1 / 24

B eam screen cooling: scaling from LHC to FHC

B eam screen cooling: scaling from LHC to FHC. Philippe Lebrun FHC meeting on beam pipe design, CERN 20 Dec ember 2013. The beam screen concept. Magnet cold bore (1.9 K). Beam screen (>> 1.9 K).

matsu
Télécharger la présentation

B eam screen cooling: scaling from LHC to FHC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam screen cooling: scaling from LHC to FHC Philippe Lebrun FHC meeting on beam pipe design, CERN 20 December 2013

  2. The beam screen concept Magnet cold bore (1.9 K) Beam screen (>> 1.9 K) G. Claudet, F. Disdier, Ph. Lebrun, M. Morpurgo, P. Weymuth, Preliminary Study of a superfluid helium cryogenic system for the Large Hadron Collider, LHC Note 26 (1985)

  3. Rationale for beamscreentemperature1) Thermodynamics • ExergyloadDE = measure of (ideal) refrigerationduty DE = DEcm + DEbs DE = Qcm . (Ta/Tcm – 1) + (Qbs – Qcm) . (Ta/Tbs – 1) • WithQbs = heatload to beamscreen Tbs = beamscreen (average) temperature Qcm = residualheatload to cold mass Tcm = cold mass temperature (1.9 K for LHC) Ta = ambienttemperature (290 K) • Minimize total exergyload • Estimate Qcm = f (Tbs) • Calculation: radiation + conduction along supports with contact resistance • Measurements on full-scale thermal models

  4. Measuredresidualheatloadfrombeamscreen to cold mass

  5. Residual heat load modelfrom beam screen to cold mass Conduction dominates up to ~100 K

  6. Total exergyloss vs beamscreentemperatureParameter: beamscreenheatload

  7. LHC beam vacuum requirements • Beam vacuum lifetimedominated by nuclearscattering of protons on residualgas • Beam vacuum lifetime of ~100 h required to • Limitdecay of beamintensity • Reduceenergydeposited by scattered protons to ~ 30 mW/m • residualgasdensity in the 1014 m-3 range • residual pressure in the 10-9 to 10-8 Pa range • Cryopumping on cold bore at 1.9 K meetstheserequirements • This wouldbesufficient in absence of beam-induceddesorption

  8. Cryopumping of beam vacuum at 1.9 K 100 h lifetime for hydrogen Saturation pressure of all gasesexceptheliumvanishat 1.9 K M. Jimenez

  9. Rationale for beamscreentemperature2) Dynamic vacuum • Beam-induceddesorption of cryopumpedgasmoleculesdegrades vacuum • beamscreenshelters 1.9 K cryopumping surface from proton/ion/photon induceddesorption • pumpingholes for desorbedmolecules (4%) • Avoidbeamscreentemperatureswherevapor pressure of condensedspecies (H2, H2O, CH4, CO, CO2) are in the 10-7 to 10-4 Pa range: insufficientpumping speed to the cold bore at 1.9 K • allowed ranges 5 – 20 K, 40 – 60 K, 100 – 120 K, > 190 K V. Baglin

  10. Rationale for beamscreentemperature3) Transverse wallimpedance • Beamstabilityrequireslow transverse impedance • Transverse impedance ZT(w) ~ rR /w b3 r wall electrical resistivity R average machine radius b half-aperture of beam pipe • Transverse resistive-wallinstability • dominant in large machines withsmall aperture • must becompensated by beam feedback, providedgrowth of instabilityis slow enough (~ 100 turns) • maximizegrowth time t~ 1/ZT(w) i.e. reduce ZT(w)  for a large machine with small aperture, low transverse impedance is achieved through low r, i.e. low-temperature wall coated with >50 mm copper (typically < 50 K for RRR=100)

  11. 0.17 W/m per aperture Heatloads to beamscreen1) Synchrotron radiation frombendingmagnets • Charged particle beams bent in a magnetic field undergo centripetal acceleration and emit electromagnetic radiation • Whenbeams are relativistic, radiation isemitted in a narrowcone • Median of spectrumEc ~ g3/R • Power radiated per m Psyn ~ g4/R2 withg = relativistic factor of beam, R = radius of curvature UV, easy to screen

