1 / 35

合作賽局 : 競合策略 (co-opetition)

合作賽局 : 競合策略 (co-opetition). applications. Business :competition, auctions Politics : election 軍事外交:美中台關係 Law : 制度設計(責任歸屬,..) Biology ….參考 拙譯著. 非合作與合作賽局. 非合作賽局: 競爭 同時出招: Normal form 先後出招: extensive form 合作賽局: 策略聯盟 , 互補性 原版 網站 譯本. 產業競爭分析. 1. B.S.C.P.G 2 . Porter Five Force

mateja
Télécharger la présentation

合作賽局 : 競合策略 (co-opetition)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 合作賽局:競合策略(co-opetition)

  2. applications • Business :competition, auctions • Politics : election • 軍事外交:美中台關係 • Law : 制度設計(責任歸屬,..) • Biology • ….參考拙譯著

  3. 非合作與合作賽局 • 非合作賽局: 競爭 • 同時出招: Normal form • 先後出招: extensive form • 合作賽局: 策略聯盟, 互補性 • 原版 • 網站 • 譯本

  4. 產業競爭分析 • 1. B.S.C.P.G • 2. Porter Five Force • 3. SWOT

  5. 波特的難題 1. 能將Intel 與 Microsoft置入Porter’s framework ? • 佳珍自助餐與世新的關係? • 為何選世新? • ~互補廠商 2. Business is not always “war”

  6. The traditional way: • outsmarting the competitors capturing market share • beating up suppliers (痛擊) • locking up customers (套牢) • “ It is not enough to succeed. Other must fail.” (別人的痛苦是我的快樂)

  7. But Business is not always “war” • listen to customers • work with suppliers • establish strategic partners even with competitors • Most business succeed only if others also succeed

  8. Is business peace ? • No • Battles with competitors over market share • Fights with suppliers over cost • Conflicts with customers over price • 國親合?民進黨與台聯? • 立委選舉: 大選區時最大的敵人是同黨同志 • So what business is ?

  9. So what business is ? • A New Mindset • “Business is cooperation when it comes to creating a pie and competition when it comes to dividing it up ” • Business is simultaneously war and peace—Co-opetition • You can cooperate without having to ignore your self-interest

  10. Value Net

  11. Defining “Complementor” or “Competitors ” • from customers’ perspective • from suppliers’ perspective

  12. from customers’ perspective(1) • A player is your competitors if customers value your product less when they have the other player’s product than when have your product alone.若顧客因擁有其他參賽者的產品而降低對妳產品的評價時, 該參賽者就是你的競爭者 • Example: Coca-Cola and Pesi-Cola • Example: Intel and American airline may end up as competitors ~as videoconferencing takes off and becomes a substitutes for business trips. what else ?

  13. from customers’ perspective(2) • A player is your complementor if customers value your product more when they have the other player’s product than when have your product alone.若顧客因擁有其他參賽者的產品而增加對妳產品的評價時, 該參賽者就是你的互補者 • Example: hot dog and mustard • 為何啤酒屋的花生與雞翅膀免費供應? • Example: 好停車對學校的評價 • what else?

  14. from suppliers’ perspective • A player is your competitors if it is less attractive for a supplier to provide resource to you when it is also supplying the other player than when it is supplying you alone.若供應商因提供其他參賽者資源而降低對妳提供資源的吸引力時, 該參賽者就是你的競爭者 • Example: 老師: 世新與台科大 What else ?

  15. from suppliers’ perspective • A player is your complementor if it is more attractive for a supplier to provide resource to you when it is also supplying the other player than when it is supplying you alone.若供應商因提供其他參賽者資源而增加對妳提供資源的吸引力時, 該參賽者就是你的互補者 • Note book 為何愈來愈便宜? • Example: Compaq and Dell competes for the limited supply of Intel’s chip. • Example: 華航,長榮與波音 • What else ?

  16. Value Net for University

  17. The elements of a “industry game” • P: Players~ customers, suppliers, competitors, complementors • A: Added value • R: Rules • T: Tactics (戰術) • S: Scope ~ PARTS

  18. Quiz 0319 • 請簡述smartphone 的競爭歷史 • 何謂 horizontal differentiation • 為何 smartphone 的競爭是 horizontal differentiation • iphone 較 blueberry 有何優勢

  19. QUIZ 03/26 • Q1: 何謂 Switching cost • Q2: 何謂 Number portability • Q3: 實施 Number portability 對產業結構的影響為何 ? 這與 product differentiation 有何關係?

  20. Players • 先找出customers , suppliers • 再由customers’ perspective 與suppliers’ perspectives 找competitors

  21. Added value • Your added value =The size of the pie when you are in the game - the size of the pie when you are out of the game. =What you bring to others • What you get from a game can not be more than what you bring, which is your added value.

  22. Card game : 陳老師’s version • 陳老師 has 26 red cards • 26 students each has one black card • One red card and one black card together are worth $100. • Who will get what ?

  23. 陳老師’s version • Q: Imagine that you are one of the students, and 陳老師 offers you $20 for you red card. Would you take it ? • A: The 50/50 split is the most likely outcome

  24. Card game : 黃老師’s version • 黃老師 has originally 26 red cards • 太高興了, loses 3 cards • 26 students each has one black card • One red card and one black card together are worth $100. • Who will get what ?

  25. 黃老師’s version • Q: Imagine that you are one of the students, and 黃老師 offers you $20 for you red card. Would you take it ? • A: you should accept any positive dollar , why ?

  26. Added value :陳老師版 • Your added value =The size of the pie when you are in the game (2600) - the size of the pie when you are out of the game(2500) =What you bring to others(100) • 陳老師的added value =100 • What you get from a game can not be more than what you bring, which is your added value(100). • 每人分[0,100]

  27. Added value :黃老師版 • Your added value =The size of the pie when you are in the game (2300) - the size of the pie when you are out of the game(2300) =What you bring to others (0) • What you get from a game can not be more than what you bring, which is your added value.~0 • 給你10已經很好了

  28. 加薪? • 您老闆何時會同意加您薪水? • 您會要求多少? 您真的很重要? • 何時要求加薪會成功?

  29. 增加added value 的方法 1. 讓自己不可替代且有市場價值 2. Shortage strategy ~ • Wii 缺貨~任天堂故技重施(1988 3. 帶進更多的供應商

  30. Rules • Rules structure the way the game is played. • These rules come form custom, contracts, or law.

  31. 一塊蛋糕, 你切我選, 如何切? • If you know the other side’s value, go first • If you are uncertain, better to go second

  32. Rules and Tactics 拆夥:好聚好散 • 如果你與你的朋友合夥成立一家公司 • 多年以後, 有人想拆夥 • 拆夥的規則如下: • 由其中一人提出價碼 • 另一人選”買”或是”賣” ?如果是你提出價錢, 你會提多少? 由你先提?

  33. Scope • Epson’s Entry in Laser Printers • 1989, three types of printers: • dot-matrix ( $550, Epson) • ink-jet ($650, HP) • Laser ($2,200, HP, fast growing)

  34. Epson’s mistake • 推 EPL-6000 • HP price competition • Hurt HP’s sales of ink-jets, • HP promoted ink-jets • Then,….

  35. what was Epson’s mistake ? • It misunderstood the scope of the printer game • 牽一髮, 動全局 • 全觀,綜觀,……非部分均衡, 一般均衡

More Related