1 / 17

Radiation Protection Studies for the HIE ISOLDE Post-Accelerator

Radiation Protection Studies for the HIE ISOLDE Post-Accelerator. A. Dorsival, S. Giron, Joachim Vollaire on behalf of DGS-RP. Outline. Introduction Post-accelerated beams in ISOLDE today (before LS1) Increased radiological hazards with HIE-ISOLDE

Télécharger la présentation

Radiation Protection Studies for the HIE ISOLDE Post-Accelerator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Radiation Protection Studies for the HIE ISOLDE Post-Accelerator A. Dorsival, S. Giron, Joachim Vollaire on behalf of DGS-RP

  2. Outline • Introduction • Post-accelerated beams in ISOLDE today (before LS1) • Increased radiological hazards with HIE-ISOLDE • Shielding analysis for the new post-accelerator • Definition of the source term • FLUKA calculations and shielding integration • Maximum dose rate due to ion beam losses • RP monitoring • Conclusions and Perspectives HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  3. Post-accelerated beams in ISOLDE today • Current (warm) post-accelerator: • Already a source of X-ray with a max. energy of 400 keV (concrete + lead shielding) • Neutron energy ~ 3 MeV/amu below the Coulomb barrier (threshold value for nuclear reaction to occur) HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  4. Post-accelerated beams in ISOLDE today • RF interlock (captured key) prevent access during RF operation • RP measurements inside and outside the Linac Pos 1: 186 mGy/h Pos 2: 7 mGy/h Pos 3: 700 mGy/h Pos 4: 1.5 mGy/h Dose rate outside less than a few mSv/h HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  5. Increased radiological hazards with HIE-ISOLDE X-ray emitting devices { Existing { New (Radioactive) Ion beams 1 pnA = 6.25e9 ions/s Standard beam EDMS 1227549 (D. Voulot) Exceptional (emittance measurements) HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  6. Shielding for the new post-accelerator • Constraints & Challenges: • Accelerator inside the experimental hall • Consider space constraints and services necessary • define the source term !!!! • Strategy: • Review of existing facilities (Legnaro, Triumf…) • Measurements of X-ray emitted by prototype cavities • Conservative approach to extrapolate the maximum dose rate with the operation of several cavities in parallel • FLUKA calculations with a detailed layout of the shielding enclosure to identify possible weaknesses and access restrictions HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  7. Measurements of X-ray • Measurements performed on prototype cavities tested in SM18 (CERN) and IPN Orsay IPNO SM18 Dose Rate mGy/h Dose Rate mGy/h • Conclusions: • Hundreds of mGy/h during He processing • Few tens of mGy/h during normal operation 1 Gy ~ 1 Sv HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  8. Normalization for shielding calculations • Test bench in SM18 implemented as a FLUKA geometry • Starting randomly electron (900 keV = max. energy) in the ion beam plane • Normalization to the measurement results to obtain the electron emission rate Dose Rate mGy/h I0= 8 x 1013pps For 350 mGy/h at the monitor location 350 mGy/h HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  9. FLUKA calculation for the shielding • Detailed FLUKA geometry of the tunnel (penetrations, door…) • No access to the vault during RF operation (as today) • Design objective for the bulk shielding, remain below 1mSv/h due to X-ray from the cavities Penetration “chimney” (steel) Lead window Access door HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  10. Results of FLUKA calculations • Starting 600/900 keV (low/high beta) electrons using the normalization factor derived from the SM18 conditions with He processing in all cavities (pessimistic) • Normal RF operation/conditioning dose rate should be lower by more than a factor 10 Horizontal Cut at beam height – He Processing (all cavities) HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  11. Results of FLUKA calculations • Many penetrations on the roof (empty in the geometry) • Locally hundred of mSv/h on the roof during He processing • BASELINE : NO ACCESS TO THE ROOF DURING RF conditioning /He Processing and RF operation • Could be relaxed if measurements show acceptable levels HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  12. Post-Accelerator shielding status • Lateral concrete blocks have been delivered and installed • Still assessing the strategy for the up-beam shielding (1 cm of lead today) and the possibility to implement the final shielding for Phase 2 later • Repeat dose rate measurement on “production” cavities (possible safety margin) HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  13. Dose rate in case of (stable) ion beam losses Full beam loss of 1 ppA (profile) Example full beam loss of 1 ppA (dipole magnet) He 19.8 MeV/amu He 12 MeV/amu HALL ACCESSIBLE HALL ACCESSIBLE • Stable pilot (10 ppA /20 MeV/amu): • 130 mSv/h full beam loss (He) • Emittance meas. (1 pnA/11.3 MeV/amu): • 2 mSv/h full beam loss (He) Exclusion area for emittance measurements HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  14. Radiation monitoring • Replacement of ARCON monitor by RAMSES monitor launched during LS1 • Increase the monitoring of the low energy beam lines in case of RIB losses (Gamma Radiation Monitoring System GRAMS) • Monitoring specification take into account the post-accelerator operation and the high energy beam lines Conceptual specification • XRM (X-ray monitor) for pulsed x-ray • AMF (Area Mixed Field Radiation monitor) suitable for (n,g) • Local alarm units + 2 XRM above HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  15. Radiation monitoring integration 2 1 7 10 5 6 3 4 8 9 HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  16. Conclusions and perspectives • Comparison with existing facilities to determine that X-ray was the main hazard to consider for the tunnel • Effort to assess maximum dose rate for different cavity operation phases • Conservatism in the approach used : maximum energy for the e-, performances of prototype, all cavities conditioned in parallel…) • Ion beam intensity much lower than what is used in ISAC2 (TRIUMF) with the hall accessible to users • The RP monitoring has been specified accounting for X-ray monitoring and higher beam energies • Existing hazards and corresponding RP procedures will remain (contamination risks when opening the vacuum system and dose rate in case of strong gamma emitters beam loss or collection) • Future studies to assess the activation/RIB implantation for beam intercepting device (waste studies….) HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

  17. Acknowledgements • A. Bernardes, R. Catherall, M. Fraser, J. Hast , Y. Kadi, S. Maridor, J. Mildenberger, I. Mondino, B. Nicquevert, D. Parchet, E. Siesling, M. Therasse, A. Trudel, G. Vandoni, W. Venturini , D. Voulot….. HIE-ISOLDE Safety Review 05/11/2013

More Related