1 / 37

Lecture # 30

Lecture # 30. Review of lectures 8-14. Anthropological Linguistics. Definition: The evolution of language in human society and its role in the formation of culture is studied in anthropological linguistics. This is another aspect of language, society and culture.

ling
Télécharger la présentation

Lecture # 30

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lecture # 30 Review of lectures 8-14

  2. Anthropological Linguistics • Definition: The evolution of language in human society and its role in the formation of culture is studied in anthropological linguistics. • This is another aspect of language, society and culture.

  3. Anthropological Linguistics (contd..) • The structure of language has a social and cultural basis in the same way as other customs, conventions, and codes such as those related to dress and food. • Each culture organizes its world in its own way giving names to objects, identifying areas of significance or values and suppressing other areas.

  4. Anthropological Linguistics (contd..) • Anthropological studies have explored the relation between language and culture. • Language is invented to communicate and express a culture. • The language begins to determine the way we think and see the world

  5. Literary Stylistics • Definition: The study of the style of literary texts • Taking the view of register (language used in different fields – religious sermons, sports commentary, law etc.), we can study the styles of literary texts. • We may describe its features at levels of phonology, syntax, lexis, etc.

  6. Stylistics (contd..) • We distinguish one text from the other • We appreciate how it achieves some special features and effects through the use of language. • This kind of study is termed as ‘Literary stylistics’

  7. Stylistics (contd…) • The writers try to link ‘what’ is being said with ‘how it is being said’ • It is through the latter that writers can fully convey their complex ideas and feelings • Stylistic analysis also helps in better understanding of how metaphor, irony, paradox, ambiguity etc. operate in literary texts (they are effects of language and building up of a coherent linguistic structure)

  8. Neurolinguistics (contd..) • Neurolinguistics is the study of the neural mechanisms in the human brain that control the comprehension, production, and acquisition of language. • As an interdisciplinary field, neurolinguistics draws methodology and theory from fields such as neuroscience, linguistics, cognitive science, neurobiology, communication disorders, neuropsychology and computer science.

  9. Neurolinguistics (contd..) • Later, Carl Wernicke, after whom Wernicke’s area is named, proposed that different areas of the brain were specialized for different linguistic tasks. • Broca's area specialized at handling the motor production of speech, and Wernicke's area handling auditory speech comprehension

  10. Summary • Anthropological Linguistics The evolution of language in human society and its role in the formation of culture • Literary Stylistics The study of the style of literary texts • Neurolinguistics the study of the neural mechanisms in the human brain that control the comprehension, production, and acquisition of language.

  11. Some basic distinctions The most influential: • American school of structural anthropologists – Leonard Bloomfield & after World War II, Noam Chomsky • The European linguists, chiefly among them the Swiss linguist Ferdinand De Saussure

  12. Some basic distinctions The most influential: • American school of structural anthropologists – Leonard Bloomfield & after World War II, Noam Chomsky • The European linguists, chiefly among them the Swiss linguist Ferdinand De Saussure

  13. Langue/parole distinction • An individual makes use of his knowledge (langue) to produce actual sentences (parole) • Individuals can communicate with each other because they share the same langue. • Individuals produce different sentences based on the same langue

  14. Competence and Performance • Noam Chomsky, an American linguist made similar distinction between competence & performance • Competence- native speaker’s knowledge of his language (mastery of the system of the system of rules) • Performance – production of actual sentences in use in real-life situations

  15. Competence & performance • Speaker’s knowledge of the structure of language is the speaker’s linguist’s competence. • The way a speaker uses it- his linguistic performance • Competence – set of principles • Performance – what a speaker does • Competence – kind of code • Performance – the act of encoding or decoding

  16. Competence and performance • Moreover, it is not easier to study performance through recording by audio and video devices. • Study of parole gives us data that makes us understand langue and competence better.

  17. Sign/ symbol distinction • Language is a system of symbolic signs since there are often very complex associative relationships between the signifiers and the signifieds in a language • Signifiers and signified operate in their relationship with each other

  18. Sign/symbol distinction Saussure’s contributions • Saussure exerted two kinds of influence on modern linguistics: First, he provided a general orientation, a sense of the task of linguistics which has seldom been questioned. • Second, he influenced modern linguistics in the specific concepts.

