1 / 10

Dossier Evaluation

Dossier Evaluation. John Hall Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight Committee 2012 - 2013. Powerpoint by James MacLachlan Vice-Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight 2011 Revised by John Hall, 2012. Dossier Evaluation. Dossier Evaluation.

mason
Télécharger la présentation

Dossier Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Dossier Evaluation

  2. John Hall Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight Committee 2012 - 2013 Powerpoint by James MacLachlan Vice-Chair, Committee on Academic Personnel – Oversight 2011 Revised by John Hall, 2012 Dossier Evaluation

  3. Dossier Evaluation • UC has a unique system of peer review process that is both fair and transparent. • UC mission: Research, Teaching and Service – evaluation based on your record of contributions to each - the APM describes the expectation in precise detail.

  4. Dossier Evaluation All promotions, merits to P6 and Above Scale, some accelerations, retroactive actions, appraisals, etc. Recommendation to Dean Recommendation to Vice-Provost – Academic Personnel Almost all normal merits, some accelerations, and appraisals, etc. MPS FPC SVM FPC COE FPC SOM FPC CAP SOE FPC GSM FPC CBS FPC CAES FPC SS FPC HArCS FPC SOL FPC CAP actions Redelegated actions Department

  5. Career Dossier

  6. Dossier Evaluation • Research and Creative Work • Pre-tenure, progress towards establishing an independent, cohesive and influential research program is expected . • Expectations and definition of scholarship may be different in different departments/fields. Both quality and quantity are evaluated. • Delineate quality and impact of research and creative scholarship (placement, awards, citations, critiques, etc.). • Collaboration in publications/productions and grants – identify contribution, document leadership.. • National and international stature is judged by outside letters, invited speaking engagements, awards, etc. • Appraisals provide key information on progress and guidance on attaining tenure.

  7. Dossier Evaluation • Teaching • Teaching effectiveness (quality and quantity) is judged by course evaluations, peer reviews, etc. • If there are weaknesses, is the candidate addressing them? UC Davis Teaching Resources Center (TRC) http://trc.ucdavis.edu/ • Engagement in the teaching program takes various forms.. • Development of new courses, revising and/or creating curricula.. • Mentorship of G and UG students, advising student organizations.. • Balance between high/low enrollment courses, required/elective courses and UG/G courses is desirable.. Departmental expectations.. • Some departments assign a reduced teaching load to assistant professors.. This is quite useful but…

  8. Dossier Evaluation • Professional Activities and Service • Pre-tenure campus service load should be light.. • Pre-tenure campus service load should be really light.. • Professional activity refers to engagement in professional societies, organizing symposia, participation in peer review process, state and local government committees/panels, etc.. • As one progresses towards higher ranks, service and professional activity expectations also increase.. Participation in the ‘shared governance.’ Demonstration of Departmental, College and Campus leadership. • Quality and quantity of service should be well documented..

  9. Dossier Evaluation More Advice • If you want, discuss with your Chair possibility of accelerated advancement. “.. Accelerated actions are considered exceptional and should be requested only when the evidence shows outstanding accomplishments in one job performance area with good, i.e., expected, achievements in the other required areas. ... In all cases, it is incumbent upon the candidate, the department, and the dean to make a clear case for the exceptional circumstances that motivate the request for an acceleration… “ (CAP’s Criteria - as described in the APM) • Criteria for advancements and expectations for each rank are spelled out in the Academic Personnel Manual (APM).. http://academicpersonnel.ucdavis.edu/ • Some departments have (at least an informal) mentorship program.. • Personal Statement helps place your accomplishments in perspective.. • Never forget to enjoy life and have fun.

  10. Questions?... Discussion

More Related