1 / 38

Mathematical modeling applied to neuroscience

Mathematical modeling applied to neuroscience. Amitabha Bose Department of Mathematical Sciences New Jersey Institute of Technology. Hunter College High School 2013. Mathematics and the Natural World.

mattox
Télécharger la présentation

Mathematical modeling applied to neuroscience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mathematical modeling applied to neuroscience Amitabha Bose Department of Mathematical Sciences New Jersey Institute of Technology Hunter College High School 2013

  2. Mathematics and the Natural World • “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences” published in 1960 by Nobel Prize winning Physicist Eugene Wigner • Gives numerous examples from physics like Newton’s gravitational laws or Einstein’s theory of relativity • “How can it be that mathematics, being after all a product of human thought which is independent of experience, is so admirably appropriate to the objects of reality?” — Albert Einstein

  3. Mathematics and Life Sciences • Wigner concludes with “A much more difficult and confusing situation would arise if we could, some day, establish a theory of the phenomena of consciousness, or of biology, which would be as coherent and convincing as our present theories of the inanimate world.” • “There is only one thing which is more unreasonable than the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in physics, and this is the unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics in biology.” — Israel Gelfand

  4. Mathematical Physiology • Many successful applications of mathematics to “solving” biological problems • Derivation of the Hodgkin-Huxley equations (1952) • FitzHugh-Nagumo equation (1962) • Understanding cardiac dynamics (Peskin 1970’s on, Keener 1980’s on) • Understanding dynamics of pancreatic beta cells associated with diabetes (Miura 1970’s, Sherman 1980’s) • Neuroscience – Rinzel, Wilson-Cowan 1970’s on, Kopell, Ermentrout 1980’s on, Terman 1990’s on • Great book by Art Winfree “The Geometry of Biological Time (1980) • Other important texts by Jim Murray, Keener & Snyed, Hoppensteadt& Peskin, Edelstein-Keshet

  5. Outline • Basics of neuroscience, circuit theory and differential equations • Numerous applications of math & neuroscience Q. What is the appropriate level of detail for modeling? Q. Is there any fun mathematics to be done?

  6. Applied Mathematician’s Neuron Typical Neuron Mathematician’s Neuron

  7. What is a derivative? • A mathematical object that measures the rate of change of a quantity • Ex: the slope of a line measures the rate of change of the “rise” to the “run”. • Ex: think of the formula s = v·t to measure distance s. The change in distance per unit time is the velocity. As the unit of time is made smaller, this rate becomes the derivative ds/dt = v.

  8. What is a differential equation? • An equation composed of derivatives and functions of the dependent and independent variables. • Ex: Damped Pendulum • Differential equations can be “solved” by analytically or numerically integrating them for a given set of initial conditions.

  9. Modeling a neuron as an RC circuit • Membrane separates charge • Ions flow through channels causing voltage changes

  10. Hodgkin-Huxley type equations

  11. Why are action potentials important? • Action potentials are measurable events • The timings or firing rate of action potentials can encode information -orientation selectivity in visual cortex - coincidence detection for sound localization - place cells in hippocampus • Neurons can communicate with one another using action potentials via synapses or gap junctions.

  12. Crustacean Pyloric Rhythm (CPG) PD LP PY Nadim et al, 2000’s Bean, Nature Rev. Neuro. 2007

  13. Visual Cortex • Neurons fire at preferential orientations Hubel and Wiesel 1962 and related work Many mathematical models for describing this phenomenon

  14. The brain is good at detecting edges, but not so good at other things…

  15. Count the black dots What kind of mathematical model can explain this?

  16. Perceptual Bistability Rinzel and collaborators are developing mathematical models to explain bistability

  17. Auditory CortexCoincidence detection • Neurons have higher firing rate when they get coincidental input from left and right ears • Owls use this to locate prey and prey to locate owls • Jeffress delay line model for barn owls (1948)

  18. O1 O2 NL Model for coincidence detection(Cook et al, 2003, Grande & Spain 2004) O2 O1 P Calculate NL firing rate as a function of phase independent of frequency of O1 and O2

  19. Place cells • Pyramidal cells in hippocampus fire only when animal is in a specific, known location (transient & stable) • Uses visual cues to trigger memory recall • O’Keefe (1971)

  20. Model for place cell firing(Bose, Booth,Recce 2000) PLACE FIELD T P I1 I2 Inhibition Excitation P = Place cells • Model Predictions • Location within place field • Length of place field • Behavior in running wheel

  21. Parkinson’s Disease • Believed to be a disorder of the Basal Ganglia • Results in tremor, uncontrollable motions, inability to begin movement • No experimental consensus on what causes PD or how it can be treated • Mathematicians have gotten involved with experimentalist to figure out the underlying neural mechanisms • Peter Tass’ group (Germany) • Terman, Rubin, Wilson (US) • Kopell, Wilson (US)

  22. PD results when the output from Gpi/SNr becomes too synchronizedI For severe cases, Deep Brain Stimulation has shown remarkable promise for alleviating PD symptons. We don’t know why DBS works?!