  12. Heatloads to beamscreen2) Beam image currents in the resistivewall • Beam of chargedparticles = electricalcurrent • « Image currents » are induced in the (resistive) wall of the vacuum chamber, producingohmic dissipation • Power per m Prw ~ N2r1/2 with N = particlebunch charge r = electricalresistivity of wall • Low-resistivity • Copper vs stainlesssteel • Lowtemperature • Magneto-resistance • Eddy currentsatmagnetresistive transition => 75 mm Cu (RRR = 100) on 1 mm austeniticsteel

  13. Heatloads to beamscreen3) Electron cloud • Photo-electronsextractedfrom the wall by synchrotron radiation, canberesonantlyaccelerated by the successive particlebunches => multipacting => buildup of electroncloud • Energydeposition by electonshitting the wall • Intensity of electroncloudgoverned by • photon irradiation of the wall ⇒low reflectivity surface • bunch repetition rate ⇒ increase bunch spacing • secondary electron yield ⇒ low-SEY surface and beam “scrubbing”

  14. Functional design map of beamscreen FUNCTION PROCESS DESIGN FEATURE Low-conduction supports Limitresidualheatload to cold mass Reducebeam-inducedcryogenicloads High-conductivitycopperplating Intercept synchrotron radiation Increasedevelopment time of transverse resistive-wallinstability Coolingatlowtemperature Limitresistivewallimpedance Austeniticstainlesssteel structure Resisteddy-current forces atmagnetquench Structural materialwithhighresistivity Pumping slots Preservefieldquality in magnet aperture Low-permeabilitymaterials Avoidtemperaturesfavoringdesorption of commongasspecies Maintain good beam vacuum Providepumpingfromshielded cold surface Sawtooth absorber Limitreflectivity and SEY of beamscreen surface Limitdevelopment of electroncloud Beamscrubbing

  15. Design space for LHC beamscreenParameter: beamscreenheatload

  16. Beam screen heat loads[W/m per aperture] V. Baglin, Ph. Lebrun, L. Tavian, R. van Weelderen, Cryogenic beam screens for high-energy particle accelerators, Proc. ICEC24 Fukuoka, Cryogenics and Superconductivity Society of Japan (2013) 629-634

  17. Compared parameters of hadron colliders

  18. LHC-type beam screen for FHCAssumption Tcm = 1.9 K

  19. LHC-type beam screen for FHCAssumption Tcm = 1.9 K

  20. Fromexergy to power consumption • Real electrical power to refrigeratorPref Pref= DE/h(T) withh(T) = efficiencyw.r. to Carnot = COPCarnot/COPReal Pref = Qcm . (Ta/Tcm – 1)/h(Tcm) + (Qbs – Qcm) . (Ta/Tbs – 1)/h(Tbs) • WithQbs = heatload to beamscreen Tbs = beamscreen (average) temperature Qcm = residualheatload to cold mass Tcm = cold mass temperature (1.9 K for LHC) Ta = ambienttemperature (290 K) • Minimizetotal electrical power to refrigerator

  21. h(T) = COPCarnot/COPReal measured fit measured

  22. LHC-type beam screen for FHCAssumption Tcm = 1.9 K

  23. Coolingpotential of cryogens for beamscreen Operating the beam screen at higher temperature would allow other cooling fluids

  24. Summary • Original motivation for LHC beamscreen: thermodynamics • Reduceexergyload to the cryogenic system, and therefore power to refrigerator • Also essential for • Ensuring good (dynamic) vacuum for circulatingbeams • Limitdevelopment of beam collective effects and instabilities • Beamscreen design spaceconstrained by multi-physics • Thermodynamics • Electromagnetism • Materialproperties • Vacuum • Thermohydraulics • Assume FHC has same cold mass temperature and similarbeamscreen as LHC • FHC higherlinearheatloadspush thermodynamic optimum towardshigherbeamscreentemperatures (~ 80-100 K for 80 km ring): isthis acceptable? • Power to refrigeratorneeded to compensate for synchrotron radiation load of ~ 40 W/m per aperture for 80 km ring wouldbe ~ 600 W/m per aperture withthermodynamicallyoptimizedbeamscreen, i.e. ~ 100 MW for complete FHC • In absence of beamscreen, itwouldbe > 5 GW!

More Related