1 / 14

E-learning, networking and feminist pedagogy as strategies in Finnish Womens Studies

HILMA-University Network /Background. National network of 8 universities, develops co-operation in all levels of teaching, research

lysa
Télécharger la présentation

E-learning, networking and feminist pedagogy as strategies in Finnish Womens Studies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


    1. E-learning, networking and feminist pedagogy as strategies in Finnish Women's Studies Gender & ICT-symposium Manchester , 1.2.2005

    2. HILMA-University Network /Background National network of 8 universities, develops co-operation in all levels of teaching, research & information Areal equality shared resources Profiles of each unit sharpened & appreciated Financed by Ministry of Education 2004-06 Especially e-courses, support to teachers, pedagogical education Networking with other networks (national, european) Portal: www.helsinki.fi/hilma

    3. Virtual Christina (in Helsinki University) Strategy for ICT-development 2004-06: * production of 2-3 new e-courses yearly (evaluation of these) * education for teachers (both technical skills & web-pedagogy) * intranet communication * improving www-information (shared course-materials) * windows outside the academy www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti www.helsinki.fi/minna

    4. E-courses of HILMA open to all WS-students in Finland, started 2001 combination of open& closed environments strengths & profiles of each institute presented part of Finnish Virtual University 10-20 participants, 4-10 ECTS/course students / teachers reactions

    5. Course Examples: The audio-visual technologies of Gender (Koivunen) http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/spavtekno The feminists of 1900s life and work of Kollontai, Goldman& Colette (Rotkirch) http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/feministit Space & Gender (Saarikangas) http://www.helsinki.fi/kristiina-instituutti/verkkokurssi/sptila

    6. Our E-course-concept Developing in teams (3-4): teacher(s) (1-2), technical coordinator, HILMA, Educational center for ICT combination of open www-sites & closed environments Beside the subject students learn how to use net-libraries (FinELib, EBSCOhost etc.) students/teachers learn e-learning (meta-skills)

    7. Why, how, what for? increase interactions (student-teacher / student-student) gives opportunities to teach writing & thinking metaskills of learning, ICT-knowledge for students (useful in labourmarket) image/profile: WS is active in promoting ICTs teachers will reflect their own pedagogical practices

    8. Strategies ICTs have changed the ways of working and teaching in the universities; prefered role in this change: active & innovative more shared expertise, more shared projects, socially decentralized kognition (knowledge belongs to community, not individuals) teaching is more visible e-pedagogy-discussion has increased pedagogical discussion in general using ICTs in universities does not demand teachers being nerds (neither hype) high quality in WS-teaching & research demands also innovative pedagogy

    9. Web-pedagogy (/good pedagogy?) in general learning happens in communication/interaction/discussion cognition is constructed together, in collaborate process (difficult/complex tasks demand over-individual processing) learner is subject in her/his own learning active role possibilities to reflex, analyse own learning process, to return

    10. good web-pedagogy (continued) intentionality - cognitive goals needed (e-courses make planning more transparent) contextuality (situated knowledge, authentic questions) textuality academic work is reading, thinking, writing: e-courses give excellent possibilities to quide/teach all this positive transfer of learning meta-skills achieved

    11. Good Web-teacher? teachers role: cognitive, social & teaching presence facilitating discourse and interaction, giving motivation, feedback, guidance & support helping learners in networking these roles can also be divided when sharing expertise (teaching together?) zone of immediate development (Vygotsky) emotional dimensions of learning/working-environment: good teacher activates this

    12. Feminist pedagogy? Feminism is a dialectic discovery process, researching differences, focusing on gender emansipatory intentions construction on experiences (personal/political) women-friendly practises? safety? emotions? strengthening self-confidence, enhancing self-reflection giving a voice ? (multiple voices)

    13. Connecting these making e-courses good, feminist learning environments giving intellectual gifts teaching/learning as exchange students as younger colleques both teachers and students are participating in a process, which changes conventional ways of working in the academy shared expertise is a strategic choice

    14. Co-operation? first international web-course in 2001 (Knowing feminism - feminist knowing with universities of Stockholm, Tartto, Riga & Vilnius) Nordplus Neighbour-project (Tallinn, Riga, Helsinki) ATHENA-ICT-projects (european web-MA in WS?) other possible joint projects?

    15. Finally feminist pedagogy (/teaching) can be combined with good e-learning putting things to web, using ICTs does not necessarily mean good pedagogical practises content & quality of teaching are in main role WS has a history of critical disciplin being critical combined with being active & innovative can bring good quality of e-learning & e-pedagogy

More Related