60 likes | 168 Vues
The Goals of Sports Medicine What are They and What Should They Be?. Christian Munthe Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University. Sports Medicine vs. Health Care. HC-goals Secure a certain level of health Prevention (public health, health information, preventive medicine)
E N D
The Goals of Sports Medicine What are They and What Should They Be? Christian Munthe Department of Philosophy, Göteborg University
Sports Medicine vs. Health Care • HC-goals • Secure a certain level of health • Prevention (public health, health information, preventive medicine) • Restoration (therapies, cures, rehabilitation) • Ailment (palliative medicine) • In a just way • SM-goals • Secure a level of health conducive to athletic performance • Involves the goals of HC, but goes beyond and differ from them • The level of health aimed for in SM typically goes beyond the one aimed for in HC • Involves also “enhancement” of the bodily functions of individuals • No apparent requirement of justice
The Dual Influences of SM • The “Ethos” of Traditional Medicine • Life & Quality of Life (primary but limited) • Autonomy (contested scope and strength) • Justice (contested policies) • The “Ethos” of Sports • Supreme performance and excellence (primary & unlimited) • Fairness (determined by policies/rules) • Autonomy (presupposed)
Rationing Health Care Resources • HC views • Need is paramount (combined with prognosis) • Provide for the worse off up to a certain level • Contested ideas about the relevance of numbers, but numbers relevant in some way. • Contested ideas about the relevance of merit and/or desert • SM-views • Unclear what is paramount: potential for supreme performance? (Fairness á la sports) • Providing of resources not limited by the same level as in HC • Numbers problematic (athletes a minority + conflict: elite vs. leisure sports) • Merit/Desert can work both ways • Sports injuries etc. self-inflicted • Sports heroes of great benefit to society
Contested Procedures: four lines of reasoning • “Doping”, nutrition, training methods, gene-technology etc. • Line 1 • SM should adapt to the “ethos” of HC (safety, justice) • Either: problematic since SM’s goals are different • Or: a reason for revising the goals of SM (and the practice of SM) • Line 2 • SM should adapt to the “ethos” of sports (excellence, fairness) • Either: problematic due to the rules and goals of sports being arbitrary from a medical point of view • Or: reason for breaking SM out of the HC context alltogether • Line 3 • Sports should adapt to the “ethos” of HC/SM ( determining fairness) • (If SM, this presupposes an “ethos” of SM independent of sports) • Medical safety an argument against doping etc. (but what safety level?) • Medical justice arguments against doping etc. • Line 4 • HC should adapt to the “ethos” of SM/Sports (safety, justice) • Either: extremely problematic due to the large differences • Or: reason for radical revision of the “ethos” of HC
Remarks and Reflections • What “ethos” - if any - is relevant for an ethics of SM? • What is the “place” of SM in society? • A Basic Problem for “ethos”-based ethics • Virtue oriented sports philosophy • Communitarian theories of justice • A Challenge for SM and Sports, but also for Medical Ethics • There is no given “archimedian point” • Inquiries into concrete, particular issues the way forward (?)