1 / 39

STAR 2008

STAR 2008. AUSD Student Achievement Analysis. Over-arching Goal:.

melora
Télécharger la présentation

STAR 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. STAR 2008 AUSD Student Achievement Analysis

  2. Over-arching Goal: Increase achievement for all students while closing the achievement gap in English/language arts and mathematics between our lowest performing subgroups— African Americans, Latinos, English Learners, and Special Education students— and our highest performing subgroups— Whites and Asians.

  3. This Report Examines: • Academic Performance Index (API) • Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) • CST highlights and issues • Areas of focus based on data

  4. Academic Performance Index API— • California State measure • Mostly based on CST scores • Single composite score of performance • Rewards moving students up • Moving target– Base API to Growth API

  5. District API Possibly inflated by 1-2 pointsWill be revised in November

  6. Elementary School API Nine Schools above 800

  7. Elementary School API Ruby Bridges now over 800

  8. Elementary School API Double digit growth at four sites

  9. Middle School API

  10. Middle School API Chipman- two years of double digit growth Lincoln- double digit growth Wood- Prior year growth

  11. High School APITo be reported in November

  12. AYP- Annual Yearly Progress • Sets required targets • Percent proficient – ELA and math • Significant subgroups must meet targets • High school proficiency based mainly on CAHSEE • Includes participation rate and graduation rate.

  13. AYP- ELA 2008 Progress toward Annual Measurable Objectives 2009 target= 45%

  14. Gradual Consistent Increases-- Strong Performance of Whites, Asians and Districtwide White 78% Asian 74% District 65%

  15. English Learners Show Strong Increases White Asian District English Learners +15%

  16. …But the Achievement Gap in ELA is Growing White 78% Asian 74% Afr.American35% Amer. Indian 33% Sp.Ed. 29%

  17. AYP- Math 2008 Progress toward Annual Measurable Objectives

  18. Overall Math Proficiency High District 63%

  19. Math— Growth from 2003-2006 District 63%

  20. Math Data Flat 2006-08 Asian White District English Learners Hispanic African American Sp. Ed.

  21. Some Groups Show Slight Losses Asian Filipino Sp. Ed.

  22. AUSD Missed Annual Measureable Objective for Some Subgroups AMO African American Sp. Ed. 2009 target= 45.5%

  23. Implications Regarding Program Improvement (PI) • AUSD will be on the District PI Watch list. • Chipman will continue in Program Improvement Year 3. • Wood School will be on the PI Watch list based on math for English Learners and low income students.

  24. A Closer Look: CST Scores • End-of-Year test for standards taught • Look at data by grade • Helps pinpoint where to put focus

  25. English Language Arts

  26. ELA Growth in Grades 4-9 Over 60% proficient and improving

  27. English Language Arts Growth in Grades 4-9 Gradual but steady growth

  28. Proficiency Decline Steeper in Math

  29. Math— Over 70% Proficient in Grades 2-5 Increases in Grades 3-6

  30. Math Decline Sharp in Grades 6-11 Proficiency Down in Grades 7-10

  31. Looking Deeper • Math proficiency in grades 6-11 • Math achievement by subgroup

  32. Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-11

  33. Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-11 African American Students

  34. Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-11 Hispanic- Latino Students

  35. Math Achievement by Subgroup, Grades 6-11 Asian Students- The highest performing group

  36. What the Data Doesn’t Show • More students are taking higher level math classes. • Last year, 40% of all 7th grade students took Algebra. In 06-07, 31% took Algebra. • African American and Latino students are under-represented in higher level math classes. • Math proficiency in grade-level and advanced classes is dropping.

  37. Moving beyond the data • Hold a Math Summit in the fall that includes math teachers, administrators, and support providers. • Incorporate SIM and other instructional strategies into math professional development. • Continue professional development that supports math content knowledge. • Last spring, tightened requirements for 7th grade Algebra.

  38. In addition • Adopt math intervention materials. • Adopt new math textbooks that allow for integrating appropriate instructional strategies. • Further tighten placement of students into 7th grade algebra.

  39. In Review— • Overall, achievement in ELA is up. • Achievement in math is up in some grades, and high overall in elementary grades. • The achievement gap for African American and Latino students is extreme in math in grades 7-11. • We have increased the number of students taking challenging math classes, but with some loss of proficiency. • We have a plan to address the problems that surfaced in the data.

More Related