1 / 17

Social Capital and Corruption: An examination of the intervening role of Good Governance

Social Capital and Corruption: An examination of the intervening role of Good Governance. Riccardo Ferraresso Bryce Peterson Daiwon Lee John Jay College of Criminal Justice/CUNY Graduate Center. Presentation Outline. Intro Present Study Methods Data Analytic Strategy Hypotheses

marva
Télécharger la présentation

Social Capital and Corruption: An examination of the intervening role of Good Governance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Capital and Corruption: An examination of the intervening role of Good Governance Riccardo Ferraresso Bryce Peterson Daiwon Lee John Jay College of Criminal Justice/CUNY Graduate Center

  2. Presentation Outline • Intro • Present Study • Methods • Data • Analytic Strategy • Hypotheses • Results of Analyses • Conclusions • Implications

  3. Intro • Social Capital  Corruption (-)

  4. Intro • Social Capital  Corruption (-) • Social Capital  Governance Performance (+)

  5. Intro • Social Capital  Corruption (-) • Social Capital  Governance Performance (+) • Governance Performance Corruption (-)

  6. Present Study • Goal: of the study is to examine the paths between social capital, governance performance, and corruption. • Contributions • Clarify the role social capital plays in reducing corruption • Examine the direct and intervening role of governance in explaining the level of corruption • Cross-national study with large sample of countries • Potential research implications

  7. Hypotheses Governance H4- H4+ H3- H2 + Social Capital Corruption H1 - • Controls • Gini Index • GDP • Mean Education • # Years Democracy

  8. Data • World Values Survey (1996-2008) • World Bank – Governance Indicators (2002-2006) • 192 countries • Transparency International – Corruption Perception Index • UNDP – Human Development Index (1983-2002) • 126 countries • World Development Indicators (2002-2005) • 178 countries • Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation – University of Washington (2002) • 174 countries • Treisman, 2007 (2000) • 173 countries

  9. Variables

  10. Analytic Strategy • Path Analysis • Four-step process • Step 1: Social Capital  Corruption • Step 2: Social Capital  Governance • Step 3: Governance  Corruption • Step 4: Full Model

  11. Findings – Hypothesis One

  12. Findings – Hypothesis Two

  13. Findings – Hypothesis Three

  14. Findings – Hypothesis Four

  15. Discussion • Only generalized trust is a good predictor of lower levels of corruption • Social capital does not impact the quality of governance • Cross national application • Both social capital and good governance contribute to lower levels of corruption • But governance is particularly important

  16. Implications & Future Research • Test different ways to construct social capital • Include more developing countries • Test mediation at country level • Use multi-level modeling to test the full model

  17. Contact Information Riccardo Ferraresso - rferraresso@jjay.cuny.edu Daiwon Lee - dlee@jjay.cuny.edu Bryce Peterson - bpeterson@jjay.cuny.edu

More Related