1 / 38

Handoffs & Signouts

Handoffs & Signouts. Ryutaro Hirose, MD Associate Program Director Surgical Residency University of California, San Francisco. UCSF Handoff Task force. Arpana Vidyarthi Susan Promes Glenn Rosenbluth Brad Sharpe John Young Jonathan Carter Bobby Baron. Handoff - definitions.

marci
Télécharger la présentation

Handoffs & Signouts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Handoffs & Signouts Ryutaro Hirose, MD Associate Program Director Surgical Residency University of California, San Francisco

  2. UCSF Handoff Task force • Arpana Vidyarthi • Susan Promes • Glenn Rosenbluth • Brad Sharpe • John Young • Jonathan Carter • Bobby Baron

  3. Handoff - definitions • A gap in care = Handoff • Caregiver 1 Caregiver 2 • Transfer of care • Represents patient vulnerability • SIGNOUT = information transfer to close gap in care • a source of potential error • miscommunication • can contribute to suboptimal care HANDOFF SIGNOUT

  4. Handoffs • We in surgery have resisted handoffs • Continuity of care • Professionalism • Work ethic • anti-'shift mentality' • relationship between surgeon and patient • As a direct result of the changing environment, regulations, restrictions regarding duty hours, HANDOFFS ARE HERE TO STAY.

  5. Needs • Understanding of the new medical landscape regarding handoffs • Understand the scope of discontinuity in inpatient care • Identify continuity of care (lack thereof) as a safety and malpractice vulnerability • To promote the quality of care through improvements in communication to counteract the challenges of discontinuity of care

  6. ACGME Duty hours regulations (7/1/11) • VI.G.4.a) Duty periods of PGY-1 residents must not exceed 16 hours in • duration. • VI.G.4.b) Duty periods of PGY-2 residents and above may be scheduled to • a maximum of 24 hours of continuous duty in the hospital. • VI.G.4.b).(1) It is essential for patient safety and resident education that effective transitions in care occur. Residents may be allowed to remain on-site in order to accomplish these tasks; however, this period of time must be no longer than an additional four hours. • VI.G.4.b).(2) Residents must not be assigned additional clinical responsibilities after 24 hours of continuous in-house duty. • VI.G.4.b).(3) In unusual circumstances, residents, on their own initiative, may remain beyond their scheduled period of duty to continue to provide care to a single patient. Justifications for such extensions of duty are limited to reasons of required continuity for a severely ill or unstable patient, academic importance of the events transpiring, or humanistic attention to the needs of a patient or family.

  7. ACGME Common Program Requirements (effective 7/1/2011) • VI.B. Transitions of Care • VI.B.1. Programs must design clinical assignments to minimize the number of transitions in patient care. • VI.B.2. Sponsoring institutions and programs must ensure and monitor effective, structured hand-over processes to facilitate both continuity of care and patient safety. • VI.B.3. Programs must ensure that residents are competent in communicating with team members in the hand-over process.

  8. Duty hours regulations • To fight fatigue • To reduce errors • with new ACGME regulations, by necessity, there will be more handoffs, more discontinuity • at UCSF – one day = 4000 handoffs (1.5 million handoffs/year)

  9. Definition - Signout • The transfer of information, professional responsibility and accountability between individuals and teams • Joint Commission: " A contemporaneous, interactive process of passing patient information from one caregiver to another for the purpose of ensuring the continuity and safety of patient care"

  10. Root cause of sentinel events - JC • Root Cause Information for Op/Post-op Complication Events Reviewed by The Joint Commission (Resulting in death or permanent loss of function) 2004 through Second Quarter 2011 (N=563) • The majority of events have multiple root causes • Human Factors 334 • Communication 315 • Assessment 295 • Leadership 240 • Information Management 121 • Operative Care 91 • Physical Environment 69 • Care Planning 67 • Medication Use 56 • Continuum of Care 47

