1 / 33

Chapter 7

Chapter 7. Measurement Applications. Chapter 7 Measurement Applications. Two Bases of Current Value Measurement. Value-in-use Discounted present value of future receipts Relevance: high Reliability: management may change intended use Fair value

matana
Télécharger la présentation

Chapter 7

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 7 Measurement Applications

  2. Chapter 7Measurement Applications

  3. Two Bases of Current Value Measurement • Value-in-use • Discounted present value of future receipts • Relevance: high • Reliability: management may change intended use • Fair value • Exit price: measures opportunity cost of retaining asset/liability in firm, hence stewardship oriented • Relevance: high if well-working market value available • Reliability: high if well-working market value available • Fair value is the measurement basis of SFAS 157

  4. 7.2.1, 7.2.3 Longstanding Measurement Examples • Accounts receivable and payable • Approximates value-in-use if time is short • Cash flows fixed by contract • Capital leases • Long-term debt • Unless interest rate changes

  5. 7.2.3 Lower-of-Cost-or-Market Rule • A partial application of measurement • Inventory • Ceiling tests • A vehicle for conservative accounting

  6. 7.2.4 Revaluation Option • IAS 16 • Allows property, plant and equipment to be written up to fair value • Requires reasonable reliability • Fair values must be kept up to date • Not presently available under U.S. accounting standards

  7. 7.2.5 Ceiling Test for Property, Plant and Equipment • IAS 36 • Applies if revaluation option not selected • Recognize impairment loss in current earnings if book value greater than recoverable amount • Impairment losses can be reversed, but not to more than book value if no impairment loss had been recorded • SFAS 144 • 2-step procedure • Determine if impaired (no discounting) • If impaired, write down to fair value • No reversal

  8. 7.2.6 Post-Employment Benefits • Pensions • Projected benefit obligation (PBO) • Total pension liability (discounted), including for expected increases in compensation • SFAS 87, 158 • SFAS 159 requires PBO, net of fair value of pension plan assets, to be included on balance sheet • Pension gains and losses (e.g. changes in benefits, interest rates) included in other comprehensive income (OCI) • Amortized into net income over time • Continued

  9. 7.2.6 Post-Employment Benefits (continued) • Other post-employment benefits (e.g., health care, insurance) • Accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) • Similar to PBO but excluding expected increases in compensation • SFAS 106, 158 require ABO to be included on balance sheet

  10. 7.3.1 Financial Instruments • Definition • A contract that creates a financial asset of one firm and a financial liability or equity instrument of another firm • Note broad definition of financial assets and liabilities

  11. Why Fair Value Financial Instruments? • To increase decision usefulness • Many financial instruments traded on well-working markets → reasonable reliability • To control gains trading

  12. 7.3.2 IAS 39 • Applies to debt and equity securities • Four financial asset categories • Available-for-sale • Fair valued, gains/losses in OCI • Loans & receivables • Valued at cost, subject to impairment test • May be written up again if fair value rises • Held-to-maturity • Valued similarly to loans & receivables • Trading • Fair valued, gains/losses in net income • Continued

  13. 7.3.2 IAS 39 (continued) • Two financial liabilities categories • Trading, valued at fair value • E.g., a financial institution issues 30-day financial paper • Accounts payable • If longer-term, they may bear interest at a fixed rate. If so, their fair value varies with interest rates • Other, valued at cost • E.g., bonds outstanding, demand deposits • Continued

  14. 7.3.2 IAS 39 (continued) • Why not simply value all financial instruments at fair value, rather than the complex mixture of valuations under IAS 39? • Reliability • Demand deposits difficult to fair value due to core deposit intangibles • No market value may be available • Some financial instruments thinly traded, others not traded at all • To control excess earnings volatility • Unrealized gains/losses on available-for-sale included in OCI • Loans & receivables and held-to maturity valued at cost (subject to ceiling test)

  15. 7.3.4 Derivative Financial Instruments • Derivatives are financial instruments • Definition • A contract, the value of which depends on some underlying… • May not require an initial cash outlay • Generally settled in cash, not in kind • Derivatives valued at fair value under IAS 39 and SFAS 133 • Gains and losses included in net income, except certain hedging contracts

  16. 7.3.5 Hedge Accounting • Fair Value Hedges • Gains and losses on the hedging instrument included in net income • Fair valuing the hedged item offsets effect on net income • Cash Flow Hedges • Gains and losses on the hedging instrument included in OCI, until the future transaction affects net income • Continued

  17. 7.3.5 Hedge Accounting (continued) • Benefits of Hedge Accounting • Reduces earnings volatility • Offset gains/losses by fair valuing hedged item (fair value hedge) • Delay gain/loss recognition by including in OCI until realized (cash flow hedge) • Hedging may avoid the ceiling test • Theory in Practice 7.2 • Continued

