1 / 22

Development of TES-microcalorimeter arrays and Frequency Domain Multiplexed read-out Henk Hoevers

Development of TES-microcalorimeter arrays and Frequency Domain Multiplexed read-out Henk Hoevers Division Sensor Research and Technology. Research Facilities for TES-microcalorimeter array and FDM development Two Kelvinox 100 dilution fridges 1 + 2 SQUID channels

maxim
Télécharger la présentation

Development of TES-microcalorimeter arrays and Frequency Domain Multiplexed read-out Henk Hoevers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Development of TES-microcalorimeter arrays and Frequency Domain Multiplexed read-out Henk Hoevers Division Sensor Research and Technology

  2. Research Facilities for TES-microcalorimeter array and FDM development • Two Kelvinox 100 dilution fridges • 1 + 2 SQUID channels • moveable slit to position X-ray beam (micron resolution) • data-acquisition facilities: RT-, IV-curves, analog and digital pulse processing • X-ray sources: 5.9 keV and 1.5/2.2/3.0/3.3/5.9 keV • In-house clean room -> short turn-around times for detector research • class 10-100 • processing on 4” wafers, sputter deposition, thermal evaporation, • spinners, mask aligners, wire bonders, inspection equipment • Staff • Physicists: 6 fte (senior) scientists • Electronics: 2.5 fte (senior) design engineers • Support staff: 2.5 fte (mechanical, electronical, lab assistant) • Clean room staff: 3 full-time persons

  3. Funding of TES-microcalorimeter array and FDM development • SRON staff from NWO income (Dutch Organization for Scientific Research) • ESA TRP contract ‘Cryogenic Imaging Spectrometer’ (XEUS – NFI2) • SRON • TES-based arrays (thin film processing, testing), prime contractor • MESA+, Twente University, the Netherlands • micromachining development • VTT Automation Technology, Espoo, Finland • SQUID development • Space Research Center, Leicester, UK • detector packaging, pulse processing • University of Jyvaskyla, Finland • material parameters at sub-Kelvin temperatures • Metorex, Espoo, Finland • electrical crosstalk simulations (dense wiring) • SRON and partners will tender on X-10 (expected ESA TRP on array read-out)

  4. Set-up of the talk TES microcalorimeter array development Status of Frequency Domain Multiplexing Outlook area: energy resolution

  5. Microcalorimeter array development for XEUS; approach • development of 5 x 5 pixel array with XEUS specification • address/investigate scalability from 5 x 5 array to 32 x 32 array • Production: fabrication of prototype 5 x 5 arrays following two routes • bulk micromachining • surface micromachining • Performance characterization of 5 x 5 pixel arrays • R(T), I(V) curves and their reproducibility • noise and energy resolution • Detector (re)design (5 x 5 -> 32 x 32) uses • performance (and understanding) of 5 x 5 arrays • additional measurements of all relevant low-temperature material parameters • development of a Finite Element Model of the 5 x 5 array (thermal design) • The Finite Element Model is also suited for performance analysis (time dependent • pulse modeling) and investigation of other pixel sizes and/or geometries

  6. 240 μm Bulk and surface micromachining (SRON-MESA); the 5 x 5 arrays TiAu TES (100 mK) and Cu absorber on slotted SiN membrane

  7. R(T) and I(V) curves Bulk MM Three pixels in the same array Bulk MM Three pixels in different arrays/chips Surface MM Three pixels in the same array

  8. Bulk micromachining; pulse performance/energy resolution • Effective time constant: τeff = 300 to 400 μs • This is 3 - 4 times lower than expected (and what was designed for) • Thermal conductance of SiN/Si(110) is 3 - 4 times lower than of SiN/Si(100) • Measured energy resolution ∆E = 6 - 7 eV at 6 keV • Resolution not understood; from the measured noise 4 - 5 eV is expected • Note: the best single pixels have ∆E = 3.9 eV and τeff = 85 μs

  9. In progress: Bi-absorber arrays (7 μm thick with Cu bottom/thermalisation layer) Mushroom shaped absorbers: thermal evaporation and lift-off Problems encountered for XEUS sized pixels (240 x 240 μm2) in 5 x 5 arrays: lift-off edges, particle-like anomalies, μ-cracks in Bi Single pixel Bi-absorber Hat: 160 x 160 μm2 Stem: 100 x 100 μm2 5 x 5 array Bi absorbers Hat: 240 x 240 μm2 Stem: 100 x 100 μm2

  10. Material parameters and Finite Element Modeling 5 x 5 pixel array 32 x 32 pixel array Advanced detector design through Finite Element Modelling (2D, 3D) • Measured and modelled thermal transport • el-ph coupling in TES and absorber • Kapitza coupling between TES - SiN • conductance silicon nitride membranes • conductance Si support beams • thermal coupling of Si chip to heat bath Basic layout of a sensor pixel

  11. SiN Si-beam with Cu SiN Uncoated Si Si-beam Beam with Cu side view Si(110) beam Finite Element Model of the XEUS array (1000 pixels of 10 pW each) • Thermal coupling of detector pixels to heat bath • Bare Si chip Tchip = 187 mK TSi beam = 200 mK • Cu coating back-side Si-chip Tchip = 41 mK TSi beam = 140 mK • Cu coating on Si beams and chip Tchip = 41 mK TSi beam = 47 mK Improvement of coupling chip to bath ! Improvement of coupling to heat bath and a small thermal gradient in Si beam: proper heat bath Future XEUS 32 x 32 pixel array