  11. The Joint Commission • JC data show that communication is identified in 65%-75% of root cause analyses • In 2006 National Patient Safety Goals • 'Implement a standardized approach to "hand off" communications, including an opportunity to ask and respond to questions'

  12. Other calls to improve handoffs • World Health Organization, 2006 • prevention of handover errors part of "high fives" patient solutions • Institute of Medicine, 2008 re: Residency duty hours • Teaching programs "should train residents in how to hand over their patients using effective communications"

  13. Medico-legal implications • Handoffs are a major contributing factor in trainee related malpractice cases and more frequently affect trainee cases than attending only cases • Missed and delayed diagnoses – studies of closed malpractice claims • COMMUNICATION FAILURES • ambulatory: 20% • ED: 24% • Trainees across specialties 70% linked to teamwork issues – the most prevalent type was HANDOFF failures

  14. Root cause of errors-discontinuity of care • Studied factors associated with hospital based medical preventable adverse event • Most significant risk factor for preventable adverse events: presence of a CROSS COVERING MD • Odds ratio: 6.2 • Petersen Ann Intern Med 1994

  15. Residents perception • Residents believe handoffs are dangerous • Handoffs result in suboptimal care practice • 59% report patient harm • increased errors from discontinuity

  16. Is it the gap or is it the signout? • First year residents interviewed • Communication failures N=25 • Content omissions N=22 • failure to report an active medical problem • failure to report medication/other Rx • Failure to report pending/ordered dx tests or consult • Failure-prone communication processes N=8 • no face-to-face communication • interruptions • illegible/unclear notes • Led to uncertainty in clinical decisions AroraQualSaf Health Care 2005

  17. Other analyses • Emergency medicine • Handoff is the gray zone • Errors due to communcation failures • Incomplete information • high workload • pending data • ambiguity • Surgery • Information transfer lapses • Blurred boundaries of responsibility • decreased familiarity of patients • diversion of attention • distorted or inhibited communication

  18. Errors due to discontinuity • Delayed test ordering • Increased in-hospital complciations • increased medication errors • Presumed increase in LOS • Errors in communication result in preventable deaths

  19. Hospitalists/faculty • Hospitalists report various categories of 'missed information' during service change (71%) • hospital course • future plans • disagreements over management • Adverse and near miss events arising from missed information (57%)

  20. Structure: Non-Medical Handoffs • Aviation • NASA, Nuclear Plants, EMS, Railroad dispatch • F1 Racing

  21. Strategies for effective handoff from other industries • Direct observations of handoffs at NASA, 2 Canadian nuclear power plants, a railroad dispatch center, and an ambulance dispatch center • Strategies include: • STANDARDIZE – use same order or template • Update information • Limit interruptions • Face to face verbal update • with interactive questioning • Structure includes • Read-back to ensure accuracy

  22. Signoffs are a form of communication • Effective channels vs. ineffective channels

  23. Efficacy of communication channels

  24. Structure - Medical Mnemonics • AIDET, ANTIcipate, ASHICE, CUBAN, DeMIST, GRRRR, HANDOFFS, I PASS the BATON, Just Go NUTS, MIST, PACE, PEDIATRIC, SBAR, I-SBAR, SBARR, SBAR-T, SHARED, SHARQ, SIGNOUT, SOAP, STICC, 4P's, 5P's V.1, 5P's V.2 • SBAR: Situation-Background-Assessment-Recommendation • Most frequently cited (70%) • reported by anesthesiologists, ED staff, midlevels, nurses, OR staff, PACU staff, periop staff, pharmacists, physical therapists, physicians, transporters, radiologists

  25. Structure – SIGNOUT? • Sick or DNR • Identifying data • General hospital course • New events (of the day/12-24 hours) • update the clinical data • Overall health status/clinical conditions/comorbidities • Upcoming possibilities/ possible problems/contingency plans/rationale • Tasks – Pending tests, anticipate results, Plan/Rationale • ?'s