  23. Rubin & Terman (2004) proposed that DBS targets STN • Normal state: Irregular, no correlations in STN cells • Parkinsonian state: Rhythmic, STN cells cluster

  24. Modeling Sleep Rhythms • Your brain is very active when you are asleep! • The function of sleep is still not totally understood, but it is important for learning, for the immune system, for growth… • REM sleep – Rapid Eye Movement sleep (dreaming) • Mathematicians are creating models to help explain different electrical rhythms seen in different stages of sleep

  25. Stages of sleep for humans • we focus on the transitions between sleep/wake and REM/NREM sleep • sleep patterns of rodents are similar, with more brief awakenings

  26. Model (Kumar, Bose, Mallick 2012) POAH Wakefulness associated areas MRF : Mid brain reticular formation ORX : Lateral hypothalamic orexinergic neurons. MRF ORX HOM Sleep associated areas POAH : Preoptic anterior hypothalamus CRF : Caudal reticular formation CIRC CRF REM sleep associated areas R-ON : LDT/ PPT cholinergic neurons R-OFF : LC Noradrenergic neurons GABA : GABAergic inter neurons in LC GABA Other inputs Hom : Homeostatic sleep drive Circ : Circadian clock from SCN GABASNr : GABaergic neurons from substantia niagra pars reticulata R-ON R-OFF GABASNr inhibition Feed-forward control of one flip-flop circuit by another excitation

  27. Sleep/Wake Transitions REM-OFF POAH MRF REM-ON wake sleep sleep wake Fast transitions controlled by POAH Consistent with Szymusiak et al 1998 No REM activity in this trace

  28. Transitions to REM sleep wake GABA-ergic input from SNR can instigate REM-on activity consistent with the Pal & Mallick (2009) conjecture

  29. Sleep deprivation Prolonging the wake state leads to a longer subsequent sleep episode See Phillips & Robinson (2008) for a systematic study of effects of sleep deprivation

  30. Loss of orexin input to sleep promoting areas disrupts sleep/wake transitions gopi = 0.6 gopi = 1.0 gopi = 0.1 Consistent with studies of narcolepsy (Peyron et al 2000)`

  31. Cell 1 Cell 2 Neuroscience to graph theory • Gap-junctions are physical connections between neurons that allow current to flow between them • Can an action potential in cell 1 evoke an action potential from cell 2? • Dynamics of gap-junctionally connected neurons have been subject of prior investigation (Sherman-Rinzel 93, Chow-Kopell 98, Lewis et al. 2000, 01, 03, Medvedev et al. 2000, 08, 10, and many more) • Lewis and Rinzel (2000) asked the question of whether periodic activity could be sustained in a network of neurons connected by gap-junctions. For specific network architectures (like cycles) they provide estimates on frequency based on rates of spontaneous activity. • Gansert, Nadim and Golowasch (2007) asked how the size and shape of a neuron affects the ability of these networks to sustain activity.

  32. Motivation Figures from Gansert et. al. (2007) “kernel” of sustained activity

  33. Some interesting questions in the context of generating rhythmic activity • Are there specific architectures that promote sustained rhythmic activity? (Cycles for example) • How do rules of nodal interaction affect the global dynamics ? • How important are intrinsic dynamics of individual node in the sustainment of activity? • In what way are dynamics related to graph structure?

  34. Graph Properties • G(n,p)={all graphs with n nodes and a probability p of an edge between any two nodes} • The graph property Q consists of a subset of G(n,p) that share a common feature. Ex. Q1 = {all graphs with a triangle} Q2 = {all graphs that are connected} G1 G2 G3 G4 G1,G 4 Q2 G2,G4 Q1 G3 Q1, Q2

  35. Thresholds for 3 important monotone properties(Erdos, Renyi 1960) • A property Q is monotone if whenever G  Q and G  H, then H  Q. • A function p*(n) is said to be a threshold function for a monotone property Q if p(n)/p*(n)0 implies that almost no G has Q, and p(n)/p*(n) implies that almost every G has Q • Appearance of the first edge at p ~O(1/n2) • Appearance of k-cycles at p ~O(1/n) • Disappearance of last isolated node at p ~O((log n)/n)

  36. Relating Dynamics and Graph structure • In Singh et al (2011, SIADS), we show how random graph structure is related to periodic activity for both spiking and bursting neurons. • Very non-intuitive results arise involving the giant component of the random graph • We are currently investigating several theoretical questions in this area. • Network and graph theory has seen a lot of interdisciplinary work in the area of physics.

  37. Conclusion • Mathematics turns out to be a good language to understand neuroscience. • Mathematical modeling in close conjunction with experimental work is beginning to make inroads into the understanding of biological systems. There is still a lot of work to be done. • Science can be advance by considering interdisciplinary approaches.

More Related