1 / 25

Rick Chan Frey, PhD University of California, Berkeley rick@mustardseedbooks

Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory. Rick Chan Frey, PhD University of California, Berkeley rick@mustardseedbooks.org. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory. Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org. The Amazonification of Knowledge

mayes
Télécharger la présentation

Rick Chan Frey, PhD University of California, Berkeley rick@mustardseedbooks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey, PhD University of California, Berkeley rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  2. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org The Amazonification of Knowledge How does Amazon know what books you’ll enjoy reading? Amazon has no theoretical framework to distinguish between hundreds of potential recommendations based on genre or style. Analyzing the data from millions of sales with similar reading patterns

  3. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org What percentage of the area of the square is covered by the circle?

  4. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org How to Know Something Without Knowing Anything About It Remember back to your 5th grade math, calculating the area of a square, circle and calculating a ratio. If you know the right formula, it’s easy and a mathematician could even explain why it works.

  5. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org How to Know Something Without Knowing Anything About It But pretend for a moment you didn’t know the formulas, didn’t know how to calculate ratios. Is there another way to solve the problem?

  6. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org Simulate the Answer with Scratch Draw a square 4” x 4” Draw a circle 2” diameter w/different color Have the computer draw random sprites Count what colors they land on

  7. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  8. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  9. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org What is IRT? • First and foremost, IRT (as with classical test theory) is about assessment, not instruction. • Adaptive testing - some questions are rated easier or harder than others, so the test has a better ability to differentiate student ability than a generic test. • Most developed statistical model for interactively measuring item difficulty and student ability.

  10. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Item - Response - Theory • Item – questions on a survey, math problems, multiple choice questions on SAT • Response – easily quantifiable, usually right/wrong, can have partial credit. • Theory – hypothesizing a construct (e.g. intelligence, love of art, etc.) that can be measured. Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  11. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory • Understand by example - Are you a tech junkie? • Do you own a computer? • Do you own a smart phone? • Do you own two or more tablets? • Have you ever tried Google glasses? Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  12. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Participants Bill Gates Average teenager grandma Have tried Google glasses Items Own a smart phone Own a computer Own 2+ tablets Tech junkie Luddite Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  13. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory • What could IRT offer reading researchers? • Quantitative measure of word difficulty • Improved accuracy in determining student reading ability from assessments • Reliability measures (item and test level) Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  14. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory How do researchers estimate word difficulty? • Ehri (2005) Earliest and simplest • Beck, McKeown & Kucan (2002) Word Tiers • Hiebert, Stewart & Uzicanin (2010) Word Features and Word Recognition • Fountas & Pinnell – Guided Reading • MetaMetrics – Lexile Scoring System Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  15. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory What are the basics we know? • Shorter words easier than longer words • Fewer syllables are easier • Higher frequency words are easier • Highly imageable words are easier • A quantitative measure of word difficulty could be highly useful Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  16. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Testing the Idea • One school, two 1st grade classes, (n=75) • Data from two years of DIBELS assessments Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) assessment • First 40 words of four different ORF assessments • Simple IRT analysis marking incorrectly read words as incorrect responses (no partial credit) Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  17. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings • Quantitative measures of word difficulty and student reading ability • Strong correlations (r between .54 and .72) for basics of word difficulty • Potential measure for text reliability • Identifies words that defy expectations • Provides potential model for analyzing the impact of context on word difficulty Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  18. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings – Word Difficulty • Text Word Ltrs Difficulty • ORF 1B-36 waiting 7 3.66 • ORF 1A-6 outside 7 3.41 • ORF 1B-3 mind 4 2.93 • ORF 2A-21 spot 4 1.81 • ORF 2A-29 got 3 0.28 • ORF 1B-32 fish 4 -1.65 • ORF 1B-1 I 1 -3.12 Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  19. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings – Strange Cases • “First we picked a spot far from the big waves” -- guess the word with the highest item difficulty score? • 3 letters, fairly easy phonetically, but easily confused with for • ¼ of the hardest 20 words had 3-4 letters, one syllable and were phonetically regular • Yellow, castle, anymore, all easier than traits would indicate Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  20. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings – Context Effect • A six letter, two syllable word with an unusual spelling pattern is missed by only 2 students, difficulty score -1.01 • “We built a giant sand castle at the beach.” • Built scored 2.85 difficult and giant was one of the top 5 hardest words at 3.34 • Fish tankand rocky road, no such luck Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  21. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings – Context Possibilities • Compare instances of reading same words in different contexts (starting a sentence, in subordinate clause, etc.) • Compare instances of words with suffixes (lick, licks, licked, licking) • Compare the effects of background knowledge on word difficulty scores Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  22. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Findings – Text Reliability • Use of Chronbach’s alpha to measure reliability of a given text for assessing student reading ability • Each of the four passages scored .97 or higher • Few words across the four passages had poor fit Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  23. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Conclusions • IRT provides researchers with a quantitative method for assessing word difficulty that can be used in a wide variety of research designs. • IRT offers useful information for text designers attempting to design and redesign increasingly complicated texts that comply with common core standards. • IRT offers a window into the brave new world of big data, suggesting new ideas about literacy development we don't necessarily understand but would be wise to consider. Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  24. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory Leveled Texts 3.0 -- www.mustardseedbooks.org Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

  25. Perspectives on Word Difficulty Using Item Response Theory For a copy of the presentation or questions contact: Rick Chan Frey, PhD rick@mustardseedbooks.org www.mustardseedbooks.org Rick Chan Frey - LRA 2013 rick@mustardseedbooks.org

More Related