1 / 9

What Works for to Reduce Recidivism

What Works for to Reduce Recidivism. Implementing Evidence Based Practices within Johnson County. Overarching Knowledge. Not a single study has found reductions in recidivism using punish-oriented programs. Punishment programs have actually made offenders (youth and adults) worse.

maite-haney
Télécharger la présentation

What Works for to Reduce Recidivism

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. What Works for to Reduce Recidivism Implementing Evidence Based Practices within Johnson County

  2. Overarching Knowledge • Not a single study has found reductions in recidivism using punish-oriented programs. • Punishment programs have actually made offenders (youth and adults) worse. • Majority of studies have shown that correctional treatment interventions have reduced recidivism rates relative to various comparison.

  3. Main Principles of Effective Interventions • Risk Principle • Who we should target for intervention • Moderate to high risk youth • Need Principle • What we should target for intervention • Criminogenic needs • Responsivity Principle • Removing barriers to make youth more successful • Treatment Principle • How we target criminogenic needs • Program Fidelity Principle

  4. Johnson County and the Principles of Effective Classification • Youthful Level of Service Case Management Inventory • Empirically derived risk/needs assessment for juvenile offenders • Designed for use at pre-disposition • Examines 42 items across 8 domains predicting future delinquency • Criminal history • Family • Education • Peers • Substance abuse • Leisure/recreation • Personality • Attitudes

  5. Johnson County and the Principles of Effective Classification • YLS/CMI implemented within Johnson County Corrections January 2007 • Youth placed with Juvenile Justice Authority supervision • YLS/CMI piloted within Johnson County Court Services • Youth who have been adjudicated but not yet sentenced • Assist courts in making sentencing decisions based on risk and need factors • Piloting a Screening Version

  6. Risk Levels for Johnson County

  7. Risk Levels Compared to Other Districts

  8. Need Levels for Johnson County

  9. Addressing Risk Levels Through Evidence Based Practices • Implementing effective programs to address the criminogenic needs • Thinking for a Change • Choices, Changes, Challenges • Aggression Replacement Training • Pathways to Self Discovery and Change • Matching supervision levels to risk levels

More Related