1 / 18

Trapped radiation models

Trapped radiation models. D. Heynderickx Belgisch Instituut voor Ruimte-Aëronomie Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel D.Heynderickx@oma.be. Earth’s Van Allen belts. Galactic cosmic rays. Solar energetic particles. Secondary (albedo) radiat i on. Radiation belts. Charged particle trapping.

mark-randall
Télécharger la présentation

Trapped radiation models

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Trapped radiation models D. Heynderickx Belgisch Instituut voor Ruimte-Aëronomie Ringlaan 3, B-1180 Brussel D.Heynderickx@oma.be

  2. Earth’s Van Allen belts Galactic cosmic rays Solar energetic particles Secondary (albedo) radiation Radiation belts

  3. Charged particle trapping • Particle motion: gyration, bounce, drift • Guiding centre approximation: McIlwain’s (B,L) coordinates • Model description: J(E,B,L)

  4. Trapped proton population

  5. Trapped electron population

  6. The South Atlantic Anomaly • Low altitude part of radiation belts • Tilt and shift of geomagnetic field: Fraser-Smith, Rev. Geophys., 25, 1, 1987 • Interaction with neutral atmosphere http://www.spenvis.oma.be/spenvis/help/background/magfield/cd.html

  7. The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA)

  8. Trapped proton variability • Seasonal • Secular variation of geomagnetic field • Impulsive • Solar cycle

  9. Secular variation AP-8 MIN SAMPEX/PET Directional proton flux >18 MeV at 500 km

  10. Impulsive penetration

  11. CRRESELE Equatorial L profiles Parametrized in terms of Ap15: 15 day average of Ap

  12. Available models • De facto standard models: NASA AP-8 and AE-8 • Advantages of the NASA models: • Widespread usage (heritage) • Full spatial coverage and energy range • Disadvantages of the NASA models: • Represent radiation environment of the 60’s and 70’s • Static models (but probably ok for long time averages) • Contamination by Starfish electrons • Other models: • CRRESPRO, CRRESELE • NOAAPRO • POLE • SAMPEX/PET

  13. Replacement of AP-8 and AE-8 • New models do not have sufficient spatial and/or temporal coverage and/or energy range • Incomplete energy range can lead to misleading effects estimations

  14. Standardisation efforts • COSPAR Panel for Radiation Belt Environment Modeling (PRBEM) http://wwwe.onecert.fr/craterre/prbem/ • NASA working group meeting: • Focus efforts on selected regions of space and energy ranges to expedite AP-8 and AE-8 replacement • POLE model for GEO • SAMPEX/PET+NOAAPRO for LEO protons • ONERA/LANL GPS modelling for MEO • RERMM study: use data from different satellites + Salammbô numerical simulation to produce ‘ad hoc’ models

More Related