1 (1mm, FF~29%) PMM130723-2 (200-500 mm, FF~22%) PMM130723-3 (100-200 mm, FF~23%) • Fill factor of the wires made of granulated powder is on purposely made lower than that of the regular ultra fine powder. • Wiresmade of the granulated powders have relatively higher homogeneity and less filament merges after drawn to final size.

  5. Regular Ultra Fine Powder Wire Cross-Section Comparison Wire from this work, FF ~29% Wire from old work, FF ~26% • Both wires were made withultra-fine powder (d50 ~ 1 µm) and the same process conditions. • Fill factor and filament merging appear different. • 16 hard particles per 60 sample cross-sections in samples from this work and none from wires with standard powder made in 2005.

  6. Granulated Powder Wire Cross-Section Comparison Wire from old work, 100-500 mm powder Wire from this work, 200-500 mm powder • No significant difference in fill factor between wires made of old and new powders. • Some hard particles were observed in the new wires, none in the wires made before 2007.

  7. Wire Performance Comparison • The JE performance is the similar in all three billets, showing that slightly better on wire PMM130723-2 by the granulated powder with particle size of 200-500 m. • The JE performance is similar for all three billets, • Jcis clearly higher in wires with the granulate powder.

  8. Hard Particles Observed in New Wires Ultra fine powder, ~1m) 0.8mm wire (granulated powder, 100-200 mm) • Hard particles are observed in all three new wires and the higher frequency of hard particles occurred in the wires with 1 mm and 100~200 mm powders. • Most of hard particle are 10~40 mm, not to causing wire breakage, but leading to filament merge. Some of them are slightly Bi-rich and Cu deficit. • Eliminating hard particle is important to keep wire uniformity and piece-length.

  9. Summary • All three wires are fabricated into single piece without breakage. • The JE performance is similar for all three billets, but Jc is clearly better on wires made of granulated powder. • Hard particles were observed in all three wires. • Need to remove the hard particle.

More Related