1 / 19

Status of ATLAS Resources

CERN-RRB-2007- 074. Status of ATLAS Resources. Presentation to RRB 22.10.2007 Markus Nordberg ATLAS Resources Coordination. Introduction to Funding Agency Tables. To remind, the primary purpose of the Funding Agency (FA) tables is to show received or planned income

mckile
Télécharger la présentation

Status of ATLAS Resources

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CERN-RRB-2007- 074 Status of ATLAS Resources Presentation to RRB 22.10.2007 Markus Nordberg ATLAS Resources Coordination

  2. Introduction to Funding Agency Tables • To remind, the primary purpose of the Funding Agency (FA) tables is to show received or planned income • The M&O, C&I and CC tables also show the total payments made by the Project • Cost to Completion (CtC)= Commissioning & Integration (C&I) + Construction Completion (CC) • Category A = Common items • Category B = System-specific items • To read the tables • Baseline and CC-A • ‘Contributions by Funding Agencies’ = income received from FAs • ‘Commitments’ by FAs = commitments requested from the FAs, also beyond the budget year • M&O, CtC (=C&I+CC) • ‘Contributions by Funding Agencies’ = income received from FAs • ‘Other income’ = contribution advancements for the future; deferral funds; contributions, transfers from baseline • ‘Total (actual) payments’ = payments made by the Project • ‘Balance’ = total contributions + other income – total payments • The Table numbering refers to those in Documents 071 and 073, respectively

  3. #071: Baseline Commitments Evolution (%) Note: TDAQ re-baselined in accordance with CERN-RRB-2004-017 (initial detector)

  4. Baseline Payments Evolution (MCHF), EoY 2007

  5. 2007 Baseline Report (Tables 1 - 3), MCHF Note: Assumes all due CF contributions received by EoY 2007. For global budget balance, see Table 7 Common Projects include CC-A

  6. 2007 C&I Income & Payments (Table 4), kCHF Note: Balance achieved by using cash deferrals within global cash-flow management shown in Table 7.

  7. 2007 CC-B Income & Payments (Table 5), kCHF Note: Balance achieved by using cash deferrals within global cash-flow management shown in Table 7.

  8. 2008 Baseline (Tables 8 - 10), MCHF Note: This assumes all due contributions from 2007 will be paid. In reality, a funding gap of up to 7 MCHF is projected at this point in time. The global cash-flow situation is summarized in Table 7.

  9. Status of Remaining Contributions (Annex 2, August 31, 2007), kCHF Note: CtC refers to 2002 financial plan and CtC(2) to correction made in 2006

  10. Projected Budget Balance (Table 7), MCHF

  11. Why These Budget Balance Problems? • Baseline & Common Fund • Some requested baseline & CF contributions will not arrive in 2007 • Russia + JINR 4.0 MCHF • Canada 1.5 MCHF • US 1.5 MCHF (but in progress of being paid) • Due MS fees 0.2 MCHF • Note: Cost of ID repairs and delays not included • Technical problems encountered in the Inner Detector (heaters, electronics) not expected to result in (net) overcosts • April RRB plan assumed beam-pipe closure by end of August, 2007.The cost of keeping the commissioning crews until start of operation is ca. 250 kCHF/month. Too early to estimate a global figure for ATLAS, will return to this in April 2008 • Advanced contributions from several FAs is gratefully acknowledged!

  12. #073: Table 1 2008 M&O-A Budget Estimates in kCHF • Category A (14.1 MCHF) • Cost drivers • Technical services (4.0 MCHF) • Magnet operation (2.9 MCHF) • Core computing I&S (1.8 MCHF) • On-line comp. (2.3 MCHF) • Energy (2.2 MCHF)

  13. #073: Table 1 • 2008 M&O-B Budget Estimates in kCHF • Category B (6.9 MCHF) • Cost drivers • Technical services, manpower (3.0 MCHF) • Electronics replacements, rental (1.7 MCHF) • Operation of SR1 (0.7 MCHF) • 98 FTE core computing effort as in-kind • Note: gases & coolants moved into Category A

  14. Evolution of M&O 2002 – 2010, MCHF

  15. #073: M&O in-kind Contributions 2008 • The following two new in-kind contributions are for approval: • Surveyors (165kCHF, JINR) • Core computing (I&S); 870 kCHF, multiple Funding Agencies (see next slide)

  16. Core Computing (I&S) in-kind 2008 • The following in-kind contributions are planned for 2007 • Czech Rep: 0.4 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 35 kCHF • IN2P3: 1.0 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 88 kCHF • BMBF: 0.9 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 79 kCHF • MPI: 0.3 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 22 kCHF • Israel: 0.2 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 18 kCHF • INFN: 1.8 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 158 kCHF • Poland: 0.1 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 9 kCHF • Russia: 0.3 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 22 kCHF • JINR: 0.4 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 35 kCHF • Taipei: 0.1 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 9 kCHF • UK: 1.5 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 132 kCHF • US: 3.0 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 264 kCHF TOTAL: 9.9 FTE x 88 kCHF/FTE = 870 kCHF

  17. Status of M&O Signatures (Table 3) Sept 25, 2007 • 38 of 40 Funding Agencies have signed • Waiting for: Argentina, Brazil

  18. Status of Due M&O Contributions (<2007) • The following contributions (Categories A + B) are due EoY 2006 (or earlier) by August 31, 2007: • Italy 71 kCHF • Armenia 27 kCHF • Belarus 122kCHF • Georgia 28 kCHF • Morocco 33 kCHF • Portugal 22 kCHF • Russia 1178 kCHF • JINR 161 kCHF • TOTAL: 1642 kCHF • Global plans are in place to restore the balance (in some cases, expected to take some time)

  19. RRB Invited to • Take note of the 2007 budget status (baseline & CtC) • Approve the 2008 construction and M&O budgets

More Related