PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3x3 Committee Meeting November 28, 2006

1. PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS 3x3 Committee Meeting November 28, 2006

2. Outline • Progress Report • New vs Renovation Analysis (Format/Process) • Goals • Q&A.

3. Preliminary schedule New vs renovation analysis

4. Preliminary schedule New vs renovation analysis

5. Preliminary schedule New vs renovation analysis MDOE New Construction vs. Renovation Format Part I: Educational Adequacy Part II: History of Building Part III: Site Analysis Part IV: Expandability Part V: Facility Analysis Part VI: Comparative Cost Analysis Part VII: Summary

6. Cefpi Appraisal New vs renovation analysis

7. 12 15 18 8 8 2 3 12 8 6 12 104 Cefpi Appraisal New vs renovation analysis

8. 440sf Concept design – john bapst hs example New vs renovation analysis Concept plan existing plan

9. Lyseth Moore MS Arts and Technology HS Riverton Presumpscot East End Baxter Lincoln MS Adams Longfellow Hall Deering HS Portland HS Clifford King MS West Reiche

10. goals New vs renovation analysis • The primary assumptions are: • Fiscal Capacity • Enrollment Trends • Community Needs • Educational Mandates • Economic Diversity • Other assumptions include: • Maintaining the recommendations of the 1997 EFTF Plan • Reduce the current number of facilities • Consolidate students wherever possible • Limit redistricting • Maintain neighborhood integrity • Include all facilities • Timeline • Limit school size • Provide adequate program sites

11. goals New vs renovation analysis • Goals: • Reduce costs • Respond to current and  future enrollment trends and possibilities • Improve the retention rate of students who live in the City • Provide schools that meet community needs • Align facilities with educational plan • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools. • Limit the impact redistricting of students   • Maintain neighborhood integrity • Minimize disruption of successful learning communities (new)

12. goals New vs renovation analysis • Nick Mavodones • Align facilities with educational plan • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools • Respond to current and future enrollment trends and possibilities • Provide schools that meet community needs • James Cloutier • Align facilities with educational plan • Respond to current and future enrollment trends and possibilities • Provide schools that meet community needs • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools • Susan Hopkins • Align facilities with educational plan • Provide schools that meet community needs • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools • Maintain neighborhood integrity • Ellen Alcorn • Align facilities with educational plan • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools • Provide schools that meet community needs • Respond to current and future enrollment trends and possibilities • Edward Suslovic • Align facilities with educational plan • Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools • Minimize disruption of successful learning communities (new) • Respond to current and future enrollment trends and possibilities • Ben Meiklejohn • Provide schools that meet community needs • Limit the impact redistricting of students • Reduce costs • Respond to current and future enrollment trends and possibilities

13. goals New vs renovation analysis • Goals: • 1 - Align facilities with educational plan (1,1,1,1,1) • 2 - Consider economic diversity and equity in building and renovating schools. (2,4,3,2,2) • 3 - Provide schools that meet community needs (4,3,2,3,1) • 4 - Respond to current and  future enrollment trends and possibilities (3,2,4,4,4) • 5 - Limit the impact redistricting of students (2)   • 6 (tie) - Reduce costs (3) • 6 (tie) - Minimize disruption of successful learning communities (new) (3) • 7 - Maintain neighborhood integrity (4)

14. goals New vs renovation analysis • The 3x3 charge from the City Council is to: • Review the Elementary Facilities Task Force report dated November 2002 and the subsequent EFTF2 report issued March 2006 • Review and analyze existing data regarding enrollment trends, facilities conditions, fiscal capacity and educational mandates • Gather any additional data it deems necessary • Recommend which elementary school facilities should be considered “anchor” schools to be maintained into the foreseeable future, including any findings necessary to allow the City to make necessary improvements or modifications to such schools pending more comprehensive renovation or reconstruction; • Recommend an updated plan for phasing the consolidation and renovation of elementary school facilities, including timeline and funding sources • Work with and advise any architects or consultants retained to evaluate the feasibility of alternatives related to the Nathan Clifford School • Hold public meetings to inform and solicit feedback from parents and the general public • Submit recommendations to the School Committee and City Council by January 15, 2007