1 / 12

Pamela A. Moise-Broder Alan Forrest Jerome J. Schentag

Relationship between Time to Eradication in vivo & Bactericidal Activity in vitro of Vancomycin for MRSA Infections. Pamela A. Moise-Broder Alan Forrest Jerome J. Schentag CPL Associates, LLC; University of the Pacific; SUNY Buffalo School of Pharmacy. Objective.

lucas-haynes
Télécharger la présentation

Pamela A. Moise-Broder Alan Forrest Jerome J. Schentag

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Relationship between Time to Eradication in vivo & BactericidalActivity in vitro of Vancomycin for MRSA Infections Pamela A. Moise-Broder Alan Forrest Jerome J. Schentag CPL Associates, LLC; University of the Pacific; SUNY Buffalo School of Pharmacy

  2. Objective • Relationship between time to MRSA eradication in vivo and the in vitro bactericidal activity of vancomycin • Activity of vancomycin in vitro • Probability of microbiologic success • All-cause mortality

  3. Methods • 34 patients with MRSA bacteremia • Free of endocarditis, osteomyelitis or CNS infection • Vancomycin monotherapy • Target 1hr “peak” concentrations, 28-32 g/mL • Target trough concentrations, 8-12 g/mL • 24-h time-kill curves performed • Initial inoculum ~107 to 108 CFU/mL • Vancomycin concentration: 16 μg/mL

  4. Patient & Organism Characteristics

  5. Outcomes by Bactericidal Activity

  6. Time to Bacterial Eradication by Reduction in log10 CFU/mL Grouped by Tree-based Modeling 100 Reduction in log10 CFU/mL: <2.5 (n=13) >2.5 (n=21) 80 60 % Culture Positive 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 p=0.014 Time (Days)

  7. Non-Linear Relationship:Sigmoid Emax Model • P = Probability of coming to the event (eradication) • Po = Probability of success as LogDec approaches 0 • Pmax = Asymptotic maximum probability of success • H = Hill’s constant (reflects steepness) • LogDec = log10 decrease at 24 hours • LDm = LogDec giving ½ maximal effect

  8. Non-Linear Regression Po= 0% Pmax= 86% LogDec = log10↓ at 24 hr H=6 LDm=2.4 r2 = 85%, p<0.001

  9. 100 80 60 46 Mortality Rate (%) 40 14 20 0 <2.5 LD >2.5 LD (n=13) (n=21) 30-Day All Cause Mortality • 30-day all cause mortality was higher in patients with MRSA isolates having <2.5 log10 reduction in CFU/mL at 24 hours (p=0.041) • 6/13 (46%) for <2.5 LD • 3/21 (14%) for >2.5 LD P=0.041

  10. MIC Values vs. Outcomes: What MIC is “Susceptible”? p=0.028

  11. Conclusions • In patients with MRSA bacteremia, in vitro activity was significantly related to: time to bacterial eradication, probability of microbiologic success and all-cause mortality. • Persistent bacteremia may occur despite vancomycin treatment, with “normal” plasma drug concentrations, against isolates with a “sensitive” MIC, but which had less than a 2.5 reduction in log10 CFU/mL by 24 hr, in vitro.

  12. Relationship between Time to Eradication in vivo & BactericidalActivity in vitro of Vancomycin for MRSA Infections Pamela A. Moise-Broder, Alan Forrest, Jerome J. Schentag CPL Associates, LLC; UOP; SUNY Buffalo School of Pharmacy

More Related