1 / 17

TYPES OF STUDIES IN DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY

TYPES OF STUDIES IN DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY. TYPES OF STUDIES BASED ON:. Purpose Time Cost Feasibility. TYPES OF STUDY. Observational Descriptive Analytical Cross-sectional Retrospective Prospective Experimental Clinical Trial Community Intervention Trial Field Trial.

lore
Télécharger la présentation

TYPES OF STUDIES IN DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TYPES OF STUDIES IN DIABETES EPIDEMIOLOGY

  2. TYPES OF STUDIES BASED ON: • Purpose • Time • Cost • Feasibility

  3. TYPES OF STUDY Observational Descriptive Analytical • Cross-sectional • Retrospective • Prospective Experimental • Clinical Trial • Community Intervention Trial • Field Trial

  4. A STUDY DESIGN FOR THE OUTCOMES OF DIABETES • Diabetes • Morbidity (Complications) • Mortality (Death) • Economics • Treatment • Education • Prevention & Control • Intervention

  5. TIME AND TYPES OF STUDY PAST PRESENT FUTURE Retrospective Cross-sectional Prospective Time

  6. PRESENT Cross-sectional Time CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY

  7. ANALYTICAL STUDY A cross-sectional study: • Privides a snap shot • Is simple • Provides associated factor • Is first line of epidemiologic research

  8. CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY What is different about: • DM • Morbidity (Complications) • Mortality (Death) How is it different about: • SES • Age at onset • Season

  9. Korea Japan Kuwait Israel England Canada Netheland Denmark Pittsburgh, USA Scotland Sweden Finland CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY Incidence /100,000

  10. PRESENT Disease PAST Time RETROSPECTIVE STUDY Determining differences in: • Life style • Diet • Reproductive on • Medication • Family Hx • Genetics

  11. Suitable for rare diseases Inexpensive Minimal ethical problems Short study time Small # of subjects Subjects need not volunteer Susceptable to selection & memory bias Inconsistency: definitions of symptoms or diseases may have been modified over time. Can not determine incidence Limitations in data Relative risk approximation RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: PROS & CONS PRO CON

  12. Retinopathy+ Future Retinopathy- Time PROSPECTIVE STUDY PRESENT DM Risk factors???

  13. Less variability to bias No recall necessary Incidence determined Relative risk accurate Consistent disease definitions & symptoms. Longer time Common disease only Expensive Ethical concern A high drop-out rate Volunteers needed A large # of subjects needed The Hawthorne-effect PROSPECTIVE STUDY: PROS & CONS PRO CON

  14. CROSS-SECTIONAL Understand RETROSPECTIVE Estimate risk factors PROSPECTVE Validate risk factors TYPES OF STUDIES AND GOALS Prevention-Control-Intervention-Education-Management

  15. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY • Animal • Drug trials • Human

  16. Exercise Diet Outcome evaluation Drug EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Randomized Clinical Trial:DPP Random Selection

  17. Outcome evaluation EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Cross-over design

More Related