1 / 15

Evaluation of the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) projects

Evaluation of the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) projects. General Practice Victoria Mental Health Network Meeting 27 March 2009 Kylie King, Bridget Bassilios , Justine Fletcher, Jane Pirkis , Fay Kohn Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics

marc
Télécharger la présentation

Evaluation of the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) projects

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evaluation of the Access to Allied Psychological Services (ATAPS) projects General Practice Victoria Mental Health Network Meeting 27 March 2009 Kylie King, Bridget Bassilios, Justine Fletcher, Jane Pirkis, Fay Kohn Centre for Health Policy, Programs and Economics The University of Melbourne

  2. Presentation Outline • Overview ATAPS Evaluation Findings • Minimum Data Set • T-CBT • Suicide Prevention • Perinatal Depression • Discussion / Questions

  3. Urban & rural referrals over timeN=135,994Data downloaded January 2009

  4. Consumer outcomes • Multiple outcome measures used across projects • Pre- and post- outcome scores available for 11,823 (15%) consumers from 54 (50%) projects • cf 5,288 consumers (7%) from 42 projects (38%) May 2007 • Overall large positive effect size • (80% projects show positive effects - 43% of projects showed large positive effects, 22% showed medium positive effects, 13% showed small positive effects) Data downloaded January 2008

  5. Outcome Data: VIC DivisionsData Downloaded January 2008 • 12 of 29 VIC divisions entering useable data • 3.9% (1,320/33,880) VIC consumers with pre- and post-test data • Represents 11% (1,320/ 11,876) of consumers nationally in outcome data

  6. Minimum Data Set (MDS) • Web-based data entry system • Purpose is to obtain consistent and informative data from all ATAPS projects Data Collected • Patient demographics • Referral information • Session information • Pre & post outcome data

  7. Accessing the MDS • Username and password • Username and password can be used by more than one staff member (at your Division) to view the minimum dataset at the same time • only one person can make changes to the data at a time • GPs and AHPs can use the username and password provided to the Division and enter the data themselves. • The Minimum Dataset is accessed on the web at the following address: http://boimhc.org/bin/view. • Frequently Asked Questions link at the bottom of the home page • Questions regarding the minimum dataset support@boimhc.org

  8. How Divisions can use the MDS: Data Entry • Methods of data entry • Direct entry to MDS • Upload data sets from Excel /Access etc • Enter data as soon as it is available • At the very least once per fortnight • Complete data, by entering zero instead of leaving fields blank

  9. Changes to MDS

  10. Changes to MDS

  11. How Divisions can use the MDS: Reporting • Each division can view only their own data • Automatically generate a series of Individual Division Reports. • Compare with National Data • Compare with de-identified, aggregated ‘peer’ divisions • Enables Divisions to generate a series of tables for the MDS fields, including both consumer and session data. • These reports present data on consumers referred, and sessions provided, in a given period.

  12. Data entry tips • Each consumer should retain the same ‘patient key’ for all referrals • A new referral number is allocated after 12 sessions • When entering DASS scores enter either total or subscale scores. NOT BOTH • When entering HADS scores use HADS-ANX or HADS-DEP not HADS • If one lump sum copayment is taken for numerous sessions it should be divided by the number of sessions, and each session entered with the corresponding amount. • EG $120 in one payment for six sessions. The MDS should reflect that each sessions copayment was $20

  13. Interim Evaluation Reports& Evaluation Support Reports available at: http://boimhc.org • Jane Pirkis • Bridget Bassilios • Justine Fletcher • Fay Kohn • Kylie King • Grant Blashki • Philip Burgess • LucioNaccarella • Belinda Morley Evaluation support available via email: support@boimhc.org

More Related