1 / 10

Presented By John Mettrop Directorate of Airspace Policy Surveillance & Spectrum Management

PSSTG (Public Sector Spectrum Testing Group) VIEW. Presented By John Mettrop Directorate of Airspace Policy Surveillance & Spectrum Management. Introduction. Who Are the PSSTG? Terms of reference Past test programmes Radar protection criteria ITU I/N method Shortcomings

lynna
Télécharger la présentation

Presented By John Mettrop Directorate of Airspace Policy Surveillance & Spectrum Management

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PSSTG (Public Sector Spectrum Testing Group) VIEW Presented By John Mettrop Directorate of Airspace Policy Surveillance & Spectrum Management

  2. Introduction • Who Are the PSSTG? • Terms of reference • Past test programmes • Radar protection criteria • ITU I/N method • Shortcomings • Way forward

  3. Who are the PSSTG? • Formed in 2005 • Established to study interference to Radars from UWB • Permanent members from Ofcom, MOD, MCA & CAA • Additional members by invitation

  4. Terms of Reference • Result of Independent Audit of Spectrum Holdings • Reports to the Bandsharing Group, a sub-group of the UKSSC • Public safety and security spectrum • Development:- • Generic test methodologies • Safety Criteria • Test plans • Undertaking testing and assess the results

  5. Past Test Programmes • Radar vs UWB (Funtington) • December 2005 • March 2006 • Maritime feasibility trials (Shoeburyness) • Maritime radar trials (Oban)

  6. Radar Protection Criteria Shortcomings

  7. Radar Protection Criteria Shortcomings

  8. Radar Protection Criteria Shortcomings • Variance in protection given • Dependent on I/N selected either:- • Does not guarantee safety • Potentially over-restrictive to sharing technology

  9. Way Forward • Establish generic protection criteria • Establish test methodology • Establish a test site if required • Invite proposals for sharing • Promote the issue in CEPT & ITU

  10. Protection of Existing Radar Systems is Paramount

More Related