1 / 11

Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2

Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2. Date: 2014-09-15. Authors:. Multiple IEEE presentations have looked at the effects of CCA levels Several presentations have noted that higher CCAs have higher mean and 5% tputs than lower CCAs

maisie-cook
Télécharger la présentation

Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Effect of CCA in residential scenario part 2 Date: 2014-09-15 Authors:

  2. Multiple IEEE presentations have looked at the effects of CCA levels • Several presentationshave noted that higher CCAs have higher mean and 5% tputs than lower CCAs • Note: Baselines of both CCA = -82 and CCA= -92 have been used • At the June IEEE meeting, we presented results for various CCA levels using a reuse 1 residential scneario • document 11-14-0846 • We found that higher CCA levels were often harmful for the 5% point • In this presentation we look at the residential scenario for reuse 3 and 6 Indroduction Qualcomm

  3. Residential Scenario • IEEE residential scenario baseline • Less apartments modelled for faster run times • Expect conclusions will not change • 2x5x3 apartments • 30 APs • 150 STAs (5 STAs per AP) • Pathloss as specified in 11ax Simulation Scenarios document • Reuse-3: 3x80 MHz channel • Reuse-6: 6x40MHz channel • Note: all results are generated by simulating 80MHz BSS and then are appropriately scaled • Results averaged over multiple random drops of APs and STAs locations Simulation Setting I Example of one drop Floor 1 Floor 2 Floor 3 Qualcomm

  4. Simulation Details: • UL only Data traffic (+ DL ACKs) • Full buffer UDP • Default Tx Power: 20 dBm per antenna (AP), 15 dBm ( STA) • Antenna Gain: 0 dBi APs, -2dBi STAs • Rate Control: • MCS per link chosen to maximize long term goodput • MAC modelling • MAC is fully modelled • Deferral according to 11ah CCA rules • OBSS packets deferral only if RSSI > ED (assume BSS ID (color) in PPDU • ED level controls deferral on a network level • Nodes on the same 80 MHz channel have the same primary channel • PHY modelling • Pathloss, shadowing, (pathloss as in SS document, shadowning w sd 5dB) • no fading. • Long term PER curves based on AWGN Simulation Setting II Qualcomm

  5. Channel Coloring: • No two APs that have the same channel share a floor/wall • For each AP, there are no more than 3 other APs that have the same channel and are within 2 (wall/floor)s penetration. • Red Channel • AP = [2,5,8,10,13,16,19,21,24,27] • Blue Channel • AP = [0,3,6,9 ,11,14,17,22,25,28] • Green Channel • AP = [1,4,7,12,15,18,20,23,26,29] Reuse 3(Three channels: Red, Blue and Green) 26 29 25 27 28 20 23 21 22 24 15 18 16 17 19 12 10 11 13 14 7 5 6 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 Qualcomm

  6. 5%ile • 3x improvements vs -92dBm • 4x improvements vs -82dBm • Mean • 30% increase vs -92dBm • No gain compared to -82dBm Reuse 3 results UL 5 STAs per AP Qualcomm

  7. 5%ile • 7x increase vs CCA= -92dBm • 3x increase if baseline is -82dBm • Mean • 76% increase vs CCA= -92dBm • 20%increase vs -82dBm Reuse 3 results cont. UL 1 STAs per AP Note: Results in the table are divided by 5 so they can be compared to the 5 STA per AP case Qualcomm

  8. Channel Coloring: • No two APs that have the same channel are within two floors/walls penetration • Red Channel • AP = [6,9,10,13,27] • Blue Channel • AP = [1,4,17,20,23] • Green Channel • AP = [0,3,16,19,22] • Yellow Channel • AP = [2,15,18,21,24] • Purple Channel • AP = [5,8,12,26,29] • Gray Channel • AP = [7,11,14,25,28] Reuse 6 (Six channels: Red, Blue, Yellow, Purple, Green and Gray) Qualcomm

  9. 5%ile • No gain if baseline is -82 • 4x gain if baseline is -92 • Mean: no difference Reuse 6 results UL 5 STAs per AP 6 40 MHz channels Qualcomm

  10. 5%ile • Significant improvement possible compared to -92dBm baseline • In this scenario, some STAs suffer from the ‘exposed terminal’ issue when -92dBm is used • No gain if baseline is CCA=-82dBm • Mean • 20% gain by going from CCA=-92dBm to anything else • No gain if baseline is CCA -82dBm Reuse 6 results cont. UL 1 STAs per AP Note: Plots are obtained with 80MHz simulations, then result in the table are scaled to emulate 40MHz. Further they are divided by 5 just for easier comparison with the 5STA per AP case 6 40 MHz channels Qualcomm

  11. For residential scenario reuse 1: • Increasing CCA can be harmful for the 5% throughput (from 11-14-0846) • For residential scenario reuse 3: • Gains with increased CCA depend on what is assumed as baseline • 5 STAs • 5%ile: 3x improvements vs -92dBm; 4x improvements vs -82dBm • Mean: 30% increase vs CCA=-92 to CCA= anything higher; No gain compared to -82dBm • 1 STA • 5%: 7x increase vs CCA= -92; 3x increase if baseline is -82 • Mean: 76% increase vs CCA= -92; 20%increase vs -82 dBm • For residential scenario reuse 6 • No gains by increasing CCA (except one special case) • All CCA levels have good reuse • Effects of changing the CCA levels is highly scenario and parameters dependent Conclusions Qualcomm

More Related