1 / 4

KCS’ Single Window History

KCS’ Single Window History. 1. Building the Single Window System. P eriod : AUG ‘04 ~ MAR ‘06 Scale : 2,600 Mil. KRW (2.6 million USD) Connection with 8 agencies such as KFDA and NVRQS. 1 st phase Basic System. Extending the Single Window System. 2. Single Window. 2 nd phase

marge
Télécharger la présentation

KCS’ Single Window History

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. KCS’ Single Window History 1 Building the Single Window System • Period: AUG ‘04~ MAR ‘06 • Scale: 2,600 Mil. KRW (2.6 million USD) • Connection with8 agencies such as KFDA and NVRQS 1st phase BasicSystem Extending the Single Window System 2 Single Window 2nd phase Extended System • Period: MAR ‘06~ FEB ‘07 • Scale: 1,400 Mil. KRW (1.4 million USD) • Connection with 12 agencies (adding 4 more agencies including KTR) 3rd phase Advanced System Improve the Single Window system 3 • Period: JAN‘08~ JUL ‘08 • Scale: 1,700Mil. KRW (1.7 million USD) • Improving function and servicefor user convenience • Connection with 15 agencies (adding 3 more agencies such as FITI testing and research institute)

  2. Data Harmonization

  3. Standardized Document Design DOCUMENT Making Form ITEM STRUCTURE 1. Export Declr.-> EX1 2. Import Declr.-> IM1 3. Export Manifest-> CRE 4. Import Manifest -> CRI 5. Entry&Departure-> CONV 6. Bonded Trans.-> TRT

  4. Lessons Learned Success Factors Failure Factors • Lack of best practices • Compete with other government authorities • Data ownership • Inconsistent government policy • Data standardization • Inconvenient services at the early stage • Not mandatory • Strong political support • Completion of e-Customs Project • Sufficient allocation of government budget • Active support from private sectors • Free of charge (internet-based system) • Customer-oriented services • Low maintenance expenses • Phased implementation

More Related