1 / 22

GRC ’07 Highlights

GRC ’07 Highlights. Vijay Natraj & Dan Feldman. New Observations and Model Approaches for Addressing Key Cloud-Precipitation-Climate Questions. H 2 O feedback: + or -? : Observations from AIRS,MSU,ERBE/CERES Satellite data sources reveal + feedback Is the hydrological cycle slowing down?

max
Télécharger la présentation

GRC ’07 Highlights

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. GRC ’07 Highlights Vijay Natraj & Dan Feldman

  2. New Observations and Model Approaches for Addressing Key Cloud-Precipitation-Climate Questions • H2O feedback: + or -? : • Observations from AIRS,MSU,ERBE/CERES • Satellite data sources reveal + feedback • Is the hydrological cycle slowing down? • Yes; changes in radiative heating by clouds is an important factor in the answer • Processes determining vertical structure of clouds loom as important • Models predict H2O accumulates at a rate > ability to precipitate it out => slowing of hydrological cycle

  3. New Observations and Model Approaches for Addressing Key Cloud-Precipitation-Climate Questions • How do aerosols affect the hydrological cycle? • Arctic warming in summer but cooling in winter • Long-range transport of SO2 into Arctic • H2SO4 coating observed on aerosol • Dehydration-greenhouse feedback

  4. Cloud Occurrence, Cloud Overlap and Cloud Microphysics from the First Year of CloudSat and CALIPSO • 2006-06 to 2007-03: • CloudSat/CALIPSO Cloud Cover: 0.66 • MODIS Clouds Cover: 0.63 • Ubiquitous low clouds over southern ocean • Continents stand out as minima in low cloud cover • Thickest clouds in western Pacific (~ 4 km) • Large fraction of multilayer clouds (~ 40-45%) over tropics

  5. Cloud Occurrence, Cloud Overlap and Cloud Microphysics from the First Year of CloudSat and CALIPSO • Multilayer clouds mostly cirrus over stratocumulus (high-based over low-based) • In general: • Atmospheric column contains multiple cloud layers • Composed of two phases of H2O • Size distributions that are at least bimodal • Occur at night more than half the time • Going beyond occurrence to characterize properties needs more work

  6. Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems • “Cloud Feedbacks remain largest source of uncertainty”– IPCC, 2007 • (Charney et al., 1979 said same thing!) • Problem is multiple scales • Cloud-scale processes relatively well understood • Translation to global scales requires very powerful computer • Hence cloud parameterizations • No GCM has physical parameterization of convection

  7. Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems • World’s first GCRM • 3.5 km cell size • Top at 40 km • 54 layers • 15-second time step • ~ 10 simulated days per day on half of Earth simulator (2560 CPUs) • Multiscale Modeling Framework (MMF) • Hundreds of times more expensive than GCM • Hundreds of times less expensive than GCRM

  8. Multiscale Modeling of Cloud Systems • GCRMs and MMFs make it possible for cloud observers and GCM developers to compare apples with apples • When something doesn’t work, we can “look inside” to see how simulation compares with observations • Focused efforts under way • To develop improved parameterizations for CRMs • To develop radically improved second generation MMF

  9. Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments and Platforms: What Questions can be Answered by Combining Different Techniques? • Problem 1: Measurements of aerosol radiative forcing of climate • Redemann et al., JGR, 2006 • Ames Airborne Tracking Sunphotometer (AATS) and Solar Spectral Flux Radiometer (SSFR) • Plots of net spectral irradiance as function of AOD • Slope gives aerosol radiative forcing efficiency • Visible wavelength range: -45.8 Wm-2 +/- 13.1 Wm-2 • Spread probably due to wide range of aerosol types

  10. Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments and Platforms: What Questions can be Answered by Combining Different Techniques? • Problem 2: Measurements of anthropogenic fraction of aerosol radiative forcing of climate • Anderson et al., JGR, 110, 2005 • Natural and anthropogenic aerosols distinguished using fine mode fraction (FMF) of optical depth • Combination of airborne aerosol in-situ measurements (I) and airborne sunphotometry (SP) to establish relationship b/w sub-micron fraction (SMF) of AOD and Angstrom exponent (A) • MODIS FMF has systematic high-bias of ~ 0.2 compared to SMF from I/SP • Definition differences b/w SMF and FMF • Detector problems • Assumption of spherical shape for dust • A might be better retrieval product • Rigorous validation with existing sun photometer measurements

  11. Aerosol Measurements from Multiple Instruments and Platforms: What Questions can be Answered by Combining Different Techniques? • Problem 3: Aerosol remote sensing in the vicinity of clouds • Wen et al., IEEE Geosci. Rem. Sens. Lett. • Study of the aerosol-cloud boundary essential for: • Understanding appropriate cloud screening methods in aerosol remote sensing • Investigating aerosol indirect effect on climate • Field study of suborbital AOD data near cloud edges • In ~75% of the cases there was an increase of 5-25% in AOD in the closest 2 km near the clouds • MODIS-observed mid-visible reflectances in the vicinity • Also show an increase with decreasing distance to cloud edge • May be because of 3-D effects, or increased aerosol concentration or size near clouds as indicated by suborbital observations

