1 / 19

Another Look at the Use of Maximum Potential Intensity of Tropical Cyclones

Another Look at the Use of Maximum Potential Intensity of Tropical Cyclones. Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/ StAR , Fort Collins, CO NCAR/NOAA/CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop 16 November 2011 CIRA, Fort Collins, CO. Introduction.

london
Télécharger la présentation

Another Look at the Use of Maximum Potential Intensity of Tropical Cyclones

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Another Look at the Use of Maximum Potential Intensity of Tropical Cyclones Andrea Schumacher, CIRA/CSU, Fort Collins, CO Mark DeMaria and John Knaff, NOAA/NESDIS/StAR, Fort Collins, CO NCAR/NOAA/CSU Tropical Cyclone Workshop 16 November 2011 CIRA, Fort Collins, CO

  2. Introduction • Maximum potential intensity (MPI) • Upper bound to TC intensity • Important quantity to know when predicting TC intensity • Approaches • Empirical • Theory • Modeling (not discussed here)

  3. Empirical MPI • Atlantic (DeMaria and Kaplan 1994) • Clim SST/Vmax sample from 1962-1992 • Fit upper bound of Vmax (least squares, exponential) • A = 28.2, B = 55.8, C = 0.1813,T0 = 30.0 °C • T in °C • V given in ms-1 • E. Pacific (Whitney and Hobgood 1997) • Clim SST/Vmax sample from 1963-1993 • Fit upper bound of Vmax (least squares, linear) • C0 = -79.17 ms-1, C1 = 5.36 ms-1 • SST in °C • EPMPI given in ms-1

  4. MPI Theory • Two main thermodynamic theories • Carnot heat engine (Emanuel 1986; 1991) • Acquire enthalpy from the ocean • Convert to wind energy • Function of sea surface and storm outflow temperature • Calculates MPI as a maximum surface wind speed • Eye subsidence (Miller 1958 and Holland 1996) • Requires SST, atmospheric sounding and surface pressure • Calculates MPI as a minimum central pressure

  5. Motivation – Predicting Intensity • Current version of Statistical Hurricane Intensity Prediction Scheme (SHIPS) uses empirical MPI as a predictor • Pros: • Availability (function of SST only) • Cons: • Small sample set – 31 years • Doesn’t include atmospheric variables • Only uses SST – no ocean structure (e.g., OHC) • Doesn’t always serve as true “upper bound” to Vmax…

  6. Motivation (Cont…) • Sometimes, Vmax > theoretical MPI • Example: Hurricane Celia 2010

  7. Project Goals • Re-examine empirical formulas using 1982-2010 SHIPS sample set – valid? • Examine Emanuel’s theoretical MPI (1995) over the SHIPS dataset • Identify when valid / not valid • Create a combined theoretical / empirical formula for MPI in SHIPS

  8. SHIPS Empirical MPI Validation1982-2010 10653 cases total Vmax > MPI for 30 cases (0.3%)  Good upper bound for sample 13003 cases total Vmax > MPI for 8 cases (0.1%)  Good upper bound for sample

  9. Emanuel MPI* in SHIPS1982-2010 Vmax > MPI 12% of cases Vmax > MPI 16% of cases First, try a few simple improvements... *Note: Atmospheric sounding comes from GFS model.

  10. Asymmetry Adjustment • Vmax includes asymmetric adjustment, MPI does not • For proper comparison, remove asymmetric component from storm motion (Schewerdt): Vmax(adjusted) = Vmax – 1.5*(TC speed)0.63 TC Motion Symmetric Vortex Asymmetric Vortex

  11. Emanuel MPI+ Asymmetry Adjustment Vmax > MPI 10% of cases Vmax > MPI 14% of cases

  12. Improved Reduction Factor • Emanuel MPI assumes 700-mb winds reduced by factor of 0.8 at surface (friction) • Franklin et al. (2002) used dropwinsonde data to show reduction factor is closer to 0.9 • Multiplied Emanuel MPI by 0.9/0.8

  13. Emanuel MPI + Asymmetry Adjustment + Improved Reduction Factor Vmax > MPI 9% of cases Vmax > MPI 11% of cases

  14. Observed VmaxExceeds Theoretical MPI. Why? When?

  15. Environmental Differences - Atlantic “Violators” have… • Higher intensity, weakening • Lower MPI, decreasing • Lower SST, decreasing • Larger low-level temperature gradient • Lower OHC • Higher latitude

  16. Standardized differences

  17. Standardized differences (12-hr tendency)

  18. Summary • Empirical MPI provides good upper bound for intensity • SHIPS parameter based on Emanuel theoretical MPI improved by • Adding asymmetry adjustment due to storm motion • Using more appropriate reduction factor when converting 700-mb winds to surface

  19. Future Work • Objectively identifying conditions where Emanuel MPI should be adjusted or replaced with empirical • Fast-moving TCs moving over cooler SST/OHC, lack of equilibrium • Extratropical cases (Atlantic) • Annular cases (E Pacific) • Creating combination empirical/theoretical MPI for testing in SHIPS • Parameterizing SST change under inner core • Decrease MPI

More Related