1 / 8

Path Computation Element WG Status

Path Computation Element WG Status. Jean-Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com) Julien Meuric (julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com). Note Well.

marv
Télécharger la présentation

Path Computation Element WG Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Path Computation ElementWG Status Jean-Philippe Vasseur (jvasseur@cisco.com) Julien Meuric (julien.meuric@orange-ftgroup.com)

  2. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made within the context of an IETF activity is considered an "IETF Contribution". Such statements include oral statements in IETF sessions, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to: * The IETF plenary session * The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG * Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices * Any IETF working group or portion thereof * The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB * The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function All IETF Contributions are subject to the rules of RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 (updated by RFC 4879). Statements made outside of an IETF session, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not IETF Contributions in the context of this notice. Please consult RFC 5378 and RFC 3979 for details. A participant in any IETF activity is deemed to accept all IETF rules of process, as documented in Best Current Practices RFCs and IESG Statements. A participant in any IETF activity acknowledges that written, audio and video records of meetings may be made and may be available to the public.

  3. Administrivia • Apologies for being unable to attend • from JP, co-chair • Blue sheets; scribes (thanks Martin) • Presenters • stick to your timeslot • focus on solving issues (otherwise use the list!) • People at the mic: please state your name • people above might try to follow remotely

  4. Agenda Bashing 1. Introduction 1.1. Administrivia, Agenda Bashing (chairs, 5 min) 1.2. WG Status (chairs, 10 min) 2. GMPLS and Optical Networks 2.1. PCEP Extensions for GMPLS (Cyril Margaria, 5 min) 2.2. PCEP Requirement for RWA (Oscar Gonzalez de Dios, 5 min) 2.3. PCEP Extensions for RWA (Cyril Margaria, 10 min) 2.4. PCEP Extensions for Flexi-Grid Optical Networks (Yongli Zhao, 5 min) 3. Multi-Domain 3.1. Procedure to Compute P2MP Inter-Domain TE-LSPs (Daniel King, 5 min) 3.2. Hierarchical PCE Framework (Daniel King, 10 min) 3.3. PCEP Extensions for Hierarchical PCE (Oscar Gonzalez de Dios, 10 min) 3.4. Representation of Domain Sequence (Dhruv Dhody, 10 min) 3.5. Forward-Search Path Computation (Huaimo Chen, 5 min) [80/120] 4. Stateful PCE 4.1. PCEP Extensions for State Delegation (Edward Crabbe, 15 min) 4.2. PCEP Notification for States Synchronization (Kexin Tang, 5 min) 5. MPLS Applications 5.1. PCEP Extensions for Associated Bidirectional LSPs (Wenjuan He, 10 min) 5.2. PCEP Extensions for Service-Aware LSPs (Dhruv Dhody, 5 min) 5.3. PCEP Extensions for Backup End Nodes (Huaimo Chen, 5 min)

  5. Milestones Oct 2011 - Submit WSON requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Done - Submit extensions for hierarchical PCE path computation model as WG document Jan 2012 - Submit the PCEP MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Jan 2012 - Submit P2MP MIB as a WG document Feb 2012 - Submit the discovery MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Feb 2012 - Submit inter-layer extensions to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Mar 2012 - Submit inter-area/AS applicability statement to the IESG as an informational RFC Mar 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for WSON as a WG document Apr 2012 - Submit the GMPLS requirements to the IESG to be considered as an Informational RFC Jun 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for GMPLS to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Aug 2012 - Submit PCEP extensions for WSON to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Oct 2012 - Submit P2MP MIB to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard Feb 2013 - Submit extensions for hierarchical model to the IESG to be considered as a Proposed Standard

  6. Documents • No new RFC since Quebec City • IESG Processing • Inter-layer Requirements: RFC Editor Queue • Expired • draft-ietf-pce-inter-area-as-applicability • draft-ietf-pce-vendor-constraints • draft-ietf-pce-pcep-mib • draft-ietf-pce-disc-mib • draft-ietf-pce-tc-mib • draft-ietf-pce-vpn-req

  7. Not on the Agenda • draft-ietf-pce-gmpls-aps-req • solution draft on the agenda • draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-ext • discussed on the list: keep on!

  8. Beyond the PCE WG draft-gredler-idr-ls-distribution-00 • “North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using BGP” • presented during IDR WG meeting • includes a PCE section • comments may be cross-posted to both lists

More Related