1 / 17

Decoupling and Cross-Compliance as Concepts and Instruments in Agricultural Multifunctionality

Decoupling and Cross-Compliance as Concepts and Instruments in Agricultural Multifunctionality. Kenneth J. Thomson University of Aberdeen. “Agricultural Multifunctionality”.

majed
Télécharger la présentation

Decoupling and Cross-Compliance as Concepts and Instruments in Agricultural Multifunctionality

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Decoupling and Cross-Compliance as Concepts and Instruments in Agricultural Multifunctionality Kenneth J. Thomson University of Aberdeen

  2. “Agricultural Multifunctionality” • The resources of farm businesses and/or households (“farms”) used to produce at least one “commodity” (e.g. wheat, B&B) and one (non-traded) “non-commodity” (e.g. landscape, pollution) • a political football, used to justify protectionism • a policy objective, or a “fact of life”?

  3. Functions and Policy • Functions are the production of commodities and non-commodities • Farms produce via their “activities”, e.g. grazing, off-farm work • Policies affect (encourage, discourage, alter) many of these activities, directly and indirectly, and thus affect functions

  4. A Policy-Function Matrix for Multifunctionality • Columns = Policy Areas (or “Policies”), e.g. market support, agri-environmental measures, energy policy • Rows = Functions, e.g. food production, landscape provision, social cohesion • Cell entries = how farm Activities are affected by Policies in terms of the Function(s) they provide

  5. Matrix Completions (see hand-out) • Expert entries for 11 Case Study Areas (mostly NUTS3) in TOP-MARD Partner Countries • Most entries for CAP-type measures (market support, direct income aids, agric. devt. support), agri-environmental measures, and LEADER-type projects

  6. Main Policy (column) Entries • All “agricultural” policies affect almost all “functions“; but sometimes negative or ambiguous • Biodiversity and other environmental policies positive for water, wildlife, etc. • Regional Fund and (especially) LEADER generally positive for several agric. functions • Energy policy positive for farm production (unprocessed and processed) • Forestry policy affects farm production also landscape and wildlife (negatively?)

  7. Main Function (row) Entries • Farm product supply affected (positively) by several policies, not all “ agricultural”. • Food security, food quality (actual or perceived) and animal welfare generally improved by several policies • Tourist facilities promoted by both agricultural development policies and LEADER-type schemes. • Landscape and natural resources affected, both positively and negatively, by most policies • “Soft” functions promoted by several policies, but other policies have uncertain or negative effects.

  8. Policy Scenarios • Time horizon? – 2013, but simulate to 2030? • Policies only, or market/other developments? – mostly policy only • One-by-one, or joint? – joint • “Plausible” or “extreme”? - “plausible” • Number of scenarios? – less than 10?

  9. Decoupling and Cross-Compliance • Decoupling a “hot” modelling topic • theory (SFP/SAPS as lump sum or coupled) • country-to-country variation (and change) • Cross-compliance less analysed? In UK: • Statutory Management Requirements (SMRs) from 18 EU Directives/Regs. • Good agricultural and environmental condition(GAEC) standards, e.g. land management, other (UK) legal reqts.

  10. More on Cross-Compliance • So far, fairly limited; “easy” standards, uncertain policing and penalties • In the 10 SAPS NMSs: • limited to permanent pasture • (even) more “agricultural” than in EU-15 • difficult to deal with land abandonment • An “excuse” for SFPs/SAPSs? But …

  11. Future of Cross-Compliance? • Depends on pace of decoupling • Strengthen into a full-scale agri-environmental measure?

  12. A New Scheme in Scotland • Tiers 0 (basic), 1 (SFP), 2 (AE), 3 (special) • Tier 1: 18 GAEC standards (94pp guide!); • Tier 2 Land Management Contracts (LMCs) to comprise most pre-existing schemes via: • 20-item menu of options • Individual contracts, mostly five-year • Fixed payment rates, e.g. ~€100-300/yr for AHW, €1.50/ha moor, €150/visit, €4/m path • Overall max.: e.g. €4500/100ha or €450(+)/ha

  13. Conclusions • Multifunctionality: what mix of “functions”? What kinds of farm (household) activities? • TOP-MARD policy-function matrix a useful tool? – but need to refine in use • Decoupling (SFP/SAPS) creates need for cross-compliance, but: • future strengthening (rules and/or control)? • develop into full-scale AE and other schemes?

  14. Thank you !

  15. Contents • Introduction • Agricultural Multifunctionality • Functions and Policy • Policy Matrix • Main Functions of Agriculture across Europe • Policy Scenarios • Decoupling and Cross Compliance • Conclusions

More Related