1 / 19

A Country of Contrasts

HOW POACHING is AFFECTING COMMUNITIES Greg Stuart-Hill, WWF in Namibia on behalf of The Namibian Team. A Country of Contrasts. With Conservation Successes. Where we are now ?. 82 Conservancies 16 million ha (20%) of country 200 ,000 poor rural people

mbowman
Télécharger la présentation

A Country of Contrasts

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HOW POACHING is AFFECTING COMMUNITIESGreg Stuart-Hill, WWF in Namibiaon behalf ofThe Namibian Team

  2. A Country of Contrasts With Conservation Successes

  3. Where we are now? • 82 Conservancies • 16 million ha (20%) of country • 200,000 poor rural people • From 1991, US$0.4 billion to Namibia’s national economy • Escalating year on year • In 2013: • Tourism & hunting generated N$72,2 mil for communities. • Supported 6,472 jobs – will rise dramatically next 5 years • Generated 500,000 kg of meat for local communities - 2 million high protein meals.

  4. Income/Benefit Flows (2011-13) UNDERSTANDING BENEFITS Conservancy Committee BENEFITS/INCENTIVES To the rest of the community “the poorest of the poor” JV & Hunter Employees Traditional Authority Livestock Owners Conservancy Employees

  5. Income/Benefit Flows (2011-13) Tourism Fees Employment Conservancy Committee Conservancy Operating Costs Running costs Salaries etc Cash BENEFITS/INCENTIVES To the rest of the community “the poorest of the poor” JV & Hunter Employees Traditional Authority Livestock Owners Conservancy Employees

  6. Income/Benefit Flows (2011-13) Hunting Tourism Fees Fees Employment Conservancy Committee Conservancy Operating Costs Meat Running costs Running costs HWC compensation Chief/TA fees Salaries etc Cash Cash Employment BENEFITS/INCENTIVES To the rest of the community “the poorest of the poor” JV & Hunter Employees Traditional Authority Livestock Owners Conservancy Employees

  7. Damage to Community Tourism? (the Job factory) Rhino tourism at one community owned lodge, In 2013: generated N$3 million in direct additional earnings TOTAL POTENTIAL LOSS N$3million/yr , (20% of lodge’s occupancy) FROM JUST ONE LODGE This lodge employs 46 people! Rhino & elephant in Parks such as Etosha are critical - just to get tourists into Namibia as community lodges are secondary destinations.

  8. Damage to Communities Trophy Hunting? (the Money & Meat Factory) • Trophy hunting might end: • Cut quotas, or • Trophy bans • Annual losses of approximately US$1million to Communities (excluding income to outfitters and staff) • Loss of jobs - 530 conservancy game guards, plus numerous skinners, trackers, camp staff, etc. (Potential Poachers!) • Loss of 500,000 kg meat - 2 million high protein meals • Impacts not spread evenly across all conservancies – Spatial Impact

  9. Current Financial viability of Conservancies (Income – Costs)

  10. Current Financial viability of Conservancies (Income – Costs) • If Trophy Hunting Stops • Trophy Bans • Reduced quotas

  11. The Poaching Threat (in the eyes of the community) • In Caprivi, 95 elephant poached in 2014 • Lost elephant= lost income + lost meat + ……… •  Lost meat benefits to members (1,2 million meals) •  At risk salaries for Game Guards & Staff (>350) •  At risk budget for running costs (US$1 million) •  HWC increases – predators stimulated by carcasses •  Future impact on their tourism industry • To communities- its about the threat to livelihoods, economic development and job opportunities • Use this ‘ticket’ to engage communities

  12. -veEnabling Environment for Law Enforcement +ve Enabling Environment for Law Enforcement Help Poachers Lobbies for political action Endorses political inaction Endless supply of poachers Poaching becomes anti-social Help Law enforcement agencies ON-SIDE COMMUNITY ANTAGONISTIC COMMUNITY • See no future with wildlife • No Ownership • No Benefits • No support from conservationists • No empathy • No markets for products • Human Wildlife Conflict • Heavy-handed law enforcement • No law enforcement support • etc • See a future with wildlife • Proprietorship • 100% Benefits • Exclude external users • Capacity building support • Empathetic support • Value addition activities (PES?) • Capex support • Law enforcement support • etc

  13. BALANCE MOTIVATING LAND OWNERSWhilst FIGHTING POACHERS Wildlife Crime Programmes Increase risks Increase effort Reduce rewards STEWARDS POACHERS Increase Motivation & Capacity Law Enforcement Support Generate Benefits Build Ownership Investment & Capacity Support CBNRM Programmes

  14. Thank You

  15. Strategies to Counter Wildlife Crime Increase Security & Prosecutions (Anti-Poaching) Stop Illegal Trade The Task of the International Community The Task of Law Enforcement Agencies Eyes and Ears Grow the Populations The Task of Land Stewards/Communities Habitat Expansion by Land Stewards/Communities

  16. Destroys Stakeholder Trust & Collaboration In Namibia stakeholders work well together: MET – Communities – NGO’s & ? - - - Police - - - Judiciary Poaching raises emotions and breaks down trust Results in: • heavy handed law enforcement, • risks erosion of rights and benefits of stewards.

  17. Organized Civil Society, Governance & Partnerships • 82 Elected CBO’s • 1 of every 8 Namibians • 530+ trained Game Guards • 1000’s of km of patrols • Monitoring Systems • Committed to Wildlife as a land-use • Partnerships: • NACSO - 13 NGOs & UNAM • Working Groups & MET • Conservancy Associations

  18. Income/Benefit Flows (2011-13) Hunting Tourism Fees Fees Employment CONSERVATION INVESTMENTS Conservancy Committee Conservancy Operating Costs Meat Running costs HWC compensation Chief/TA fees Cash benefits Salaries etc Employment BENEFITS/INCENTIVES To the rest of the community “the poorest of the poor” JV & Hunter Employees Traditional Authority Livestock Owners Conservancy Employees

  19. Anything that erodes Ownershipundermines community support for wildlife Anti-poaching laws, rules and actions can work against the spirit of Conservancy Legislation By undermining the feeling of ownership through: • Heavy handed and insensitive militaristic policing • Outsiders taking over, making rules, giving instructions • Excluding conservancies from law-enforcement activities • Blaming the entire community for the actions of a few • Trade bans, onerous compliance, etc

More Related