1 / 14

Fine-tuning the Instructional Design System for Distance Learning

Fine-tuning the Instructional Design System for Distance Learning. Lawrence C. Ragan and Rick Shearer Penn State’s World Campus. Describe the early days. 1996- University-wide study team Late summer 1997--go ahead for “virtual university” 4 months to put 4 courses online

liv
Télécharger la présentation

Fine-tuning the Instructional Design System for Distance Learning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Fine-tuning the Instructional Design System for Distance Learning Lawrence C. Ragan and Rick Shearer Penn State’s World Campus

  2. Describe the early days • 1996- University-wide study team • Late summer 1997--go ahead for “virtual university” • 4 months to put 4 courses online • First delivery in January ‘98 • Built upon existing DE system but integrated into mainstream

  3. How We Did It • “What it takes” approach • “Make it up as you go” • No repeatable experiences • Creativity and innovation rule • Lots of fun but . . . high stress

  4. Pressure Points • Mass exodus of 1999-2000 • Increased number of programs • Push for more, faster, cheaper • Awareness of need for systemization • Integration issues with mainstream (selection of University-wide LMS) • Integration of product lines

  5. Attempts to Systemize First steps

  6. Strategic Questions • How much does it cost? • How long does it take? • How should the system work? • How does the system work? • How does the system NOT work?

  7. STRATEGIC ANSWER I don’t know!

  8. Strategic Steps • Process analysis • “Systems Design/Approach” • Task analysis • Budgeting and management steps • Roles and responsibilities

  9. Process Analysis • Look at production process from beginning to end • Look at interactions between units involved • Identify stress points

  10. “Systems Design/Approach” • Defined common design template (format) • Content model (relationship to LMS) • Standardization of ID system Faculty Intake Form Timeline and management processes • Content Asset Storage Environment (CASE) • Interval Development Cycle • Launch Meeting • Design Definition Documents • New Program Meetings (WC-wide)

  11. Task Analysis • Roles and Responsibilities • More clearly defined need for project leadership • Delineated job tasks

  12. Budget and Management Steps • Constructed system for tracking time-on-projects (billable hours) • Assigned defined number of hours to tasks • Defined role of IDs to manage projects • Established role of Resource Managers

  13. Roles and Responsibilities • Clear(er) definition of who does what and when • How to hold people accountable for task completion • Provide for personal growth and professional development

  14. Current Directions/Stress Points • Modular approach for multiple delivery • Blended and hybrid programming • Further integration with mainstream University • Content management scheme

More Related