1 / 22

European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM

European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM. Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University. Sink Modeling Status. EU Commission 2002: Potential of European sinks from both agriculture and forestry unclear

loan
Télécharger la présentation

European Carbon Sinks Modeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. European Carbon SinksModeling Status, Data, Analytical Gaps, EUFASOM Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University

  2. Sink Modeling Status • EU Commission 2002: Potential of European sinks from both agriculture and forestry unclear • Fast analysis needed for • International negotiation of Kyoto Protocol (define own position and understand others) • EU emission trading system

  3. EU Emission Trading - Sinks • No initial allowance to use credits from carbon sinks projects such as forestry to meet emission targets • Review of the emissions trading directive in 2006: if reporting and accounting uncertainties surrounding sinks can be lifted, it leaves open the possibility of using the credits from 2008.

  4. Integrated Sink Enhancement Assessment (INSEA) Project • Funded by European Commission to address analytical gap of carbon sinks in European Agricultural and Forestry • January 2004 – July 2006

  5. Common Data • Soil • Forests • Climate • Technologies • Markets • Model Results Geographical Analysis • Biophysical Models • EPIC • PICUS • Economic Models • Hohenheim • AROPAJ • EFI • EU-FASOM • AGRIPOL INSEA Model Structure

  6. Available Data • Soils (MOSES, JRC) • Climate (MARS) • Forest Inventories (EFI) • Conventional Management (FADN, EUROCARE, EUROSTAT, IIASA) Problems: Confidentiality restrictions, Data quality, Property rights

  7. Soil DataSource: Luca Montanarella, Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy

  8. Analytical and Data Gaps • Farm level impacts of alternative agricultural and forest management • Costs • Inputs • Outputs • Environmental Impacts

  9. Addressing the Gaps • Engineering Analysis • Link to other (European) projects • GREENGRASS - Sources and Sinks of Greenhouse Gases from managed European Grasslands and Mitigation Strategies • CARBOINVENT - Multi-Source Inventory Methods For Quantifying Carbon Stocks And Stock Changes In European Forests • MIDAIR - Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for Organic and Conventional Dairy Production • CARBO-AGE - Age-related dynamics of carbon exchange in European forests

  10. European Non-Food Agriculture (ENFA) Project • Starting in 2005 • Includes detailed biofuel analysis • Environmental impact analysis consistent with food options • Integration in EUFASOM • Analysis of fuel directives

  11. Benefits for North American Sink Analysis • Refinement of European Data in global models • Parallel links, i.e. USFASOM and EUFASOM • Extrapolation of European Strategies currently not modeled in US

  12. European Forest and Agricultural Sector Model (EU-FASOM) • Model built from scratch • Uses conceptual approach of (US)-FASOM • Mathematical programming based optimization model • Partial equilibrium

  13. EU-FASOM - Deviations from USFASOM • Texture based land quality classifications • Rotations vs. individual crops • Dynamic soil carbon rates • Validation

  14. Dynamic Soil Carbon Coefficients • Soil-climate-regime andsoilmanagement history determines soil carbon coefficients • Various strategies can be a source or sink depending on the carbon level of the associated land unit

  15. Why changing coefficients?

  16. Problem of Dimensionality • Consider a forward looking decision model with 20 alternative soil management practices and 30 time periods • The number of possible management sequences equals 2030 ~ 1E+39 • Many models yield more combinations (regions, crops, …)

  17. Technical Implementation • Details available in paper available from author • X = land use variable • S = Soil carbon variable • t = time index • r = region index • i = soil type index • u = land use index • o = soil carbon class index • s = sequestration coefficient • c = carbon content coefficient • = soil carbon class transistion probability

  18. Soil Carbon Class Distribution Calculation of probabilities is not shown but available in the paper Soil Carbon Levels

  19. Soil Carbon Change a) b)

More Related