  26. SIGNOUT? • Sick/DNR – Focus on sick patients. Management plan, contingency plan, threshold for higher level of care. Residents should see the sick patients BEFORE they are called • Identifying Data – who the patient is, where they are located, age • General Hospital Course – Surgery date/type, post-op complications, Abx, Diet, Meds, general pathway • New events of the day – emphasize major events, those patients that went off trajectory

  27. SIGNOUT? (continued) • Overall health status/clinical condition – Important comorbidities, medications, etc • Upcoming possibilities/plan rationale – Anticipate problems • Tasks/rationale/plan – Outstanding information to be gathered, outstanding labs/studies/consults. Who needs to be informed. • ?'s – Needs to be an active process, receiver understands, readback,

  28. Elements of an effective signout • Face – to – face • Needs Structure/Template • Ensure enough time • Limit interruptions • Interactive process, communication, questions • Use a process of verification • Use a written tool – computerized, EMR • Up to date and accurate and succinct information • use as an opportunity to review important and relevant historical data • (It is a teaching/learning moment)

  29. Psychology of miscommunication • Overestimation of understanding • Senders systematically overestimate how well their messages are understood by listeners • Egocentric heuristic • Senders assume that receiver has the same knowledge as they do • These worsens with the personal familiarity of the receiver

  30. Does this occur in medical handoffs ? – U of C Pediatric • Ask senders to guess what receivers would say was THE MOST important piece of information for each patient • The most important piece of information was NOT communicated 60% of the time • Did not agree on the rationales provided for 60% of the items • at times completely contradictory

  31. Receiver – what did the sender say? • Read-back/repeat back on all to-do items • If- then statements • Read back – reduces errors in communication • Examples in industry • Examples in medical environment: Lab reporting

  32. Senders – think about the Reveiver (4R's) • Relevant items that will be Remembered • Focus on sickest patients first • Daily progress (today's baseline, updated events) • To Do items, IF/Then • Directions with Rationale • avoid ambiguity. Don't say 'check CBC' • check for Receiver Understanding • Encourage questions and Read-back • Overcome egocentric heuristic – put yourself in the shoes of the receiver • the handoff is a TEACHING opportunity

  33. Receivers • Actively listen • stay focused, limit interruptions, take notes • Ask questions • to ensure you understand tasks and rationale • the handoff is a learning opportunity • Use a system • to keep prioritize, track of to do items that require action • Read-back • information, tasks, rationale to ensure you are both on the same page

  34. EMR pitfalls - CoPaGA syndrome • Copy and Paste Gone Amok • Repeated selecting, copying and pasting text from past EMR notes into current notes, the physician-victim accomplishes the following: • avoids time-consuming work of actually talking to the patient • builds a documentation trail that portrays thorough, CMS compliant, level V billing faux work • crowds out useful information by a glut of useless, irrelevant, outdated data • zombie-like propagation and dissemination of inaccuracies, chart lore, myth, (mutations) that self-replicate and persist • CORRECT INACCURACIES in the EMR!

  35. Written sign out tool pitfalls: TMI • the sign out tool becomes a unnecessarily long shadow chart • becomes a personal tracker of information • Used to keep track of everything – obscures what is going on right now • Loses its primary function for the receiver

  36. Handoff Best Practices • A Written and Verbal component • There is a checklist for both • Think about • WHO: who is the sender and who is the receiver • level of experience • WHAT: • for how long • a few hours • for a weekend • for good? • HOW: • too often a one way street. NOT EFFECTIVE • has to be a dialogue. without questions, this is inadequate

  37. the future… • Education • Technology • EMR • APEX • increase continuity? • monitoring? • culture change regarding handoffs

  38. Summary • Discontinuity is harmful • Handoffs are complex • Signoffs can ameliorate or exacerbate effects of handoffs • Structure – Template - EMR • Improve process – make it an active process • Help our patients!

More Related