1 / 12

Powering for the 2S-Module Random Thoughts

Powering for the 2S-Module Random Thoughts. Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University. CEC Meeting Aachen, 21st of March 2012. 3D-Model with realistic Buck Converter. DC-DC buck converter Components based on smallest v ersion of our pixel converters

luke
Télécharger la présentation

Powering for the 2S-Module Random Thoughts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Powering for the 2S-Module Random Thoughts Katja Klein 1. Physikalisches Institut B RWTH Aachen University CEC Meeting Aachen, 21st of March 2012

  2. 3D-Model with realistic Buck Converter DC-DC buck converter Components based on smallest version of our pixel converters  It fits on the “service hybrid“ Powering the 2S-Module

  3. Buck Converter AC_PIX_V8_E We (Aachen group) develop buck converters based on CERN ASIC for pixel upgrade ASIC Our smallest board: V8 E: 2.6cm x 1.5cm; 1.5 -1.6g ASIC: AMIS4 by CERN Vout = 3.3V or 2.5V fs = 1.5MHz 2-layer PCB Toroidal plastic core inductor L = 450nH Pi-filters at in- and output • Why is a shield required? • to shield the magnetic emissions • as cooling contact for the coil • to segregate “noisy“ parts from output filters Powering the 2S-Module

  4. Buck Converter Remote Control • Two features implemented in AMIS4: • Disable / enable input • Status bit (“power good“) • Need to be controlled from an independently powered unit, otherwise useless. • In phase-1 pixel detector, we plan to use the CCU as controller. • The Slow Control ASIC (SCA) of the GBT could be used for the outer tracker. • Since a “module controller“ is not foreseen, a “rod controller“ would be required. Vin Vin_Return Coil Vout ASIC Vout_Return Disable/enable Status DC-DC buck converter Powering the 2S-Module

  5. Material Budget • Contribution of buck converter, comp. to CMS modules (1 converter per module) “Minimized“: Aluminium coil, no connector, less filter caps • Contribution of buck converter, compared to ATLAS stave (1 converter per hybrid)  Powering circuitry itself might contribute with 5-10% to module material budget 1 normalized to respective module or stave area Novel Powering Schemes

  6. The Conversion Ratio Conversion ratio: • Semi-conductor technology limits input voltage to Vin < 10V • We will need Vout = 1.2V • Maximal achievable conversion ratio is r = 10V / 1.2V = 6.7 • Cables channels can support 15kA • Total power of detector might be 57kW (Stefano Mersi)  48kA at 1.2V • Need r = 4.3 for 75% overall power efficiency • Want r as high as possible to decrease the cable material budget • All our studies (efficiency, noise, …) are currently performed for Vout = 2.5V and 3.3V • Previous measurements with AMIS2 showed efficiency of only 50-60% for Vout = 1.2V • AMIS4 does not provide a (straight-forward) possibility to switch Vout to 1.2V Powering the 2S-Module

  7. Efficiency vs. Conversion Ratio AMIS2 with Vout = 1.2V AMIS2 with Vout = 3.3V AMIS4 with Vout = 3.3V Vin = 6V  r = 1.8 Vin = 8V  r = 2.4 Vin = 10V  r = 3.0 Powering the 2S-Module

  8. Power Requirements • CBC chips: 2 x 8 x 60mA = 1016mA @ 1.2V • Data concentrator: 2 x 170mA = 340mA @ 1.2V • ---------------------------------------------------------------------- • 1.36 A @ 1.2V • Low power GBT: official number is 500mW • But – at what voltages? Try to understand from Sandro Marchioro •  GBT would require 420mA @ 1.2V and 400mA @ 2.5V Standard GBT best guess: GBTX:     1.4W at 1.5VGBSCA:   of the order of 0.3W at 1.5VGBTIA:    0.25W at 2.5 – 3.0VGBLD:     0.75W at 2.5 – 3.0V } 500mW at 1.2V (if 65nm) } this will not change !?  Total current requirement of 1.8A at 1.2V fits to buck converter current capability of 3A Note: bias current has to be provided conventionally Powering the 2S-Module

  9. How to provide 2.5V (and 1.2V) • Need to provide of the order of 400mA at 2.5V • Several options: • Provide 1.2V from buck converter and provide 2.5V conventionally • Provide 1.2V from buck converter and use “1:2 step-up“ switched capacitor converter to derive 2.5V from 1.2V • Only the device from ATLAS is capable of providing 400mA • 1.2V x 2  2.5V • Provide 2.5V from buck converter and use “2:1 step-down“ switched capacitor converter to derive 1.2V from 2.5V • Switched cap. converter would be part of readout chip (+ data concentrator) • Such a device has been developed by CERN • First tests with CBC are promising • Would allow to operate buck converter with relatively low conversion ratio  higher efficiency (e.g. 0.8 x 0.9 = 0.72) Powering the 2S-Module

  10. Switched Capacitor DC-DC Converter • Two chips have been developed: • CERN (step-up and step-down, Iout = 60mA); used by CMS in CMS Binary Chip • From LBNL(step-down, Iout = 500mA); used by ATLAS in FE-I4 • Both with f = 1MHz • Both „divide-by-two“  1 external capacitor (1µF  0402 or 0603) • Both chips do work • Efficiency lower than in simulation but still ~ 90% • Ripple large Phase-1: charge Phase-2: discharge CERN converter Novel Powering Schemes

  11. Switched Capacitor DC-DC Converter • Switched capacitor converter by CERN is part of 130nm CMS Binary Chip • Used to convert 2.5V into 1.25V • Could be combined with buck converter  large r • Works well, with efficiency of ~90% • Spurious charge injected by transients  increase of noise, but only for high input capacitance (will have 2.7pF) • Same chip will be included in next, bump-bonded version of CBC (better coupling between grounds?) 1.78pF 5.79pF Novel Powering Schemes

  12. Open Questions • DC-DC converter related • How to achieve an efficiency of ~ 80% for a large conversion ratio? • Find best combination of buck converter and switched capacitor converter • Reduce material of buck converter • Module related • Where to place DC-DC converter? Stave versus module • How to bring power to the module? Define connectors, cables etc. • How to bring power from converter to hybrids? One U-shaped hybrid vs. separate service hybrid • Implementation of control communication • Cooling of the DC-DC converter • Noise performance – system tests with CBC and module prototypes • Biasing Powering the 2S-Module

More Related