1 / 18

Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

a. Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. b. Department of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran. c. Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Gahram, Iran. Introduction.

mccalla
Télécharger la présentation

Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. a Department of Statistics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran b Department of Mathematics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran c Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University, Gahram, Iran

  2. Introduction The usual kurtosis measure is where :

  3. Height Whatis kurtosis ? does not sort the distributions based on the height

  4. Height Whatis kurtosis ? We compute for some distributions, Uniform, Normal, Logistic, Laplace, and Cauchy for the above distributions the kurtosis Measures, ,are 1.8, 3, 4.2, 6, and respectively.

  5. Height Whatis kurtosis ? As the height of distributions increases, the order of distributions will be Logistic, Cauchy, Normal, Laplace, and Uniform respectively.

  6. Disadvantages of 1- It’s infinite for heavy tail distributions. 2- It doesn’t work well for some distributions such as Ali’s scale contaminated normal distributions. where is the standard normal distribution function.

  7. when But this sequence converges in distribution to the standard normal distribution as . 3- It can be misleading as a departure from normality. is not a sufficient condition for normality.

  8. A Modified Measure of Kurtosis Where p and q are quantile of order p and q, respectively

  9. is as the same as We show that the treatment of Properties of If f(x) > 0 for all x. P.3. = Proof: since where A(k) = And B(k) = Lim A(k) = lim B(k) = 0 as

  10. Oja (1981) says a location and scale invariant functionl T can be named a kurtosis measure if whenever G has at least as much Kurtosis as F according to the definition of relative kurtosis. Propertiesof kurtosis measure T is a kurtosis measure if : 1- It must be location and scale invariant i.e. T(ax+b) = T(x) for a > 0 2- It must preserve one of the orderings. Ordering << were defined in such a way that F<< G means, in some location and scale free, that G has at least as much mass in the center and tails as F i.e. if F<sG then T(F) <= T(G)

  11. Van Zwet (1964) introduced for the class of symmetric distributions an ordering <s defined by F <s G iff is convex for x > mf. Where mf is the point of symmetric of F. The distributions are ordered by the s ordering. SIF < 0 iff .742 < x < 2.334 SIF > 0 iff x < .742 or x > 2.334

  12. tail center flank

  13. We compute SIF for Logistic and Laplace to compare the concentration probability mass in their center, flank and tails. 6 = β2(Laplace) > β2(Logistic) = 4.2 By comparing SIF of two distributions the centers of two distributions are approximately equal. But contamination at the tails of Laplace is more than Logistic. Contamination at the center has far less influence than that in the extreme values.

  14. Let F and G be distribution functions that are symmetric and define We consider G =

  15. The values of are equal to 6 for all values of Shape Parameter of sharply peakedness

  16. For < .798 the distribution is shorter than standardized normal distribution. By increasing the distributions will be more sharper. Discussion: We discuss about the properties of the usual kurtosis, then we introduce a modified measure of kurtosis and we consider the properties of this kurtosis measure. We show that this kurtosis measure is robust and its treatment is as the same as the usual kurtosis measure. Furthermore for departure from normality the shape of the parameter must be considered, so by noting the sharply peaked parameter the inference of distribution of population will be more correctly.

  17. References:

More Related