  18. 7.3.5 Hedge Accounting(continued) • To Obtain Benefits of Hedge Accounting • Hedges must qualify • Must be highly effective • Negative correlation with hedged item • Hedges must be designated • To reduce temptation to speculate • Requires elaborate procedure and documentation • Macro hedging allowed under IAS 39 to simplify

  19. The Firm’s Real Volatility • Volatility of firm’s environment • Depends on states of nature • Less • Natural hedging • Hedging with derivatives • Equals real volatility of the firm • As chosen by management

  20. Should Financial Statements Reflect Real Volatility? • Seems reasonable • Investors sensitive to risk • Real firm risk should not be covered up? • Fair value accounting for all assets and liabilities (including derivatives) reflects real volatility • Historical cost accounting hides real volatility, and can result in little warning of financial distress & legal liability • Partial fair value accounting (i.e., the mixed measurement model) can overstate real volatility • This is the problem of mismatch

  21. A Mismatch Example • Firm has long-term debt outstanding • Accounted for at historical cost • Firm has created a natural hedge by acquiring interest-bearing securities • Accounted for at fair value, changes in fair value included in net income (e.g., available-for-sale) • Continued

  22. A Mismatch Example (continued) • Then, changes in fair value of debt are not included in net income, but the opposite changes in fair value of the interest-bearing securities are included in net income • Net income overstates the real volatility of the firm; that is, a mismatch • Continued

  23. A Mismatch Example (continued) • The fair value option • Allows firms to voluntarily fair value assets/liabilities • IAS 39 restricts fair value option to reducing mismatch • In this example, firm could fair value long-term debt to eliminate excess income volatility • SFAS 159 does not restrict fair value option to reducing mismatch • Theory in Practice 7.1, re: Blackstone Group

  24. Use of Fair Value Option Following a Debt Downgrade • Suppose that a credit downgrade reduces fair value of a firm’s debt • No writedown under historical cost accounting • Firm may use fair value option to write debt down • Results in a gain to net income. Strange? • Presumably, this is a reason IAS 39 restricts fair value option to mismatch situations • But can argue the gain represents the lenders’ portion of the loss in fair value of debt—not borne by shareholders • SFAS 159 would allow, IAS 39 would not

  25. 7.4 Accounting for Intangibles • Purchased intangibles • Goodwill arising from an acquisition (IFRS 3, SFAS 142) • Accounted for at cost • No amortization • Subject to ceiling test • Can lead to major writedowns, e.g., JDS Uniphase, 2001 Annual Report. See Theory in Practice 7.3 • Management devices to work around goodwill and related writedowns • “Pro-forma income,” e.g., TD Bank, 2000 Annual Report. See Theory in Practice 7.3 • Continued

  26. 7.4 Accounting for Intangibles (continued) • Self-developed intangibles • Self-developed goodwill, e.g., from R&D • Hard to reliably determine fair value • Costs written off as incurred • Recognition lag: goodwill value shows up over time on income statement • Recognition lag responsible for low ability of net income to explain stock returns? • Lev & Zarowin (1999) argue yes

  27. 7.4.3 Lev & Zarowin, “The Boundaries of Financial Reporting…” • Their study documents a decreasing usefulness of earnings information • Usefulness evaluated by ability of earnings to explain abnormal share return • Low R2 • And falling? • Low ERCs • Especially for research-intensive firms • Continued

  28. 7.4.3 Lev & Zarowin (continued) • Conclusion • Accounting for intangibles is inadequate • Continued

  29. 7.4.3 Lev & Zarowin (continued) • Suggestion to improve usefulness • Capitalize successful intangibles after a “trigger point” is attained • Amortize over useful life • Like successful efforts accounting in oil and gas • Amounts capitalized and amortized may reveal inside information to investors, since it is management that has best knowledge of R&D value

  30. 7.5.2 Risk Management • Risk controlled by natural hedging + hedging with derivatives • Some reasons for managing firm-specific risk, even though investors can diversify it away • Reduce investor estimation risk • Cash availability for planned capital expenditures • Control speculation • Reduce likelihood of major losses, leading to lawsuits

  31. Reporting on risk • Beta risk • Relevant to rational, diversified investor • Beta an input into investment decisions • Accounting variables correlated with beta • May help investors to estimate beta • Beaver, Kettler, and Scholes (1970) • Reasons why reporting on other (firm-specific) risks also relevant to investors • Investors may not act according to rational decision theory model • Risk information may reduce estimation risk • Risk reporting may control speculation

  32. 7.5.4 A Measurement Perspective on Risk Reporting • Narrative, in MD&A • Canadian Tire Corp. 2006 Annual report • Text, Section 4.8.2 • Sensitivities Analysis • Suncor Energy Inc., 2006 Annual Report • Table 7.2 • Value at Risk • Microsoft Corp., 2006 Annual Report

  33. Conclusions • Standard setters continue to increase current value measurements in financial statements • Some measurements are one-sided • Lower-of-cost-or-market, ceiling tests • IASB standards more likely than FASB to allow writeups • Accountants are recognizing an increased obligation to measure and report on firm risk

More Related