  12. Array development - summary • Array production based on bulk and surface micromachining • The pixel to pixel performance in BMM and SMM arrays is quite good (R(T), I(V)) • Thermal conductance of SiN on Si(110) is lower than expected -> τeff too high • To be measured: pixels with redesigned thermal support • Improvement of ΔE from 6 - 7 eV to values smaller than 5 eV needed • Working on reduced sensitivity of set-up for EMI • Working on more fundamental issues of the energy resolution • Development of large mushroom-shaped absorbers is critical and has high priority • The XEUS detector chip and pixels can be adequately cooled • Detailed Finite Element Model is available for thermal design, all relevant • low-temperature material parameters measured

  13. Frequency Domain Multiplexing - Motivation for multiplexed read-out • Thermal aspects related to the read-out and biasing of one pixel • Power dissipation: 10 pW/pixel • Power dissipation; 100pW/shunt resistor • Power dissipation: 1 nW/SQUID current amplifier • Heat input through wiring (5 at minimum, 4 twisted-wire pairs preferred) • Available cooling power XEUS ADR: 5.5 μWh @ 35 mK • 32 x 32 pixel array without multiplexing: only ~4 hours of operation!

  14. Frequency Domain Multiplexing • AC-biasing of TES microcalorimeter • TES acts as AM-modulator • LC noise blocking filters • One SQUID per column

  15. Need for loop gain • Large dynamic range required (current pulse vs current noise) • DR = 8.106 = Φ0/(2ΦSQUID) (1+LFLL); low-noise VTT SQUID: LFLL > 1.4 • Common impedance (SQUID input coil) leads to cross talk (from f1 to f2) • CT = 0.001 = [Lc/(1+LFLL )/L]2; LFLL > 10 • The SQUID is an non-linear component -> mixing products (from f1 to f2) • CT = 0.001 requires LFLL > 15

  16. Limitations of the achievable loop gain • Phase rotation due to cable delay imposes: tdelay.foperation < 0.11/LF; • For an optimized cryostat with 20 cm distance between SQUID and • warm electronics (t delay = 3 ns) • Phase rotation of the amplifier (simulation performed for a 200 MHz amplifier with one pole zero compensation) • Standard FLL • Combining 32 channels (with 100 kHz seperation) requires 3 MHz • LFLL~ 10 @ 3 MHz • It requires very close packing and the available low loop gain is low; it implies an appreciable fraction of mixing products • Baseband feedback • The carrier is deterministic and carries no information (use it in the feedback) • In principle, only the signal bandwidth (200 kHz) is relevant; it allows for high loop gains • LFLL ~ 200 @ 200 kHz

  17. Standard FLL Pro: Con: FLL proven concept- A-linearity in SQUID introduces crosstalk at 0.2% level - Common impedance leads to crosstalk at 0.4% level - Bandwidth limited to ~3 MHz, 32 close packed channels

  18. Baseband feedback • Pro: Con: • L > 200 results in: Complex demux/mux electronics • A-linearity in SQUID: crosstalk at < 0.01% level • Idle-current cancellation not required • Available bandwidth is up to ~10 MHz; allows for well-spaced carriers -> • cross-talk due to common impedance is no longer a problem

  19. Experimental status Frequency Domain Multiplexing (biasing of detectors) Biasing of microcalorimeter AC-bias measurements at 500 kHz to study potential switch-off behavior Microcalorimeter can be biased over the whole transition provided that the there is a small impedance in the biasing circuit <-> low dielectric loss in C Set-up for 250 kHz FLL operational and optimized Electronic resolution of FLL electronics, bias sources and mixers/de-mixers, and SQUID for detector biased in normal state is at present 2 eV Tests with a TES microcalorimeter with 5 eV resolution @ 6 keV (DC) AC-bias experiment at 50 kHz with 6.5 eV @ 6 keV Baseline noise 5 eV (~sensor dominated resolution) AC-bias experiment at 500 kHz with 8.8 eV @ 6 keV SQUID back-action noise (LSQUID) limits resolution of 8-9 eV AC-bias experiment at 250 kHz with 7 eV @ 6 keV Baseline noise 5 - 6 eV (sensor dominated resolution)

  20. Status Frequency Domain Multiplexing (noise blocking filters) LC filters required with Q ~2500 (depends on carrier frequency) Washer-type superconducting coils Minimize dimensions (reduce intercoil cross-talk) Superconducting capacitors High dielectric constant (small components) Low dielectric losses (tan δ < 0.001; introduces resistance) Si3N4 (VTT): Q = 2800 (compatibility of Si3N4 process) Al2O3 (SRON): Q = 300 (limited by critical current) L = 100 nH 500 m Test structures: 2.4 to 240 nF; size up to 4 x 4 mm2 Low leakage, R ~ 1 mΩ

  21. Outlook area: energy resolution • ΔE = 2.35 ξ [kBT2C]1/2 • Microcalorimeter physics Low heat capacity absorbers • What motivates the improvement of ΔE? • there is still very limited margin on ΔE with respect to the specification • for XEUS and other applications • the development of large area pixels with a good ΔE requires • that ξ and/or C are as low as possible (and under control)

  22. Outlook – summary • Detector physics – improvement of energy resolution (design: 1 – 1.5 eV) • Typical energy resolution (measured) 4 - 5 eV • Possible improvement pulse filtering factor 1.5 – 2 (Fixsen method) • Possible improvement by ITFN reduction factor 1.5 – 2 (TES with lower RN) • Device testing (single pixels and arrays) • Large area pixels • Low C materials: Bi, Sn • Compatibility with large arrays? • Design optimization, thermalization issues: ΔE and ΔE_xy (position dependence) • Production • Device testing (single pixels and arrays), E < 6 keV Absorber development

More Related