1 / 30

EL Education Presentation

EL Education Presentation. Done By: Chan Chin Kiat Chua Song Yang Daryl Lim Lim Yi Fan Wang Qi Yu. Contents. Comparison between Singapore’s education system and the Finnish education system. Comparison between Singapore’s education in the Past and Present.

maine
Télécharger la présentation

EL Education Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EL Education Presentation Done By: Chan Chin Kiat Chua Song Yang Daryl Lim Lim Yi Fan Wang Qi Yu

  2. Contents • Comparison between Singapore’s education system and the Finnish education system. • Comparison between Singapore’s education in the Past and Present.

  3. Education Presentation- Comparison of education systems between Singapore and Finland VS

  4. Why the Finnish education? • Highly different from the education in Singapore • One of the top ranking countries with a good education • OECD’s Education Study • Higher literacy rates in reading, mathematics and the sciences • Narrowest gap between highest and lowest performers

  5. Attributes of Finnish education • Egalitarian system • in which the education favours equality and provides equal opportunities for students • Nordic education system • Emphasises on equality and excellence without tracking or streaming • "We don't divide at an early stage between students who do well and those that don't manage so well in schools," she says, speaking at Finland's education ministry in Helskini.

  6. Attributes of Finnish education • Interactive learning style • In Finland, educators believe that learning is not only linked to rankings etc., however, their education system rather emphasizes a lot on cultivating their students’ interest and passion in learning through interactive teaching and materials. • They believe that having happier attitudes is beneficial to the students’ learning as with an interest in a particular subject, the students will usually do and understand better with an intrinsic motivation to work harder.

  7. Finnish Early Childhood Education • Emphasizes respect for each child’s individuality and the chance for each child to develop as a unique person • Encourage students to more people-oriented and develop interpersonal and intrapersonal skills

  8. 2nd stage of Finnish education • 9-year basic education in comprehensive schools • Randomly allocated or selected, no streaming occurs • Students at 16 can choose to continue their education in the: • Academic track • Vocation track (prepares trainees for manual or practical activities)

  9. Singapore’s education • Hierarchy • Pre-school education • Kindergarten • Primary School (compulsory 6-year education) • PSLE Examinations • Secondary Education (Normal-Academic, IP) • O’Level Examinations • Polytechnics • Junior Colleges

  10. Model structure of education system in Singapore:

  11. Singapore’s education • Meritocratic in nature • Provide more opportunities for students who perform better • Sports • Academics • Arts • Streaming occurs • PSLE examinations • Gifted Education Programme • Selective School system

  12. Similarities • Both countries place large emphasis on education as they are very small with little natural resources • Human resource • Competition in the education sector • Attracts investments

  13. Differences

  14. Why is the Finnish education so successful? • Finnish students only start their education when they are 6, formal schooling at 7 • Students go to school for only half a day • 4 hours a day • 10-week summer break • Singapore students may find themselves spending 6 hours in school, sometimes even longer for CCAs • However, we score still score lower than Finland in the literacy test by PISA

  15. Teachers • Finnish teachers are all prepared in academic universities and need a master’s degree to qualify for a permanent job • can have considerable independence in the classroom to choose their preferred appropriate pedagogical methods; • are very willing to continuously update their professional skills via post-graduate studies; • are more willing to work on themselves, are open to new ideas and developed broader perspectives • Full autonomy to plan curricular

  16. Teachers • In Singapore, teachers undergo a series of test and even training in the NIE • However, most teachers are confined to teaching with conventional methods – textbooks, worksheets

  17. Family involvement • In Finland, 3 books are given to the family of a newborn child • Cultivate a culture of reading from young • Encourage parents to influence their children to read • In Singapore, there could be a lack of family involvement as many parents complain of the long working hours • Lack of family interaction and commitment

  18. Loss of talents • "It's like ice hockey. We let all the girls and boys play, not only the best ones. With this fair play, we can give everyone the same chance to practise their skills - and this also gives us the way to find the best ones." ~ Ms Haatainen, Finnish Minister

  19. Loss of talents • In Finland, talents would not be lost • Education facilitates talent spotting • Students are in the same school for nine years (7 – 16 years old) • Ample time to explore and find their niche areas • In Singapore, streaming happens at the age of 10 for the GEP and PSLE at the age of 12 • Some students may be late developers

  20. Evaluation • The Finland comparison seems the most constructive: • Both Singapore and Finland place tremendous emphasis on their education mechanisms, have comprehensive networks in place, and have achieved equal levels of scholastic excellence. • However, it has been asserted that our Finnish counterparts have been able to attain that level of success with significantly lower stress levels, and where actual processes of teaching-learning take precedence over mutual rankings, results or grades. Therefore, it is vital that Singapore should learn from the successes of the education model in Finland and probably implement its own accordingly to meet the needs of the students, therefore effectively improve the education system.

  21. Education Presentation- Comparison between education of the Past and Present

  22. Past and Present • Education in Singapore is mainly shaped by the changing economical needs in the country • E.g. In the 1960s, there is a need to shift into the manufacturing sector. Implementations such as technical courses were implemented

  23. Characteristics of Past Education – 1960s • Different language medium schools • Late 1960s made bilingualism compulsory, but was not successful • Technical Education

  24. Characteristics of Past Education – 1980s • Streaming at primary level according to linguistic abilities • Weakest stream took Primary School Proficiency Examination (PSPE) instead of PSLE • Religious Knowledge classes (deemed inappropriate as Singapore is a secular state)

  25. Characteristics of Present Education • English-medium schools • No more different language medium schools • Bilingualism • English (1st lang.); Mother tongue (2nd lang.) • Co-curricular activities • LEAPS

  26. Characteristics of Present Education • IP Programme • “Through-Train” – Bypasses GCE ‘O’ Level • Project-based • Independent learners • Filters students and places them in niche schools • i.e. SSS, SST, SOTA, NUS High • Allows room for development of talent • Not necessarily academic-based

  27. Similarities • Both still focus on academics • Streaming still occurs • Though at different levels

  28. Differences

  29. Useful links • http://www.icponline.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=157&Itemid=51 • http://bertmaes.wordpress.com/2010/02/24/why-is-education-in-finland-that-good-10-reform-principles-behind-the-success/ • http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/education/article6754703.ece • http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/dec/07/world-education-rankings-maths-science-reading • http://www.siteselection.com/ssinsider/snapshot/sf011210.htm

  30. Thank You!

More Related