1 / 110

2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469

Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Supplemental Packet. Statewide, 74.9% of students who started 9 th grade in 2009 graduated by June 2013, while 15.1% of students were still enrolled. 2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469.

lok
Télécharger la présentation

2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Graduation Rates:Students Who Started 9th Gradein 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009Supplemental Packet

  2. Statewide,74.9% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by June2013, while 15.1% of students were still enrolled. 2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469 All Students in Public Schools 2

  3. In the districts outside of NYC,82.6% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by June2013, while 9.1% of students were still enrolled. 2009 Total Cohort Students = 139,748 All Students in Public Schools outside of NYC 3

  4. Statewide, 77.8% of students who started 9th grade in 2009 graduated by August2013, while 12.3% were still enrolled. 2009 Total Cohort Students = 218,469 All Students in Public Schools 4

  5. For students who entered 9th grade in 2009, inclusion of August 2013 graduates increased the statewide graduation rate by more than 2 percentage points compared to the June2013 rateFor this cohort, statewide,6,236 students earned diplomas in August 2013. 5

  6. Statewide the percentage of graduates earning a Regents, Advanced Regents, or Local Diploma Four Years Five Years Six Years 6

  7. Statewide Percentage of Students Statewide Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 224,822 • 2006 224,744 • 2007 223,285 • 2008 221,366 • 2009 218,469 7 7

  8. Statewide Achievement Gap Data

  9. Graduation rates by credential awarded, All Public Schools The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 86.5% 85.7% 85.1% 59.7% 59.2% 57.8% 58.4% 58.0% 58.1% 2007 2009 2008 9 The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

  10. Big 4 District graduation rates by credential awarded The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 61.6% 63.8% 63.5% 52.7% 50.2% 52.9% 48.3% 45.9% 48.6% 2009 2008 2007 10 The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

  11. Buffalo graduation rates by credential awarded The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 67.4% 64.0% 62.7% 52.4% 51.9% 44.1% 43.7% 44.3% 35.1% 2007 2008 2009 11 The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

  12. Rochester graduation rates by credential awarded The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 58.5% 57.8% 57.8% 43.9% 43.9% 43.4% 42.1% 40.4% 38.1% 2008 2009 2007 12 The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

  13. Syracuse graduation rates by credential awarded The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 57.1% 53.7% 53.3% 49.8% 46.4% 46.7% 45.5% 38.7% 34.3% 2007 2009 2008 13 The cohort graduation rate is presented at the top of each column. The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding.

  14. Yonkers graduation rates by credential awarded The percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents or Regents Diplomawith Advanced Designation, selected racial/ethnic groups after 4 years 77.6 77.1% 75.1% 65.0% 66.1% 65.5% 59.3% 57.0% 56.0% 2009 2007 2008 14

  15. The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four Years For Black v. White Students and Hispanic v. White StudentsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 15

  16. The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in New York City The graduation rate and credentials earned achievement gap in New York City is generally similar to the statewide trend. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 16

  17. The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Buffalo As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 17

  18. The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Rochester As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 18

  19. The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Syracuse As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 19

  20. The achievement gap for Black and Hispanic Students compared to White Students in Yonkers As a percent of the cohort, more White Students graduated with a Regents or Advanced Designation Diploma; more Black and Hispanic Students graduated with a Local Diploma. Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning Credentials after Four YearsPositive values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was lower than for White students Negative values indicate the rate for Black/Hispanic students was higher than for White students Black v. White Hispanic v. White 20

  21. The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students) Big 4* = Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers combined. 21

  22. The Graduation Rate Achievement Gap between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Graduating after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students) 22

  23. Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Black and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Black Students was lower than for White Students) 23

  24. Regents with Advanced Designation Diplomas - the gaps between Hispanic and White students for NYC, the Big 4, and Statewide Percentage Point Difference in Percentage of Cohort Earning a Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation after Four Years(Positive values indicate the rate for Hispanic Students was lower than for White Students) 24

  25. Achievement Gap in Percentage Between English Language Learners and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohort through June 25