  12. Passive Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Aerosols • Accurate determination of aerosol optical depth and microphysical properties necessary to evaluate aerosol radiative forcing • Polarimetry useful because: • It contains more information about microphysics • Relative (rather than absolute) radiometric calibration necessary to give highly accurate aerosol retrievals • Polarized radiances have contributions from surface and atmosphere • Effects of surface need to be understood

  13. Passive Polarimetric Remote Sensing of Aerosols • Ocean reflectance low away from sun glint • L-M algorithm used to retrieve aerosol • Polarization of land surfaces generated at surface interface • Refractive index of natural targets varies little within typical spectral domains • Surface polarized reflectance spectrally grey • Measurement at 2250 nm (where aerosol load is low) used to characterize and correct for surface effects • Shorter wavelengths used to retrieve aerosol load and microphysical properties

  14. Predicting Chemical Weather: Improvements Through Advanced Methods to Integrate Models and Measurements • Chemical Transport Models (CTMs) poorly constrained primarily due to uncertain emission estimates • Improvements in analysis capability require integration of models and measurements • Extension of formal data assimilation techniques to aerosols needed to help reduce uncertainties • Aerosol radiative effects substantially different when using observations as opposed to parameterizations (Bates et al., ACP, 2006) • Intensive field experiments (e.g. ICARTT) provide our best efforts to comprehensively observe a region

  15. Aerosol Indirect Effects: The Importance of Cloud Physics and Feedbacks • Aerosols can influence Earth’s radiation budget by: • Direct interaction with sunlight: direct effect • Altering cloud radiative properties: indirect effect (AIE) • Useful to divide AIE into two types: • Primary or quasi-instantaneous effects (e.g. Twomey effect, dispersion effect) • Effects that require understanding of the system’s feedbacks • Twomey’s hypothesis (first indirect effect): • ↑ # aerosol particles → ↑ conc of cloud droplets Nd • For given LWC, greater Nd => smaller droplets • ↑ Nd => ↑ total surface area => clouds reflect more solar radiation

  16. Aerosol Indirect Effects: The Importance of Cloud Physics and Feedbacks • Albrecht’s hypothesis (second indirect effect): • ↑ Nd → ↓ precipitation (coalescence efficiency of cloud droplets ↑ strongly with droplet size) → ↑ cloud thickness, LWC, coverage → more reflective clouds • Model estimates of the two major AIEs • Pincus and Baker (1994) • 1st and 2nd AIEs comparable • GCMs (Lohmann and Feichter, 2005) • 1st AIE: -0.5 to -1.9 Wm-2 • 2nd AIE: -0.3 to -1.4 Wm-2 • Relatively limited investigation of factors controlling relative importance of the two AIEs

  17. Aerosol Indirect Effects: The Importance of Cloud Physics and Feedbacks • Relative strength of 2nd AIE largely determined by balance between: • Moistening/cooling due to suppression of precipitation • Drying/warming due to enhanced entrainment of overlying air

  18. How can In-Situ Observations Constrain and Improve Modeling of Aerosol Indirect Effects? • AIE one of the most uncertain components of climate change • Uncertainty originates from complex and multi-scale nature of aerosol-cloud interactions • Forces climate models to use empirical approaches • Incorporate as much physics as possible, with appropriate simplifications • Dynamics: updraft velocity, thermodynamics • Particle characteristics: size, concentration, chemical composition • Cloud processes: droplet formation, drizzle formation, chemistry inside cloud droplets

  19. How can In-Situ Observations Constrain and Improve Modeling of Aerosol Indirect Effects? • Challenges • Representing cumulative effect of organics on cloud formation in simple and realistic way • Use in-situ observations to constrain state-of-the-art droplet parameterizations in GCMs

  20. Is Arctic Sea-Ice Melting Stimulated by Aerosol-Cloud-Radiative Interactions? • Arctic warming at a rate ~ 2 x rest of the world • Thinning of Arctic sea-ice: Lindsay and Zhang, J. Climate, 2005 • Ice-albedo feedback traditionally thought to be cause • Garrett and Zhao, Nature, 2006: Ice-infrared feedback primarily responsible • Between winter and early spring, Arctic characterized by widespread pollution called Arctic haze • Polluted air transport from mid-latitude Eurasia and N America • Because of low precipitation, pollution accumulates • Increased surface warming from aerosol modifications to cloud LW emissivity

  21. Observational Constraints on Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks • 11 coupled climate-carbon models used to simulate 21st century climate and CO2 under similar scenarios • All agree that ↑ CO2 ↑ global warming • However, they disagree in the magnitude • CO2 increase alone will tend to enhance carbon storage by both land and ocean • Climate change alone will tend to release land and ocean carbon to atmosphere

  22. Observational Constraints on Climate-Carbon Cycle Feedbacks • Magnitude of increase in anthropogenic CO2 emissions remaining in the atmosphere uncertain (8-52 ppmv extra CO2/K of global warming) • Observations can be used to constrain models to reduce uncertainties • Major uncertainties in land-use emissions

More Related