1 / 42

e - cloud simulations (update)

e - cloud simulations (update). C.Octavio Dom ínguez , Giovanni R umolo, Frank Zimmermann. 11 h February 2011 - e - cloud simulations. C ontents. SPS simulations (2003) reproduction Method Partial conclusions 2) LHC simulations N b scan with higher seed pressure

luz
Télécharger la présentation

e - cloud simulations (update)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. e- cloud simulations (update) C.Octavio Domínguez, Giovanni Rumolo, Frank Zimmermann 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  2. Contents • SPS simulations (2003) reproduction • Method • Partial conclusions • 2) LHC simulations • Nb scan with higher seed pressure • Parameter studies at the LHC IR3: State of the art 2 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  3. Contents • SPS simulations (2003) reproduction • Method • Partial conclusions • 2) LHC simulations • Nb scan with higher seed pressure • Parameter studies at the LHC IR3: State of the art 3 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  4. SPS simulations (2003) Goal: to reproduce this plot R? emax? 4 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  5. SPS simulations (2003) No agreement at the beginning (especially for 150 G)  Let’s try whit those plots: Parameters: sz=0.225 m; eNx=(1.66Nb + 1)mm 1 batch, 72 bunches, 25 ns e- cloud monitor P=9 nTorr R=0.3, 0.5, 0.7; emax= 230, 260 No agreement yet 5 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  6. SPS simulations (2003) 6 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  7. SPS simulations (2003) 7 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  8. SPS simulations (2003) 8 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  9. SPS simulations (2003) Neither with 4 batches It seems there were several sensitive changes in the code 9 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  10. SPS simulations (2003) Only 100 G simulations (No multipacting at 150 G!) 10 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  11. SPS simulations (2003) 11 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  12. SPS simulations (2003) • Conclusions • The code has suffered sensitive changes along these years mainly due to the correction (by G.Belodi) of the bug in the model for the angular dependence of dmax • “100% option” seems to agree slightly better with measurements (?) • We cannot simulate yet the measurements accurately enough • BUT: We see the stripes  We can trust our results  not enough seed pressure in the Nb scan study at the LHC arcs? Was the inter-bunch time step too “coarsy”? … 12 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  13. Contents • SPS simulations (2003) reproduction • Method • Partial conclusions • 2) LHC simulations • Nb scan with higher seed pressure • Parameter studies at the LHC IR3: State of the art 13 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  14. LCH arcs - Nb scan From 17/1/2011: P=1 nTorr; nisteps=400 No stripes!!! 14 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  15. LCH arcs - Nb scan • The Nb scan at the LHC arcs was repeated for 4 different cases: • - P=32 nTorr; 90% created e- in the beam volume • - P=320 nTorr; 90% created e- in the beam volume • - P=32 nTorr; 100% created e- in the beam volume • - P=32 nTorr; 100% created e- in the beam volume • For all cases: nbstep=200 and nistep=2500 (not so course; nistep(fine)=7462) • Other parameters used were: dmax=2.6, R=0.5, emax=230 eV 15 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  16. LCH arcs - Nb scan For 100% of the e- generated in the beam volume no stripes at all!!!! 16 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  17. LCH arcs - Nb scan 17 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  18. LCH arcs - Nb scan 18 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  19. LCH arcs - Nb scan The pressure definitely has an impact on the stripes 19 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  20. LCH arcs - Nb scan Nb = 1.5·1011ppb 20 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  21. LCH arcs - Nb scan 21 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  22. LCH arcs - Nb scan Even if we don’t know the exact energy of the e- at which the effects in the walls start to be important, the scrubbing strategy shouldn’t depend on this parameter 22 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  23. LCH arcs - Nb scan • Conclusions • The stripes formation depends radically on the assumed • amount of e- created in the beam volume • Pressure shows also an effect in the position as well as in the • shape of the stripes • The scrubbing strategy should not depend on the energy • threshold for e- impinging the walls 23 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  24. Contents • SPS simulations (2003) reproduction • Method • Partial conclusions • 2) LHC simulations • Nb scan with higher seed pressure • Parameter studies at the LHC IR3: State of the art 24 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  25. LCH IR3 Measurement ECLOUD (from qlosswh.data) 25 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  26. LCH IR3 – Method allaD.Schulte 1 or 2 batches 2 different batch spacings Absolute flux Total # of e- # of with e- E>10eV 26 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  27. LCH IR3 27 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  28. LCH IR3 28 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  29. LCH IR3 29 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  30. LCH IR3 30 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  31. LCH IR3 31 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  32. LCH IR3 32 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  33. LCH IR3 33 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  34. LCH IR3 34 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  35. LCH IR3 35 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  36. LCH IR3 36 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  37. LCH IR3 37 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  38. LCH IR3 38 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  39. LCH IR3 39 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  40. LCH IR3 40 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  41. LCH IR3 41 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

  42. LCH IR3 • Preliminary conclusions (maybe too optimistic?): • 2.1 < dmax < 2.3 • 0.4 < R < 0.7 • Work to do: • Identify better the interesting regions for each batch spacing • Make finer grids • Try to do simulations setting as seed pressure the value from the • measurement for each batch spacing • Cross the fingers and hope that we get a good agreement, . 42 11hFebruary 2011 - e-cloudsimulations

More Related