1 / 5

Q 3 Revisited

Q 3 Revisited. Why did the two different methods produce different results?. The question was inconsistent!. Initial momentum was 0.117 kgms -1. One of the momentum vectors was at an angle of 50 degrees. The other vector was at 90 degrees to that one.

manchu
Télécharger la présentation

Q 3 Revisited

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Q 3 Revisited Why did the two different methods produce different results?

  2. The question was inconsistent! Initial momentum was 0.117 kgms-1 One of the momentum vectors was at an angle of 50 degrees. The other vector was at 90 degrees to that one. Now the triangle is fixed! All quantities can be calculated. There is no freedom to make up results.

  3. Calculate what the velocities should have been. Initial momentum was 0.117 kgms-1 40 degrees 50 degrees. 90 degrees The masses have a mass of 0.065 kg.

  4. Trigonometry. Initial momentum was 0.117 kgms-1 50 degrees. 40 degrees p2 p1 90 degrees Cos 40 = p1 / 0.117 p1 = 0.117 x cos 40 = 0.0896 kgms-1 Sin 40 = p2 / 0.117 p2 = 0.117 x sin 40 = 0.0752 kgms-1 Pythagoras : sqrt of (0.07522 + 0.08962) = 0.11697 – Agrees!!

  5. Velocities p2 = 0.0752 kgms-1 = 0.065kg x V2 V2 = p2 / 0.065 = 1.156 ms-1 =1.2 ms-1 (2 s.f) p1 = 0.0896 kgms-1 = 0.065kg x V1 V1 = p1 / 0.065 = 1.378 ms-1 =1.4 ms-1 (2 s.f)

More Related