  26. Achievement Gap in Percentage Between Students with Disabilities and All Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Percentage Point Difference for Graduates in the Cohort through June 26

  27. NYC and Big Four City School Districts

  28. New York City Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 77,378 • 78,346 • 79,476 • 79,719 • 78,721 28 28

  29. Buffalo Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June Because of a one-time change in 8th grade promotion policy, the 2005 and 2006 total cohort enrollments in Buffalo are significantly smaller and larger, respectively, than earlier cohorts. Cohort size decreased again for the 2007 Cohort. • Cohort Membership • 2005 2,248 • 3,479 • 2,653 • 2,948 • 2,630 29 29

  30. Rochester Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 2,924 • 2,670 • 2,873 • 2,564 • 2,399 30 30

  31. Syracuse Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 1,528 • 1,571 • 1,673 • 1,547 • 1,552 31 31

  32. Yonkers Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5 and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 2,072 • 1,673 • 1,858 • 1,814 • 1,857 32 32

  33. Percentage of NYC’s and Large City Districts’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4 Years Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June * Large City Districts include: Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Yonkers 33

  34. Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Results of Graduates in the Cohorts through June 34

  35. Percentage of NYC and Big Four Cities’ Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four Years Results of Graduates in the 2008 and 2009 Cohorts through June and August 35

  36. Buffalo City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding. 59.1% 58.0% 54.0% 53.4% 53.0% 52.5% 52.1% Cohort Membership 2006 3,479 2007 2,653 2,948 2,630 47.4% 46.8% Four Years Five Years Six Years 36

  37. Rochester City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding. 58.0% 56.2% 54.7% 54.0% 51.7% 46.1% 45.5% Cohort Membership 2006 2,670 2,873 2,564 2,399 43.4% 43.0% Four Years Five Years Six Years 37

  38. Syracuse City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding. 58.1% 56.4% 55.9% 54.2% 53.9% 48.8% 48.0% 48.4% Cohort Membership 2006 1,571 2007 1,673 2008 1,547 2009 1,552 45.9% Four Years Five Years Six Years 38

  39. Yonkers City School District, the percentage of cohort members earning a Local, Regents, or Regents with Advanced Designation Diploma Note: The overall rate may not equal the sum of each diploma type due to rounding. 75.9% 74.8% 74.4% 72.2% 71.2% 66.4% 66.0% 66.2% 63.2% • Cohort Membership • 2006 1,673 • 2007 1,858 • 2008 1,814 • 2009 1,857 Five Years Four Years Six Years 39

  40. Graduation Rates by Need/Resource Group For Four, Five and Six Years

  41. New York City Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June Cohort Membership 2005 77,378 2006 78,346 2007 79,476 2008 79,719 2009 78,721 41 41

  42. Large City Districts Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June Cohort Membership 2005 8,983 2006 9,536 2007 9,057 2008 8,873 2009 8,438 42

  43. High Need Urban-Suburban Districts Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 16,964 • 2006 16,666 • 2007 16,517 • 2008 16,037 • 2009 16,098 43

  44. High Need Rural Districts Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 14,758 • 2006 14,262 • 2007 14,135 • 2008 13,501 • 2009 12,734 44

  45. Average Need Districts Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June • Cohort Membership • 2005 72,316 • 2006 71,230 • 2007 69,517 • 2008 68,042 • 2009 66,534 45

  46. Low Need Districts Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June Cohort Membership 2005 33,616 2006 33,693 2007 33,468 2008 33,566 2009 33,729 46

  47. Districts Outside New York City Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After 4, 5, and 6 Years Results Through June Cohort Membership 2005 147,444 2006 146,398 2007 143,809 2008 141,647 2009 139,748 47

  48. Results for Students by Race/Ethnicity and Gender 48

  49. Cohort Memberships by Race/Ethnicity and Gender2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 CohortsAll Public Schools

  50. Graduation Rate by Race/Ethnicity Percentage of Students Graduating with Regents or Local Diploma After Four YearsThrough June 50

More Related