1 / 8

International Space Station: Investing in Humanity’s Future

USC. U T I L I Z A T I O N • E V O L U T I O N • D E C O M M I S S I O N. International Space Station: Investing in Humanity’s Future. International Exploration Framework William Russell Will.russell@cobham.com ASTE 527 December 15, 2009.

luciano-bolton
Télécharger la présentation

International Space Station: Investing in Humanity’s Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. USC U T I L I Z A T I O N • E V O L U T I O N • D E C O M M I S S I O N International Space Station:Investing in Humanity’s Future International Exploration Framework William Russell Will.russell@cobham.com ASTE 527 December 15, 2009

  2. BackgroundWhat we do well, and what we need to overcome • NASA Strengths • Capacity: Orion will seat 2X as Apollo • Reliability: USA #1 in safe, manned exploration • Infrastructure: ISS Access & many “COTS” suppliers • NASA Weaknesses • Inadequate time/funding: Ares I, Ares V, Altair, etc • Not Top National Priority: Backseat to job creation

  3. Proposed Solution:International Exploration Framework for economic growth • Give ISS partners seats on upcoming NEO/MARS/ MOON mission in return for financing • COTS suppliers meet this demand and grow jobs in U.S. • If necessary, sell mission “privileges” for additional funding • First footsteps on destination surface: $XXB • Mission return off partner’s coastline: $XB ISS would store exploration supplies delivered by COTS flights The first footprints on an exploration mission are probably worth billions in national prestige alone Orion CEV could splashdown near a partners coastline – a huge spectacle

  4. BenefitsHarmonize our approach with our constraints • Creates US Jobs NOW with Foreign Investment • Also further international relations & free-trade • Explore Space Despite Inadequate NASA Resources • Little or no increase in NASA budget required • 3 Americans act as “mission hosts” on each mission • Leverage investment in ISS rendezvous, interfaces, etc • Fully Compatible with Augustine Study • Don’t need to build additional ARES vehicle or Altair • Can leverage existing work on Orion CEV and Ares I • Utilize COTS heavily • Supports ISS beyond 2015

  5. Concept of Operations 4. Int’l Exploration Mission 3. ISS Mission Supply Depot 1. Int’l funded COTS Pre-Supply Missions 5. Int’l Splashdown & Homecoming 2. Int’l CEV Crew

  6. Concept Implications Necessary adaptations to status quo • Political/Organizational • NASA Charter must be adapted to accommodate “global trade” mindset • Technical • ISS must accommodate depot size, mass & power req’ts • Additional truss structure may be required to depot supplies White House is already keen on Int’l partnership ISS initially designed to support a “dual keel” for expansion

  7. ISS PartnersAn expanded customer base for COTS services • United States (GDP: $13.84T) • Japan (GDP: $4.27T) • Russia (GDP: $1.29T) • Canada (GDP: $1.27T) • ESA • Germany (GDP: $2.8T) • France (GDP: $2.6T) • United Kingdom (GDP: $2.13T) • Italy (GDP: $1.8T) • Spain (GDP: $1.36T) • Netherlands (GDP: $827B) • Belgium (GDP: $376.5B) • Sweden (GDP: $338.5B) • Switzerland (GDP: $303.2B) • Norway (GDP: $246.6B) • Denmark (GDP: $203.3B) $12.98T $2.29T

  8. Mission Logistics Fitting the puzzle pieces together • Modest number of Int’l flights can accumulate enough mass at ISS to replace an HLV1 • ESA & Japanese Transfer Vehicles (TV) have enough mass to deliver entire stages • Could explore use of “common design exploration stages” 1: Notional ARES-V claims 71,000Kg to TLI

More Related