1 / 3

Forcefield – MAW space for actions

Forcefield – MAW space for actions. R4 Differences between some parts / desire for autonomy. R2 Over-complexity / lack of flexiibility of model / system. Restraining forces. R5 Resources reqd implement esp people. R3 Lack of senior mg buy in. R1 Multiple regulation muddying.

marlow
Télécharger la présentation

Forcefield – MAW space for actions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forcefield – MAW space for actions R4 Differences between some parts / desire for autonomy R2 Over-complexity / lack of flexiibility of model / system Restraining forces R5 Resources reqd implement esp people R3 Lack of senior mg buy in R1 Multiple regulation muddying A10 Training and development A4 Analyse together A7Evidence and discussion – where are we; why bother; effective consultation A2Staff survey A6 Remove, reappoint blockers A9 Briefing implementers reinforcing core objecivess A13 Manage model from simple to complex Actions A11 Use to inform decisions eg new courses A3 Championing / cultural change group A12 Create a universalising rationale A1 Elucidate connection Uni strat A8 Risk analysis re regs etc A5 Link MAW appraisal, strat dev etc D3 Transparency fairness equity D5 Justify resource allocations / efficiency gains D4 Promotion and appraisal D2 Improving employee rels D1 External factors H+S etc Driving forces

  2. R4 Differences between some parts / desire for autonomy R2 Over-complexity / lack of flexiibility of model / system Restraining forces R5 Resources reqd implement esp people R3 Lack of senior mg buy in R1 Multiple regulation muddying A10 Training and development A4 Analyse together A7Evidence and discussion – where are we; why bother; effective consultation A2Staff survey A6 Remove, reappoint blockers A9 Briefing implementers reinforcing core objecivess A13 Manage model from simple to complex Actions A11 Use to inform decisions eg new courses A3 Championing / cultural change group A12 Create a universalising rationale A1 Elucidate connection Uni strat A8 Risk analysis re regs etc A5 Link MAW appraisal, strat dev etc D3 Transparency fairness equity D5 Justify resource allocations / efficiency gains D4 Promotion and appraisal D2 Improving employee rels D1 External factors H+S etc Driving forces Forcefield – MAW space for actions

  3. Forcefield Actions Summary • Inclusive consultation (A2, A4, A7) • Clarity through briefing on core objectives (A9, A12) • Simplicity of operation (A10, A13) • Tool to inform resource planning (A6, A11) • Link to university strategy and other university processes (A1, A3, A5, A8)

More Related