1 / 25

Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention

Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention. What factors put persons at higher risk for breast cancer?. History of chest radiation (RR 26.0) History of breast cancer (RR varies) Extremely dense breasts compared with fatty breasts (RR 4.5) History biopsy with atypical hyperplasia 3.7

mauricion
Télécharger la présentation

Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Breast Cancer Screening and Prevention

  2. What factors put persons at higher risk for breast cancer? • History of chest radiation (RR 26.0) • History of breast cancer (RR varies) • Extremely dense breasts compared with fatty breasts (RR 4.5) • History biopsy with atypical hyperplasia 3.7 • Two 1st-degree relatives with breast cancer vs none (RR 3.5) • One 1st-degree relative with breast cancer vs none (RR 2.5) • Menopause >55 y compared with <45 y (RR 2.0) • Nulliparity or 1st full-term pregnancy ≥30 y (RR 2.0) • History benign breast biopsy vs no breast biopsy (RR 1.7) continued…

  3. Menarche before age 12 years compared with >14 y (RR 1.5) • Postmenopausal obesity vs normal weight (RR 1.5) • Heterogeneously dense or extremely dense breasts compared with fatty or fibroglandular breasts (RR 1.3) • Current use of combination menopausal hormone therapy vs never users (RR 1.2) • Moderate alcohol use compared with abstention (RR 1.1)

  4. Are there tools that can help patients and physicians judge the risk? • NCI Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool • Less accurate for women with markedly positive family histories and women over 70 years • Main limitation: omits breast density as risk factor • Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium • Illustrates importance of breast density and age • Ontario Family History Assessment tool, Manchester Scoring System, Referral Screening Tool, Pedigree Assessment Tool, Family History Screen 7 • All useful for women with family histories of breast cancer

  5. Decision aids • Help clinicians and patients understand risk estimates • Use to facilitate conversations, not to make decisions • Example: www.breastscreeningdecisions.com • Helps women 40–49 years visualize effect of screening mammography • Creates a summary of personal values about breast cancer screening

  6. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: Risk Assessment... • Breast cancer is common among U.S. women • Risk factors: older age, increased duration of endogenous estrogen, increased breast density, presence of proliferative breast disease, family history of breast cancer • Genetic mutations substantially increase risk • Online calculators can help assess risk • Periodic risk assessment can mitigate high risk and develop individualized screening plan

  7. Who should be screened for breast cancer? • We use age-based protocols to determine who to screen • Strong connection between age and breast cancer risk • Many women who develop breast cancer do not fall into a clear high-risk group • Protocols may be modified for high-risk women • No low-risk groups (other than young age) have been identified in which screening can clearly be omitted

  8. Is screening effective in reducing mortality? • Screening reduces breast cancer mortality 15%-20% • Women 40-59 y: reduction in breast cancer mortality smaller magnitude and less statistically significant • Women 60-69 y, reduction highly significant • Women 70-74 y, reduction has not been shown to be significant  • Screening has not been shown to reduce all-cause mortality

  9. What are the harms? • False positive results • Unnecessary follow-up tests and biopsies • Anxiety and psychological distress • Overdiagnosis • Cancer that would never have progressed to clinical importance in absence of screening • Harms of treatment without any benefit • Once a cancer is diagnosed, no way to determine whether it is a case of overdiagnosis • Radiation exposure (may be a small risk)

  10. What is the current evidence for screening women in their 40s? • USPSTF: 8% reduced risk breast cancer mortality • ACS: 15% reduced risk breast cancer mortality • Initiating screening at age 40 averts about 1 breast cancer death per 1000 women screened • Most averted deaths among women aged 45–49 • Harms include false-positive results and overdiagnosis

  11. When should average-risk patients stop screening? • Breast cancer incidence increases with age • 26% breast cancer deaths attributed to diagnosis at >74y • Continue biennial screening until the remaining life expectancy is about 10 years  • Biennial screening estimated to reduce breast cancer deaths and harms for women in their 70s • Benefit of screening is low among women ≥80

  12. How frequently should patients be screened? • Annual screening recommended • Women with higher risk of breast cancer • Women who value a greater mortality benefit even at expense of higher likelihood of false positive result or overdoagnosis • Biennial screening maintains about 80% mortality benefits of annual screening

  13. What are the performance characteristics of various approaches to screening? • Digital mammography • Sensitivity and specificity increases with age and decreases with increasing breast density • 3-D mammography (tomosynthesis+ digital mammography) • May improve sensitivity and specificity • Contrast-enhanced MRI • Women at very high risk • More sensitive but less specific than mammography