  19. Sign/symbol distinction Saussure’s contributions • Many of the developments of modern linguistics can be described as his concept, i.e. his idea of the arbitrary nature of the sign, langue vs. parole, synchrony vs. diachrony, syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, etc.

  20. Sign/symbol distinctions Saussure’s contributions Saussure’s contribution regarding the concepts of sign & symbol distinction brought a new revolution and enjoys a prime importance in the domain of modern linguistics

  21. Sign & Symbol distinction • Language made of signs • Linguistic sign has two parts – Signifier & Signified • That which signifies (the word) – Signifier • That which is signified (the concept) – Signified • Sign – composite of both, it consists of the relationship between signifier & signified

  22. Sign/symbol distinction • That is why we say that language is a system of symbolic signs since there are often very complex associative relationships between the signifiers and the signifieds in a language • Signifiers and signified operate in their relationship with each other

  23. Sign/symbol distinction Saussure’s contributions • Many of the developments of modern linguistics can be described as his concept, i.e. his idea of the arbitrary nature of the sign, langue vs. parole, synchrony vs. diachrony, syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, etc.

  24. Sign/symbol distinction Saussure’s contributions Saussure’s contribution regarding the concepts of sign & symbol distinction brought a new revolution and enjoys a prime importance in the domain of modern linguistics

  25. Structure/system distinction • Two intersecting threads build up fabric of language. • Language has duality of structure. • At one level we select the elements out of many, at another level, we combine these elements to form a structural unit • With a limited number of elements, we can construct a large number of combinations

  26. Structure/system distinction • System – set of paradigmatic relationships between elements • Structure – set of syntagmatic relationships between elements at each level in the language • At level of sounds – phonological system (vowels & consonants) & phonological structure ( determining combination of vowels & consonants)

  27. Structure/system distinction • At level of sentence- formation, we have syntactic system (word classes such as noun, verb, adjective, adverb) & syntactic structure (determining combination of these word classes) to enable formation of sentences

  28. Structure/system distinction • Substance and symbols (letters of the alphabet) are raw material of language • They become meaningful when given a particular shape or order. • At one level we consider only the form or shape • At another we consider the level of meaning

  29. Structure/system distinction • A combination of both gives us a meaningful form. Diachronic & Synchronic Approaches • Diachronic approach related with development of language over different ages • Synchronic approach related with the shape of language at a specific time without considering its shape in the past or future

  30. Generativism • Developed by Noam Chomsky & followers in 1950s. • Came as a reaction to behaviourism • Chomsky asserted that language is free from stimulus control • Creativity is a human attribute which distinguishes men from machines

  31. Generativism • Generativismis an integrated whole in which the technical details of formalization are on a par with a number of logically unconnected ideas about language and the philosophy of science. • Language free from stimulus control • Human can produce variety of utterances

  32. Generativism • It’s a rule governed creativity. • We produce utterances with a certain grammatical structure. • Generativism different from Bloomfieldian and Post-Bloomfieldian structuralism. • They emphasized on the structural diversity • Generativists interested in similarities in languages

  33. Generativism • Chomsky gives importance to the formal properties of languages & to the nature of the rules that their description requires. • Human language faculty is innate and species –specific • Another difference – Competence and performance.

  34. Ganarative Grammar • Generative grammar is set of rules which, operating upon a finite vocabulary of units , generates a set of (finite or infinite) strings, which is well formed in the language that is characterized by the grammar. • The word ‘generate’ does not relate to any process of sentence production

  35. Generative Grammar • A generative grammar is the specification of the grammatical structure of the sentences that it generates. • Grammar of a particular language is a system of rules & principles that link sounds and meaning • human beings are endowed with a number of special faculties (mind)

  36. Generative Grammar • Chomsky says that there are certain phonological, syntactic and semantic units that are universal. • Human beings are independent of any external stimuli • All human languages are similar in structure. • All human languages make reference to the properties and objects of the physical world

  37. Generative Grammar • grammatical similarities between widely separated and historically unrelated languages are as important as their differences.

More Related