1 / 12

Coronal Shock Formation in Various Ambient Media

IHY-ISWI Regional Meeting Heliophysical phenomena and Earth's environment 7-13 September 2009, Šibenik, Croatia. Coronal Shock Formation in Various Ambient Media. Tomislav Žic, Bojan Vršnak Hvar Observatory , Faculty o f Geodesy , Kačićeva 26 , HR-10000 Zagreb

lori
Télécharger la présentation

Coronal Shock Formation in Various Ambient Media

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IHY-ISWI Regional MeetingHeliophysical phenomena and Earth's environment7-13 September 2009, Šibenik, Croatia Coronal Shock Formation in Various Ambient Media Tomislav Žic, Bojan Vršnak Hvar Observatory, Faculty of Geodesy, Kačićeva 26, HR-10000 Zagreb Manuela Temmer, Astrid Veronig Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5/II, 8010 Graz, Austria

  2. Introduction • Coronal MHD shock waves are closely associated with flares or CMEs • Necessary requirement: a motion perpendicular to the magnetic field lines (the source volume-expansion)  large amplitude perturbation in the ambient plasma • the source region expansion is investigated in the cylindrical and spherical coordinate system • 2D & 3D piston  driver of an MHD shock wave • constant piston acceleration (duration of an acceleration phase is tmax, and the maximum expansion velocity vmax) • environment dependent on radial distance! • speed of low-amplitude perturbation w0(r) : • constant • 1/r • 1/r2 • two cases: high  sound & low  MHD T. Žic et al.

  3. Intention Piston expansion and wave-front propagation • Our interest: the shock-formation time/distance due to the non-linear wavefront evolution  larger-amplitude elements propagate faster;[Landau, L.D. and Lifshitz, E.M.: Fluid Mechanics, (Pergamon Press, 1987)] • Energy conservation  signal amplitude is decreasing with distance  difference from 1D model (!)[Vršnak, B. and Lulić, S., Solar Phys., 196 (2000) 157-180(24)] T. Žic et al.

  4. Model • Source-surface speed, v(t), at certain time t is defined by: • initial velocity v0, • final velocity vmax • acceleration time tmax • Kinetic energy conservation has been taken into account; e.g. for >> 1: r u2w Ra = const.g(u) Ra = const. • ( = 1  cylindrical;  = 2  spherical) • generally, g(u) depends on characteristics of the ambient plasma, primarily on the value of ; we consider << 1 and >> 1 T. Žic et al.

  5. discontinuity = shock rw* Non-linear wavefront evolution • velocity and position of a given wavefront segment (“signal”) are defined by: w(t) = drw(t)/dt w(t) = w0(r) + k u(t) T. Žic et al.

  6. Solving differential equations • Taking into account the energy conservation and w(u) we find: • with the flow velocity boundary condition: u0≡u(t0) = v(t0);[the source velocity at the moment t0 is equal to the speed of the source-surface, v(t0)] • where: • u0, r0 and g0 stand for values at initial moment t0; when a given wave segment is created • a= 1 in the cylindrical coordinate system • a= 2 in the spherical coordinate system T. Žic et al.

  7. Example of the wave-front propagation and determination of the time/distanceshock formation for w0 = 500 km/s T. Žic et al.

  8. Shock-formation time (t*) and distance (rw) for w00(r) T. Žic et al.

  9. Shock-formation time (t*) and distance (rw) for w01(r) T. Žic et al.

  10. Shock-formation time (t*) and distance (rw) for w02(r) T. Žic et al.

  11. Results and conclusion • The results show that the shock-formation time t∗ and the shock-formation distance rw∗ are: • approximately proportional to the acceleration phase duration tmax, • shorter for a higher source speed vmax, • only weakly dependent on the initial source size rp0, • shorter for a higher source acceleration a, and • lower in an environment characterized by steeper decrease of w0 T. Žic et al.

  12. Questions? Thank you for your attention

More Related