  14. How should clinicians and patients select from the different screening methods? • Mammography: for average-risk women • Tomosynthesis: wheh breast cancer risk is increased • MRI: lack of evidence for effectiveness in average-risk women, because of excessive false-positives, high cost • Ultrasonography: no evidence it improves results over mammography screening for average-risk women • Breast self-exam: instructing average-risk women does not improve mortality, causes excess benign biopsies

  15. Should persons with above-average risk be screened differently from average-risk persons? • Moderately increased risk • Reasonable to initiate screening at younger age • Screen with annual mammography, tomosynthesis • Another reasonable strategy: follow screening recommendations for average risk women • Very high risk • More aggressive screening strategies are appropriate • Start mammography at age 25 or 5-10 years before youngest person with breast cancer in the family • Add breast MRI screening as adjunct to mammography

  16. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: Screening... • Screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality • Harms: false-positive results, overdiagnosis, radiation • Biennial screening averts 80% deaths averted by annual screening • Decisions about screening: consider woman’s values and her personal level of risk • Annual screening and digital breast tomosynthesis most appropriate for women with extremely dense breasts and those with 1-2 first degree family members with breast cancer • Reserve MRI for women at very high risk

  17. How should a patient at increased risk for breast cancer be counseled about personal risk? What is the role of the genetic counselor? • Genetic counseling reduces worry about breast cancer and increases the accuracy of risk perception • USPSTF (2014) • Offer genetic counseling and testing to women with ≥1 family members with BRCA1 / BRCA2 mutation • Refer only high-risk women for genetic counseling and testing • No recommendation for a specific risk level as threshold for referral

  18. What are the options for prevention in eligible women? • Healthy lifestyle, chemoprevention, and prophylactic mastectomy • Healthy behaviors reduce breast cancer risk • Physical activity reduces breast cancer risk about 12% • Diets high in fruits and vegetables modestly reduce risk • Alcohol use increases risk in a dose-response effect • Vitamins E and D do not reduce breast cancer risk • For women with hereditary breast cancer mutations, prophylactic bilateral mastectomy is an effective alternative to chemoprophylaxis

  19. What are the benefits of chemoprevention? • Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) • Tamoxifen, raloxifene: stimulate some estrogen receptors while blocking others • Reduce risk for ER+ invasive breast cancer • Tamoxifen appears slightly more effective than raloxifene after 7 y, but adverse effects differ • No difference in osteoporotic fracture rates • Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs) • Anastrazole, exemestane: inhibit the enzyme aromatase, which converts androgens to estrogens • AIs have not been compared to each other • SERMs have not been directly compared to AIs

  20. What are the harms from chemoprevention? • SERMs • Tamoxifen: endometrial cancer and VTE (RR 2.0) for women ≥50 y • Raloxifene: VTE risk but not endometrial cancer risk • ? stroke risk (not significant in USPSTF meta-analysis) • Aromatase Inhibitors • Anastrozole: musculoskeletal side effects, hypertension, vaginal dryness, vasomotor symptoms • Exemestane: joint pain, diarrhea, vasomotor symptoms continued…

  21. Comparing chemoprevention agents • Tamoxifen (compared to raloxifine) • women more likely to remain sexually active and to have less difficulty with sexual interest and enjoyment • more vasomotor symptoms, bladder problems, leg cramps • Raloxifene (compared to tamoxifen) • reduced risk for uterine cancer and slightly lower risk for VTE • more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain

  22. How should clinicians choose among the chemoprevention strategies? • No chemoprevention drugs known to improve survival • If estimated 5-y breast cancer risk ≥3%, consider SERM • SERMs but not AIs are FDA-approved for prevention • Tamoxifencan be used in all eligible women • Avoid AIs in premenopausal women (ovarian stimulation) • Do not use tamoxifen in postmenopausal women • In postmenopausal women choice depends mainly on QOL effects and cost

  23. How long should women receive chemoprevention to prevent breast cancer? • Optimum duration not established • Protective effect of 5-year course of tamoxifen lasts a median of 16 years • 10-year course may confer additional benefit, but differential in benefit and risk is not defined

  24. For which women is chemoprevention or surgery more cost-effective? • Chemoprevention • Younger women • Women at highest risk • Women without a uterus and at low risk for VTE • Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy • Women at high-risk because of genetic mutations • More cost effective when combined with bilateral oophorectomy

  25. CLINICAL BOTTOM LINE: Prevention... • Healthy behaviors reduce breast cancer risk • Genetic counseling and testing guides decisions about screening and prevention for women at high risk • Depending on the level of risk, prevention options include: • Chemoprevention • Prophylactic mastectomy (with or without oophorectomy) • For women with BRCA mutations, surgery may confer greatest benefit and be most cost effective

More Related